Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

1999-04-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to Allan> a certain extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce Allan> the notion of ownership to the various modules. So we could Allan> have a gui namespace and an

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

1999-04-12 Thread Asger Alstrup Nielsen
> Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to a certain > extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce the notion of > ownership to the various modules. So we could have a gui namespace and an > Inset namespace among others. If we then use namespaces in our code we > c

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

1999-04-11 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> # We still need portability to other platforms of course but we > Allan> can draw a line and say "it must support namespaces" or > Allan> whatever else we desire. We can probably

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

1999-04-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> # We still need portability to other platforms of course but we Allan> can draw a line and say "it must support namespaces" or Allan> whatever else we desire. We can probably get away without Allan> partial specialization of templates

Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

1999-03-29 Thread Allan Rae
On 29 Mar 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > We need to introduce namespaces rather soon. > Lgb Perhaps we should make a decision as to what compiler capabilities we require. By the time LyX-1.1 is finished and stable enough to release there will probably be another gcc released and egcs w