Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
Insert-Tabular with the Return key?
The picture -' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does not
work for me neither in 1.4.0cvs nor 1.3.5cvs.
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
Insert-Tabular with the Return key?
Yes.
The picture -' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does not
work for me neither in 1.4.0cvs
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
Insert-Tabular with the Return key?
Yes.
The picture -' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
thinking of this possibility at
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
Insert-Tabular with the Return key?
Yes.
The picture -' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does
not work for me neither in
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Works for me for the tabular create dialog in both lyx 13x and
14x.
Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
Sounds to me like Andre is talking about the Tabular edit dialog not
Create, which disallows
John Levon wrote:
Works for me for the tabular create dialog in both lyx 13x and
14x.
Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
Sounds to me like Andre is talking about the Tabular edit dialog not
Create, which disallows Return-OK for good reason
Granted. But that
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Granted. But that doesn't have an Ok button, just a Close.
True.
Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your Challenging
position in systems software development?
Sure did. I'm busy hacking Solaris for Sun.
Can we
John Levon wrote:
Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your Challenging
position in systems software development?
Sure did. I'm busy hacking Solaris for Sun.
Interesting. Based here or in the US?
Can we tempt you back to writing code for LyX?
I'm waiting for lyx to get close
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Interesting. Based here or in the US?
Both really :) I'm still in Manchester but practically everybody I work
with lives in California.
Fair enough. It's been a frustrating time, but things *are* getting
better.
That's good to
John Levon wrote:
Fair enough. It's been a frustrating time, but things *are* getting
better.
That's good to hear. I look forward to trying to work out how lyx
works all over again :)
Change tracking is unfortunately badly broken for quite some time,
it would be a shame if this wasn't
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your Challenging
position in systems software development? Can we tempt you back to
writing code for LyX?
Or just check that everything is in order with change tracking, for
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:39:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Works for me for the tabular create dialog in both lyx 13x and
14x.
Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
Sounds to me like Andre is
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:07:24PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
Change tracking is unfortunately badly broken for quite some time, it
would be a shame if this wasn't brought back into a working state by
release time
That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
around in a
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
around in a corner somewhere it 'only' takes someone who knows how it
used to work to cobble it together...
Last I looked, fixing it would require some non-trivial
John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
around in a corner somewhere it 'only' takes someone who knows how it
used to work to cobble it together...
Last I looked, fixing it would
Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
Insert->Tabular with the key?
The picture <-' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does not
work for me neither in 1.4.0cvs nor 1.3.5cvs.
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
> Insert->Tabular with the key?
Yes.
> The picture <-' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
> thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does not
> work for me neither in 1.4.0cvs
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
> > Insert->Tabular with the key?
>
> Yes.
>
> > The picture <-' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
> > thinking of this
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> > Is there a possibility to invoke the OK button in dialogs like
>> > Insert->Tabular with the key?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > The picture <-' on the button seems to indicate that somebody was
>> > thinking of this possibility at some point of time, but it does
>> > not work for
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Works for me for the "tabular create" dialog in both lyx 13x and
> >> 14x.
> >
> > Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
Sounds to me like Andre is talking about the Tabular edit dialog not
Create, which
John Levon wrote:
>> >> Works for me for the "tabular create" dialog in both lyx 13x and
>> >> 14x.
>> > Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
> Sounds to me like Andre is talking about the Tabular edit dialog not
> Create, which disallows Return->OK for good reason
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Granted. But that doesn't have an "Ok" button, just a "Close".
True.
> Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your "Challenging
> position in systems software development"?
Sure did. I'm busy hacking Solaris for Sun.
John Levon wrote:
>> Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your "Challenging
>> position in systems software development"?
>
> Sure did. I'm busy hacking Solaris for Sun.
Interesting. Based here or in the US?
>> Can we tempt you back to writing code for LyX?
>
> I'm waiting for lyx
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Interesting. Based here or in the US?
Both really :) I'm still in Manchester but practically everybody I work
with lives in California.
> Fair enough. It's been a frustrating time, but things *are* getting
> better.
That's good
John Levon wrote:
>> Fair enough. It's been a frustrating time, but things *are* getting
>> better.
>
> That's good to hear. I look forward to trying to work out how lyx
> works all over again :)
>
> Change tracking is unfortunately badly broken for quite some time,
> it would be a shame if this
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:00:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, How is life with you? Did you find your "Challenging
> position in systems software development"? Can we tempt you back to
> writing code for LyX?
Or just check that everything is in order with change tracking, for
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:39:01PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > >> Works for me for the "tabular create" dialog in both lyx 13x and
> > >> 14x.
> > >
> > > Well, not here. This is fvwm2 but I doubt this is the reason.
>
> Sounds
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:07:24PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Change tracking is unfortunately badly broken for quite some time, it
> would be a shame if this wasn't brought back into a working state by
> release time
That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
around in a
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
> around in a corner somewhere it 'only' takes someone who knows how it
> used to work to cobble it together...
Last I looked, fixing it would require some
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> That'd be indeed a shame. But as all the change tracking code sits
>> around in a corner somewhere it 'only' takes someone who knows how it
>> used to work to cobble it together...
>
> Last I looked, fixing
30 matches
Mail list logo
