On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:21:49PM -0400, John Weiss wrote:
I say define anything that depends on environment ... like the
textclasses ... as simple string attributes. We can make exceptions
for *certain* textclasses ... like Standard ... that are pretty much
universal. Just my $0.02
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:21:49PM -0400, John Weiss wrote:
>
> I say define anything that depends on environment ... like the
> textclasses ... as simple string attributes. We can make exceptions
> for *certain* textclasses ... like "Standard" ... that are pretty much
> universal. Just my
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
To make the lists be lists in the xml doc will be quite hard (or so I
belive), it would be nice, but with no help from the internal
structure it will IMHO be very errorprone, so I have postphoned that
transformation for
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:22:41AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
!-- layout should of course have been a IDREF to the layouts actually --
!-- found in the different textclasses. Is that possible to --
!--
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> To make the lists be lists in the xml doc will be quite hard (or so I
> belive), it would be nice, but with no help from the internal
> structure it will IMHO be very errorprone, so I have postphoned that
> transformation
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:22:41AM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> I doubt, we don't want to bind the lyx dtd with the different textclasses,
> that is the advantage of extensibility.
I say
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
Wrt the 'deeper' stuff and paragraph lists in general.
I'd really like to see something like
para
list
item
para ... /para
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
| Wrt the 'deeper' stuff and paragraph lists in general.
| I'd really like to see something
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
> used CDATA earlier.
Wrt the 'deeper' stuff and paragraph lists in general.
I'd really like to see something like
...
...
...
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
>> used CDATA earlier.
>
| Wrt the 'deeper' stuff and paragraph lists in general.
| I'd really like to see
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Updated DTD and patch.
The environments deeper,paragraphparamters,paragraphcontent has been
removed.
| That can only be a good sign. :-)
| I have annotated your
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Updated DTD and patch.
>>
>> The environments deeper,paragraphparamters,paragraphcontent has been
>> removed.
>
| That can only be a good sign. :-)
>
| I have
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
| use Relax NG instead?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
| | Would I be terribly foolish to suggest
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[checked a bit]
Sure, but I'll stick with what I have for now. Easy enough to change
later.
Also I am not sure I like to have the dtd be part of the document
proper.
What? Are you saying that there isn't no catalogs
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
| use Relax NG instead?
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
| wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places
that used CDATA earlier.
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future
| and use Relax NG instead?
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[checked a bit]
Sure, but I'll stick with what I have for now. Easy enough to change
later.
Also I am not sure I like to have the dtd be part of the document
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
| wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places
that used CDATA earlier.
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | These are the files I play with currently.
| | The saven UserGuide.lyx.xml validates with the lyxformat.dtd and is
| | the result of the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:33:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Well, how do docbook reference the relax dtd from the xml document?
Honestly I didn't look into it yet. Too much work, too few time. :-)
I tried to use the lyxformat.rlx to do the validation, unsuccessful so
far.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Updated DTD and patch.
The environments deeper,paragraphparamters,paragraphcontent has been
removed.
That can only be a good sign. :-)
I have annotated your proposal with some small notes bellow.
?xml version=1.0
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
>> used CDATA earlier.
>
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
| use Relax NG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
>>> used CDATA earlier.
>>
| | Would I be terribly
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> [checked a bit]
>
> Sure, but I'll stick with what I have for now. Easy enough to change
> later.
>
> Also I am not sure I like to have the dtd be part of the document
> proper.
What? Are you saying that there isn't no
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
>> used CDATA earlier.
>
| Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
| use Relax NG
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
> | wrote:
>>
>>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places
>>> that used CDATA earlier.
>>
> | Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future
> | and use Relax NG
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> [checked a bit]
>>
>> Sure, but I'll stick with what I have for now. Easy enough to change
>> later.
>>
>> Also I am not sure I like to have the dtd be part of
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes
>> | wrote:
>>>
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places
that used CDATA earlier.
>>>
>> | Would I be terribly foolish to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>
| | These are the files I play with currently.
>>
| | The saven UserGuide.lyx.xml validates with the lyxformat.dtd and is
| | the result of
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:33:49AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Well, how do docbook reference the relax dtd from the xml document?
Honestly I didn't look into it yet. Too much work, too few time. :-)
> I tried to use the lyxformat.rlx to do the validation, unsuccessful so
> far.
>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Updated DTD and patch.
>
> The environments deeper,paragraphparamters,paragraphcontent has been
> removed.
That can only be a good sign. :-)
I have annotated your proposal with some small notes bellow.
>
...
Any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| These are the files I play with currently.
| The saven UserGuide.lyx.xml validates with the lyxformat.dtd and is
| the result of the xmlformat-3.diff.
This is an update of the DTD. It uses
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
I had thought about that before and I agree with you about the paragraph
parameters. For several reasons, the main being that there
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
| I had thought about that before and I agree with you about the paragraph
|
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
used CDATA earlier.
Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
use Relax NG instead?
john
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
| These are the files I play with currently.
>
| The saven UserGuide.lyx.xml validates with the lyxformat.dtd and is
| the result of the xmlformat-3.diff.
This is an update of the DTD. It uses
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
> used CDATA earlier.
I had thought about that before and I agree with you about the paragraph
parameters. For several reasons, the main being that
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
>> used CDATA earlier.
>
| I had thought about that before and I agree with you about the
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> This is an update of the DTD. It uses NMTOKEN in several places that
> used CDATA earlier.
Would I be terribly foolish to suggest that we accept the future and
use Relax NG instead?
john
40 matches
Mail list logo
