On 28-Dec-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> One more thing is that the attributes are currently stored using numbers
> e.g. alignment="8" which is not very good.
You're right this should be changed to something more verbose!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
I guess it's time I reply to this one (sorry for the delay but I'm really
busy at the moment).
On 23-Dec-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> In 1.1.6, a tabular is stored as follows
>
>
> ...
> 1. The table/row/column/cell attributes should be written only if they differ
> from the default value (so inst
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 10:36:09PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> In 1.1.6, a tabular is stored as follows
>
> [ snip ]
>
> This is makes the lyx file very large: we use about 250 bytes per cell (not
> including the text of the cells), comparing to about 35 bytes per cell with
> old tabular code. Th
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> It will breaks backward compatibility (i.e., new format files
> Dekel> cannot be read by the current code).
>
> Are you sure? Do you mean that is a tag is mi
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> It will breaks backward compatibility (i.e., new format files
Dekel> cannot be read by the current code).
Are you sure? Do you mean that is a tag is missing, it will not have a
proper default value?
>> Obviously, as is is used, Col
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:38:26PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I agree that table format is much too verbose.
>
> Dekel> 1. The table/row/column/cell attributes should be written only
> Dekel> if they differ from the default value (so instead of Dekel> multicolumn="0" alignment="8" ...>
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dekel> In 1.1.6, a tabular is stored as follows
[...]
Dekel> This is makes the lyx file very large: we use about 250 bytes
Dekel> per cell (not including the text of the c
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is makes the lyx file very large: we use about 250 bytes per cell (not
| including the text of the cells), comparing to about 35 bytes per cell with
| old tabular code.
I don't see a _huge_ problem with this.
| This can be improved in the following
