Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 31.05.2013 09:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: This is now in for master and branch. Thanks. There's still a problem, perhaps only a lyx2lyx issue: there can be a document that compiles in 2.1git that when exported to 2.0.x does not compile in LyX 2.0git. Should I write a ticket for this or for

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.05.2013 18:41, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > This is now in for master and branch. Thanks. There's still a problem, perhaps only a lyx2lyx issue: there can be a document that compiles in 2.1git that when exported to 2.0.x does not compile in LyX

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 30.05.2013 18:41, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Can you try to fix the French User Guide? Its translation is underway. Please be patient with this. This is now in for master and branch. regards Uwe

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 28.05.2013 07:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Can you try to fix the French User Guide? Its translation is underway. Please be patient with this. regards Uwe

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Jürgen or Uwe, Can you try to fix the French User Guide? I can fix it so that it compiles on 2.1git or so that it compiles on 2.0git but I cannot get it so that it compiles on both, which I assume is what we want. Scott

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-27 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Scott, can you check out the attached patch? It does not fix existing > > cases > > (such as the issue in the French UG you mentioned), but it seems to behave > > correctly when cr

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Scott, can you check out the attached patch? It does not fix existing cases > (such as the issue in the French UG you mentioned), but it seems to behave > correctly when creating new ones (i.e. copying the res

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > I guess the question comes down to: > > What is the expected behavior when the whole paragraph is selected and > > the language is set to English? Should the argument (within the > > paragraph) be set to French as is currently the case starting with > > commit 53002538

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I did not double check, but it seems believable that the commit that > git bisect led me to is indeed the source of the problem here. After some investigation, I believe it is not the source but just uncovers this problem. > I guess the question comes down to: > What is

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > But unless we have more backgorund info, we cannot do anything anyway. I did not double check, but it seems believable that the commit that git bisect led me to is indeed the source of the problem here. The commit has to do with passin

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Kornel Benko wrote: > What I was after, is that this is a regression. The original file is created > with 2.0.x, compiles there fine. But after lyx2lyx it does not compile by > lyx2.1. I think, it is lyx2lyx problem. I'm not sure this is the case. I cannot imagine lyx2lyx causing anything here. B

Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 um 12:55:17, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > It compiles now, because Uwe changed the .lyx file (commit > > 57fd14ddf3f60dda9481eaf7c4a91bd8468a3c9a) Before it was not compilable by > > lyx2.1 (but is compilable by lyx2.06) > > > > I get UserGuide.lyx

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Kornel Benko wrote: > It compiles now, because Uwe changed the .lyx file (commit > 57fd14ddf3f60dda9481eaf7c4a91bd8468a3c9a) Before it was not compilable by > lyx2.1 (but is compilable by lyx2.06) > > I get UserGuide.lyx with > > # git diff -r c42acc7cec9b37edb790fe767fa9e79d4186ca16 > li

Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 um 11:39:49, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Still, I think, someone (Jürgen?) should look into this. > > Into what? The file compiles for me. > > Jürgen It compiles now, because Uwe changed the .lyx file (commit 57fd14ddf3f60dda9481eaf7c4a91bd8468

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Kornel Benko wrote: > Still, I think, someone (Jürgen?) should look into this. Into what? The file compiles for me. Jürgen

Re: Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 09:09:50, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 08:41:21, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 01:57:32, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > > > > Am 22.05.2013 08:16, schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > > > > Removing "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}" (

Re: Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 08:41:21, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 01:57:32, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > Am 22.05.2013 08:16, schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > > Removing "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}" (as it is on 2.0.x) makes it > > > compilable. This is a regression. > > > >

Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 um 01:57:32, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 22.05.2013 08:16, schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Removing "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}" (as it is on 2.0.x) makes it > > compilable. This is a regression. > > But I already removed "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}". The German docs were > al

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2013 08:16, schrieb Kornel Benko: Removing "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}" (as it is on 2.0.x) makes it compilable. This is a regression. But I already removed "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}". The German docs were always identical in branch and master. regards Uwe

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: It makes sense to have the \foreignlanguage nested inside the option? I'm not sure LyX should be doing that. This is correct LaTeX - no matter that some commands don't like that. However, I already removed \foreignlanguage 24 hours ago as i wrote.

Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Removing "\foreignlanguage{ngerman}" (as it is on 2.0.x) makes it > compilable. This is a regression. Git bisect leads to the following commit: commit 53002538fa2f87ae732f9830f24bb819ed402a72 Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Wed Nov 28

Re: Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2013 um 00:56:29, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 22.05.2013 00:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >> The problem is that there is a \selectlanguage around that paragraph. but > >> it > >> is correct there because the paragraph is not translated. So if you reset > >> the language of th

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I can compile the document with 2.0.x. Can you compile it with 2.1git > or have you only tried 2.0.x? This is a LyX regression. I can bisect later tonight. You do not need to change the docs. Scott

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 22.05.2013 01:01, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >>> I do agree that it's strange it hasn't come up in other contexts (or >>> maybe it has). Maybe this is worth a post on tex.stackexchange.

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 01:01, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> I do agree that it's strange it hasn't come up in other contexts (or >> maybe it has). Maybe this is worth a post on tex.stackexchange.com. It >> sounds like you're confident that the LaTeX is vali

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2013 01:01, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I only saw it after your commit one month ago. But the German userGuide is still identical to that in branch. I do agree that it's strange it hasn't come up in other contexts (or maybe it has). Maybe this is worth a post on tex.stackexchange.com.

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 00:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > OK, then i will have to translate the paragraph. Strange that no user > complained about this yet. I only saw it after your commit one month ago. I think you are the only user/dev compiling the Ger

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2013 00:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The problem is that there is a \selectlanguage around that paragraph. but it is correct there because the paragraph is not translated. So if you reset the language of the whole paragraph, it compiles, right? Yes, then it compiles fine. OK, then i

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 00:30, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>> can you now compile the German and French userUuide in master? >> >> >> No, I cannot compile either. I have the same problem with both. >> Deleting the inset leads to no error in both. So I gu

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.05.2013 00:30, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: can you now compile the German and French userUuide in master? No, I cannot compile either. I have the same problem with both. Deleting the inset leads to no error in both. So I guess the "Auflistung" double error is unrelated (since I don't get it

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 21.05.2013 21:45, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >> It contains the following: >> >> ! Package enumitem Error: \csnameforeignlanguage \endcsname >> {ngerman}{labelinde >> nt=0pt, labelsep=1cm, font=\itshape , style=nextline} undefined. > > > But

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.05.2013 21:45, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: It contains the following: ! Package enumitem Error: \csnameforeignlanguage \endcsname {ngerman}{labelinde nt=0pt, labelsep=1cm, font=\itshape , style=nextline} undefined. But this is different from what you wrote before. However, the strange thin

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 21.05.2013 05:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> Yes, I see the problem with pdflatex. When compiling I first get the >> following error: >> >> LyX's automatic index sorting algorithm faced >> problems with the entry 'Auflistung'. >> Please spe

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.05.2013 05:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Yes, I see the problem with pdflatex. When compiling I first get the following error: LyX's automatic index sorting algorithm faced problems with the entry 'Auflistung'. Please specify the sorting of this entry manually, as explained in the User Gui

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-20 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 21.05.2013 um 05:51 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 20.05.2013 03:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> >> I get \endcsname errors when exporting the German User Guide to PDF with pdflatex. Bisect led me here. >>> >>> >>> I forgot to

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-20 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 20.05.2013 03:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I get \endcsname errors when exporting the German User Guide to PDF with pdflatex. Bisect led me here. I forgot to CC you on this Uwe. I'm still getting errors when trying to export the German user guide after your recent commit. I compile every

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-19 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > 2013/4/16 Uwe Stöhr : >> The branch, master, has been updated. >> >> - Log - >> >> commit 458b3bad107a988db4c0f963dde4576a3ae337d9 >> Author: Uwe Stöhr >> Date: Wed Apr 17 0

Re: [LyX master] UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision

2013-05-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
2013/4/16 Uwe Stöhr : > The branch, master, has been updated. > > - Log - > > commit 458b3bad107a988db4c0f963dde4576a3ae337d9 > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Wed Apr 17 01:13:49 2013 +0200 > > UserGuide.lyx: first step of revision >