Martin Vermeer wrote:
This is actually an ugly corner of LyX. There is no clean way to modify
the layout file tree in cases like this. But of course one could take it
philosophically and say that, just like with ERT, you're on your own if
you write your own layouts. I suppose it would be better
Martin Vermeer wrote:
This is actually an ugly corner of LyX. There is no clean way to modify
the layout file tree in cases like this. But of course one could take it
philosophically and say that, just like with ERT, you're on your own if
you write your own layouts. I suppose it would be better
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
;-)
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wrong.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
;-)
I
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout works?
Abdel.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200,
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:31:50PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:19:14AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout works?
Yes,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:17:23AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
>
> No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
;-)
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > > Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
> >
> > No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout works?
Abdel.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice that when using the IEEEtran class, ERT becomes EBT?
No... disable the pixmap cache maybe?
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Btw, did you notice
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Btw, did you notice
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:31:50PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 10:19:14AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I meant that the text in an ERT is not Red but Black, and the font
> > is also wrong. This happens for a few classes, eg. IEEEtran and AMS.
>
> Maybe related to Martin's and Richard's layout
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:17:23AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 09:09:28AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> > > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > > Btw, did you notice that when using the
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
tab button problem.
nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought that those Cannot assign to
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
tab button problem.
nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
> > tab button problem.
>
> nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought that those "Cannot
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I suspect that solving these issues might also solve the missing close
tab button problem.
nope, the close button did not automagically appeared :-(
Hmprf... I thought
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows?
Yes.
Does this happen on any document?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
display or to create a new display for the same document.
Opinions?
Abdel.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Abdel.
On Friday 24 August 2007 08:22:38 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
display or to create a new display for the same document.
Opinions?
When in doubt do what emacs does: create a new display for the same
document.
Abdel.
--
José
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be some more glitches,
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows?
Yes.
Does this happen on any document?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
display or to create a new display for the same document.
Opinions?
Abdel.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Abdel.
On Friday 24 August 2007 08:22:38 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
> display or to create a new display for the same document.
>
> Opinions?
When in doubt do what emacs does: create a new display for the same
document.
> Abdel.
--
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
> > a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
>
> Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be some more
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Fixed.
Great! Many thanks, Abdel.
However, there seems to be
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Nuisance:
- Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
This is fixed.
Problems:
- The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
However, after opening another file, the name shows up.
I don't see this bug.
- The list of
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Nuisance:
- Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
This is fixed.
Ok, thanks.
Problems:
- The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
However,
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Hmm, on second
thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
--
Enrico
Why, is that a problem? ;-)
$ rpm -qi qt4
Name: qt4 Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version :
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Hmm, on second
thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
--
Enrico
Why, is that a problem? ;-)
Not at all.
$ ./src/lyx.exe
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple BufferView or multiple
Buffer? The later would be embarrassing.
And there's
On Thursday 23 August 2007 21:31:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On third thought, maybe we should only allow Qt snaspshots,
just to be sure. Don't we already use boost snapshots?
Now that you mention it the solution is to carry our own copy of qt, then qt
and boost will be on the same level...
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple BufferView or
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Hmm, on second
thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
--
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Nuisance:
- Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
This is fixed.
Problems:
- The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
However, after opening another file, the name shows up.
I don't see this bug.
- The list of
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Nuisance:
> > - Even with only one file opened, a toolbar with a tab appears.
>
> This is fixed.
Ok, thanks.
> > Problems:
> > - The main window bar does not show the filename of a loaded file.
>
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Hmm, on second
> thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
>
> --
> Enrico
Why, is that a problem? ;-)
$ rpm -qi qt4
Name: qt4 Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Hmm, on second
> > thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
> >
> > --
> > Enrico
>
> Why, is that a problem? ;-)
Not at all.
$
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple BufferView or multiple
Buffer? The later would be embarrassing.
And there's
On Thursday 23 August 2007 21:31:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On third thought, maybe we should only allow Qt snaspshots,
> just to be sure. Don't we already use boost snapshots?
Now that you mention it the solution is to carry our own copy of qt, then qt
and boost will be on the same
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
>
> Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean multiple
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:52:00PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Hmm, on second
> > > thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:36:10PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:09:49AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Another problem: lyx allows opening multiple times the same file.
Really? I'll have a look... Do you mean
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows? Does this happen on any document? Could you please
try to disable the pixmap cache in QLPainter.cpp?
Abdel.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows?
Yes.
Does this happen on any document?
When trying to load
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
No scrollbar is present, but if you click in the window,
the view is adjusted (and the scrollbar appears). However, if
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after your commit. Before
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Here is my most recent
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
Is this on windows? Does this happen on any document? Could you please
try to disable the pixmap cache in QLPainter.cpp?
Abdel.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:25:12AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > Here is another one for you. This happens with Qt 4.1. When loading
> > a second document, lyx crashes as follows:
>
> Is this on windows?
Yes.
> Does this happen on any document?
When
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
No scrollbar is present, but if you click in the window,
the view is adjusted (and the scrollbar appears). However, if
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Crash:
> > When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
> > is out of view.
>
> I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after your
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Crash:
When loading the attached file, the cursor is not visible and the text
is out of view.
I am not sure about this one but this one is fixed:
I started seeing it after
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it is implemented but does not show up.
I solved the splash screen bug
Here
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it is implemented but does not show up.
I solved the splash screen bug
Here
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
> >>> - the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
> >>> - the
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
- the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
- the splash screen: it is
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
Thanks. Don't hesitate to complement/modify it once it is in trunk.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two notions. It will indeed add a WorkArea if it does
not
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two notions. It will indeed add
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
Year, that's the real bug :-)
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
>>> - the close tab button: it is implemented but does not show up.
>>> - the splash screen:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is my most recent patch. What is not working yet:
Btw, very nice design description. I think it is very useful.
Thanks. Don't hesitate to complement/modify it once it is in trunk.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
>
> Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two notions. It will indeed add a WorkArea if it does
not
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>
>>> Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
>>>
>>> Abdel.
>>
>> + void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
>>
>> shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
>
> It's between the two
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is a patch with this fix against latest trunk.
Abdel.
+ void LyXView::setBuffer(Buffer * newBuffer)
shouldn't this be called something like addBuffer ?
It's between the two
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
> need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
A/
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I actually like this behavior. Why having a scrollbar if there is no
need for it?
Exactly, but then the scrollbar pops up even if it is useless. ;-)
Year, that's the real bug :-)
Abdel.
92 matches
Mail list logo
