On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:47 AM, José Matos wrote:
>> The above is just for historical reference. I agree with you solution. :-)
>
> OK unless there are objections in the next couple days I will do so.
Done at 2c6eab54.
Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:47 AM, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 July 2013 18:53:00 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> José or Martin,
>>
>> Is there a natural reason for AGU and docbook to go together? When I
>> google for "AGU docbook", I see mostly LyX links.
>
> IIRC At the time when Martin include
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 18:53:00 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> José or Martin,
>
> Is there a natural reason for AGU and docbook to go together? When I
> google for "AGU docbook", I see mostly LyX links.
IIRC At the time when Martin included this AGU was testing/implementing a new
format based on d
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> We can add some note comment on the top of the document.
I went with this suggestion for now because it is seems the least
controversial. I would prefer to have the document in the attic (for
the correct reason now, I think). Here is the part
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> We can set the default format to LyXHTML and we can put a note at the
>> top along the lines of "exporting to PDF of this document is currently
>> not working".
>
> Actually I'm not against moving this to attic, but th
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> We can set the default format to LyXHTML and we can put a note at the
> top along the lines of "exporting to PDF of this document is currently
> not working".
Actually I'm not against moving this to attic, but the proper reason is
obsoleteness, not the fact that it creates
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> >> When I try to export AGU_article to a pdf (I appear to have the
>> >
>> > You mean that AGU_article which is meant to be for docbook stall with pdf?
>>
>> Yes, on my system and on Kornel's. jadetex (Open Jade) give
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> When I try to export AGU_article to a pdf (I appear to have the
> >
> > You mean that AGU_article which is meant to be for docbook stall with pdf?
>
> Yes, on my system and on Kornel's. jadetex (Open Jade) gives errors
> (listed in this thread) and then stalls.
And wha
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> When I try to export AGU_article to a pdf (I appear to have the
>
> You mean that AGU_article which is meant to be for docbook stall with pdf?
Yes, on my system and on Kornel's. jadetex (Open Jade) gives errors
(list
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> When I try to export AGU_article to a pdf (I appear to have the
You mean that AGU_article which is meant to be for docbook stall with pdf?
Pavel
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:33 AM, José Matos wrote:
>>> On Friday 17 May 2013 23:46:18 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Hi José, here are some more errors for you to chase
I g
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:33 AM, José Matos wrote:
>> On Friday 17 May 2013 23:46:18 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> Hi José, here are some more errors for you to chase
>>>
>>> I get these when trying to export AGU_article.lyx to ps2pdf.
>>>
>>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:33 AM, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 17 May 2013 23:46:18 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Hi José, here are some more errors for you to chase
>>
>> I get these when trying to export AGU_article.lyx to ps2pdf.
>>
>> Also note that another problem is that LyX hangs for me when t
On Friday 17 May 2013 23:46:18 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Hi José, here are some more errors for you to chase
>
> I get these when trying to export AGU_article.lyx to ps2pdf.
>
> Also note that another problem is that LyX hangs for me when trying to
> export AGU_article.lyx to ps2pdf. It would be
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2013 22:05:09 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The patch attached fixes the first problem you describe the "DUMMY"
> references (pun intended). :-D
>
> I will try to chase and fix the others.
Hi José, here are some more errors fo
On 04/13/2013 02:11 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Friday 12 April 2013 18:00:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
José Matos wrote:
The patch attached fixes the first problem you describe the "DUMMY" references
(pun intended). :-D
Dunno how much related but I remember docbook&dummy problem reported in bug
track
José Matos wrote:
> The question between docbook 4 (mostly 4.5) and docbook 5 is the same that we
> are having in another thread regarding python.
I must admit that I'm so confused, that I don't even know what version do we
support now(4?).
And what is the relation between SGML and XML version o
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:32 PM, José Matos wrote:
> The question between docbook 4 (mostly 4.5) and docbook 5 is the same that we
> are having in another thread regarding python.
Interesting coincidence. I guess major releases are a good time to
talk about changing version support.
> docbook 4
On Saturday 13 April 2013 14:24:52 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> There was someone interested in adding support for DocBook 5:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8444
>
> Let me know if there's anything I can do to test.
>
> Scott
The question between docbook 4 (mostly 4.5) and docbook 5 is the same th
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 PM, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 12 April 2013 23:30:16 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Your patch does help. Here is the output I get now from db2pdf (exit code is
>> 8):
>>
>
> Yes, I get the same. I think that the reasonable course of action is to
> update the docbook
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:32 PM, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 12 April 2013 23:31:55 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> OK, I will apply the patch then unless someone disagrees. José cannot
>> test because he does not use sgmltools.
>>
>> Scott
>
> You can test easily if you create a new document from
On Friday 12 April 2013 23:30:16 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Your patch does help. Here is the output I get now from db2pdf (exit code is
> 8):
>
Yes, I get the same. I think that the reasonable course of action is to update
the docbook support for 4.5 (released in 2006).
I will look in to this b
On Friday 12 April 2013 18:00:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > The patch attached fixes the first problem you describe the "DUMMY"
> > references (pun intended). :-D
>
> Dunno how much related but I remember docbook&dummy problem reported in bug
> tracker.
> Pavel
I think that you
On Friday 12 April 2013 23:31:55 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> OK, I will apply the patch then unless someone disagrees. José cannot
> test because he does not use sgmltools.
>
> Scott
You can test easily if you create a new document from templates. There is a
simple docbook template that will wor
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 10:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, José Matos wrote:
>>>
>>> The sgmltools (that I don't have installed) will most probably use the
>>> latex
>>> way so I agree with you that the ps backend i
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2013 22:05:09 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I have different errors since I only have docbook 4.5 installed.
>
> The patch attached fixes the first problem you describe the "DUMMY"
> references (pun intended). :-D
>
> I will tr
José Matos wrote:
> The patch attached fixes the first problem you describe the "DUMMY"
> references (pun intended). :-D
Dunno how much related but I remember docbook&dummy problem reported in bug
tracker.
Pavel
On 04/10/2013 10:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, José Matos wrote:
The sgmltools (that I don't have installed) will most probably use the latex
way so I agree with you that the ps backend is the way to go (even if in the
end it is the same transformation path).
O
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 22:05:09 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I tried to test docbook_article with db2pdf and I get errors. Here are a few:
>
> openjade:/tmp/lyx_tmpdir.n10355/lyx_tmpbuf2/docbook_article.sgml:113:68:E:
> element "DUMMY" undefined
> openjade:/tmp/lyx_tmpdir.n10355/lyx_tmpbuf2/docboo
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 April 2013 16:42:09 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> FWIW I am using the db2xxx tools (db2dvi db2html db2pdf db2ps db2rtf) from
> the docbook-utils project http://sources.redhat.com/docbook-tools/
Ah, I had not seen that. I just install
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:20 AM, José Matos wrote:
> The sgmltools (that I don't have installed) will most probably use the latex
> way so I agree with you that the ps backend is the way to go (even if in the
> end it is the same transformation path).
OK, it sounds like it makes sense to add supp
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 16:42:09 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Currently the converter chain for DocBook -> PDF (ps2pdf) is the following:
>
> docbook -> DVI
> DVI -> Postscript
> Postscript -> PDF (ps2pdf)
>
> The converter for docbook -> DVI is: sgmltools -b dvi $$i
>
> sgmltools has a backe
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> The docbook stuff is pretty old, and it may be that sgmltools didn't have
> the ps backend last time anyone looked at this. I don't know. Perhaps José
> will tell us.
OK, I'll wait to see what José says.
> But yes: If we want to support the
On 04/02/2013 04:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Currently the converter chain for DocBook -> PDF (ps2pdf) is the following:
docbook -> DVI
DVI -> Postscript
Postscript -> PDF (ps2pdf)
The converter for docbook -> DVI is: sgmltools -b dvi $$i
sgmltools has a backend for postscript also.
34 matches
Mail list logo
