Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an executable

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an executable

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an executable script. Here is a patch that changes lib/configure.py to look only for the modular installation. Richard, LyXBlogger 0.35 has been released, which must be called as a

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

>> > >> I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python > >> module instead of as an executable script. Here is a patch that changes > >> lib/configure.py to look only for the modular installation. > >> > > Richard, > > > > LyXBlogger 0.35 has been released, which

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/16/2010 01:13 PM, Jack Desert wrote: El Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:16:38 -0500 Jack Desertjackdesert...@gmail.com escribió: El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheckrgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/16/2010 01:13 PM, Jack Desert wrote: El Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:16:38 -0500 Jack Desert escribió: El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:16:38 -0500 Jack Desert jackdesert...@gmail.com escribió: El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:16:38 -0500 Jack Desert escribió: > El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 > rgheck escribió: > > Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. > > I've also committed part of this patch > > > I have

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an executable

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck escribió: > Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. > I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:07:04 -0500 Jack Desert jackdesert...@gmail.com escribió: El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:03:45 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: \converter html blog lyxblogger

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/05/2010 05:14 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Would you consider adding a META tag to the LyXHTML output? That will make it more predictable to tell which xhtml format is being used. Some examples from other converters: META name=GENERATOR content=hevea 1.10 meta name=GENERATOR content=TtH 3.85

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

Good idea. It'll output something like: meta name=GENERATOR content=LyX 2.0.0svn / where the content is determined by the PACKAGE_STRING macro in config.h and so can change. I assume it will always begin LyX, though. rh Sounds good. Let me know when it's finalized and I'll add it to

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/05/2010 06:37 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Good idea. It'll output something like: meta name=GENERATOR content=LyX 2.0.0svn / where the content is determined by the PACKAGE_STRING macro in config.h and so can change. I assume it will always begin LyX, though. rh Sounds good. Let me

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:07:04 -0500 Jack Desert escribió: > El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:03:45 -0400 > rgheck escribió: > > On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: > > > > > > If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: > > > \converter html blog

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/05/2010 05:14 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Would you consider adding a META tag to the LyXHTML output? That will make it more predictable to tell which xhtml format is being used. Some examples from other converters: Good idea. It'll output something like: where the content is

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

> Good idea. It'll output something like: > > where the content is determined by the PACKAGE_STRING macro in config.h > and so can change. I assume it will always begin "LyX", though. > > rh > Sounds good. Let me know when it's finalized and I'll add it to LyXBlogger. -Jack --

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/05/2010 06:37 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Good idea. It'll output something like: where the content is determined by the PACKAGE_STRING macro in config.h and so can change. I assume it will always begin "LyX", though. rh Sounds good. Let me know when it's finalized and I'll add it

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

rgheck wrote: On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml-blog and html-blog converters. This is particularly important in 2.0, it

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/02/2010 04:51 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: rgheck wrote: On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml-blog and html-blog

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

rgheck wrote: > On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: > >> Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) > >> let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install > >> both the xhtml->blog and html->blog converters. This is particularly > >>

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 04/02/2010 04:51 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: rgheck wrote: On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml->blog and

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch, but as I was about to commit the whole thing another issue occurred to me. Sorry! Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. Excellent. Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml-blog and html-blog converters. This is

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml-blog and html-blog converters. This is particularly important in 2.0, it seems to me, since

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch, but as I was about to commit the whole thing another issue occurred to me. Sorry! Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

> Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. Excellent. > Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) > let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install > both the xhtml->blog and html->blog converters. This is

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/30/2010 04:15 PM, Jack Desert wrote: Actually, the first issue is that, especially since 2.0 will (hopefully) let the user choose conversion paths, etc, we can go ahead and install both the xhtml->blog and html->blog converters. This is particularly important in 2.0, it seems to me,

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/28/2010 08:52 PM, Jack Desert wrote: LyxBlogger is specifically set up to parse the LyXHTML and eLyXer formats. Some features may turn out strange using TtH, Hevea, or latex2html, simply because the regular expressions may not find what they're looking for. So yes, let's leave the

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/28/2010 08:52 PM, Jack Desert wrote: LyxBlogger is specifically set up to parse the LyXHTML and eLyXer formats. Some features may turn out strange using TtH, Hevea, or latex2html, simply because the regular expressions may not find what they're looking for. So yes, let's leave the

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

LyxBlogger is specifically set up to parse the LyXHTML and eLyXer formats. Some features may turn out strange using TtH, Hevea, or latex2html, simply because the regular expressions may not find what they're looking for. So yes, let's leave the html - blog converter inside the if block so

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

> LyxBlogger is specifically set up to parse the LyXHTML and eLyXer formats. > Some features may turn out strange using TtH, Hevea, or latex2html, simply > because the regular expressions may not find what they're looking for. > > So yes, let's leave the html -> blog converter inside the "if"

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

So what I'd suggest is adding the LyX blogger format and the two converters. By default, the LyXHTML one would be chosen, since that will be a shorter path. But, as I said, both may be available, if we can finish the patch to which I alluded. rh Sounds reasonable. Here is a new patch

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: \converter html blog lyxblogger $$i You can allow it to add this even if elyxer isn't installed. Or is there some reason we want to make sure that lyxblogger only runs on elyxer's

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:03:45 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: \converter html blog lyxblogger $$i You can allow it to add this even if elyxer isn't installed. Or is

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

> So what I'd suggest is adding the LyX blogger format and the two > converters. By default, the LyXHTML one would be chosen, since that will > be a shorter path. But, as I said, both may be available, if we can > finish the patch to which I alluded. > > rh > Sounds reasonable. Here is a

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: \converter html blog "lyxblogger $$i" "" You can allow it to add this even if elyxer isn't installed. Or is there some reason we want to make sure that lyxblogger only runs on elyxer's

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:03:45 -0400 rgheck escribió: > On 03/27/2010 03:46 PM, Jack Desert wrote: > > > > If eLyXer is installed, it also adds: > > \converter html blog "lyxblogger $$i" "" > > > > > You can allow it to add this even if elyxer isn't

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/25/2010 05:59 PM, Jack Desert wrote: I have created a patch that automatically sets up LyxBlogger file formats and converter definitions for both of the supported input types: LyXHTML and eLyXer. For the LyXHTML format, it adds: \converter xhtml xblog lyxblogger $$i

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

On 03/25/2010 05:59 PM, Jack Desert wrote: I have created a patch that automatically sets up LyxBlogger file formats and converter definitions for both of the supported input types: LyXHTML and eLyXer. For the LyXHTML format, it adds: \converter xhtml xblog "lyxblogger $$i"