Helge Hafting wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Helge Hafting wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch wi
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
| >>
| >> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
| >>
| >> What was wrong with my patch fr
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
| >>
| >> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
| >>
| >> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
| >>
| >
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
>>
>> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
>>
>> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
>>
>
> I tried this with todays svn.
> The patch will indeed preve
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch will indeed prevent scrolling after key-release,
so it fixe
Sorry for the previous test of event4 - I patched the wrong tree. :-(
event4 solves the problem for pageup/pagedown! I can scroll through
half the userguide at 100% cpu, release the key, and LyX stops instantly!
This is very good.
The scrollbar still overshoots. I can only make it overshoot sl
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
(I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| The idea of the patch was to drop those events if
| the last event wasn't processed.
For mouse clicks, arrow keys, etc that is kindo ok, but for regular
chars it is not acceptable. If I press 'abc' really fast, I still
ex
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| > | Peter> only page up
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| >
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | |
| > | | Peter> I've reproduced the
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:57:28 José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
> proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error
> that had evaded our search us before.
There are important patches that are being discuss
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
>> to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
>> it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
>> to drop any key. But what is
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
to drop any key. But what is the alternative? A XSync call cou
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
> Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
>
> Peter> static const in
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> | > writes:
>> | > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
>>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > (At the time I felt that the patch was a bit hackish, X11 only and had
> | > too little testing.)
Do you know QApplication::syncX, but it is maybe call to XSync with false.
I've also used XSync in the scroll event but then the scrolling behavior
was really bad.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > writes:
> | > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | |
> | | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> | | Peter> onl
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
>> Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
>> Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> | Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
> | Pet
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > writes:
| > | > | | | >>>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | |
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | | Peter> I've reproduced the e
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page up/dow
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page up/dow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code
This drawer patch should go in:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3500
Stefan
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
evaded
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter> static const int delayed_keys =
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
| Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
|
|
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter> static const int delayed_keys = Qt::Key_PageDown |
Peter
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> (I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
> already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
> valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
I've reproduced the error a
Peter Kümmel wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
I still think my scrolling patch
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=117968102228177&w=2
is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
with keys you will
> Objections, patches to consider, etc...
Only a patch: I would like to have the next unicodesymbols patch in because this is another step to
better unicode support:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg118499.html
If this is too late for pre1 it would be nice if it can go in
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> I still think my scrolling patch
>> http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=117968102228177&w=2
>> is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
>> with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
>> with keys you will see an
On Friday 25 May 2007 16:08:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> On Mac (and probably other platforms, depending on the used font) the
> cursor movement is broken (it skips lines). Moreover the target_x
> code in Cursor is broken. I am working on a fix right now. I consider
> it a bug which shouldn'
On Friday 25 May 2007 20:16:40 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Farsi...
I don't forget my promisses. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> I still think my scrolling patch
> http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel&m=117968102228177&w=2
> is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
> with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
> with keys you will see an improvment.
What ar
On Friday 25 May 2007 17:48:30 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Are we sure that the format is frozen, or will you allow further
> changes?
There is no such guarantee yet. Why should we care? :-)
The premise is there for 1.5.0. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate.
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate.
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
There is no pending (listings) patch in my tree and the fact that
shift-page down no longer crashes lyx make
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
> proposed a
> week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
> evaded our search us before.
>
> We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi, are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1
José> I had proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to
José> avoid any error that had evaded our search us before.
José> We have bugs but nothing so glari
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the
45 matches
Mail list logo
