Re: Use Qt 5.9.0 for Mac/Win binaries?

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:41:56AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I would expect LTS to be a safe, conservative choice, but I may be > wrong. I think you are right. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Use Qt 5.9.0 for Mac/Win binaries?

2017-04-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 10.04.2017 a las 09:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: > > > I have not followed the recent Qt development, but I find it depressing > > that we have to use the latst and greatest because anything older has > > significant issues. I

Re: Use Qt 5.9.0 for Mac/Win binaries?

2017-04-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 10.04.2017 a las 09:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: I have not followed the recent Qt development, but I find it depressing that we have to use the latst and greatest because anything older has significant issues. I would expect LTS to be a safe, conservative choice, but I may be wrong.

Re: Use Qt 5.9.0 for Mac/Win binaries?

2017-04-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 10/04/2017 à 06:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Dear all, I would like to propose that we release our LyX 2.3.0 alpha binaries for Mac and Windows with Qt 5.9.0beta1 and that we release our final LyX 2.3.0 binaries with the final release of Qt 5.9.0. Hello, A question: do we have compelling