On 10/27/2010 07:50 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
For some numbers a glimpse of the old battles:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg126692.html
I am surprised this was only three years ago.
Andre', feeling younger suddenly.
Ah, we didn't have those in-depth disc
On 10/27/2010 09:42 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Guess what? You fix it and all InsetDialog based dialogs will be fixed :-P
Abdel.
I guessed something different. Something like that the author of the
InsetDialog class would increment the beauty of his design to such a
level that eve
> Guess what? You fix it and all InsetDialog based dialogs will be fixed :-P
>
> Abdel.
>
I guessed something different. Something like that the author of the
InsetDialog class would increment the beauty of his design to such a
level that even this little Restore button in the lower left would
beh
On 10/27/2010 07:50 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
For some numbers a glimpse of the old battles:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg126692.html
I am surprised this was only three years ago.
Andre', feeling younger suddenly.
Ah, we didn't have those in-depth disc
> For some numbers a glimpse of the old battles:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg126692.html
>
> I am surprised this was only three years ago.
>
> Andre', feeling younger suddenly.
>
Ah, we didn't have those in-depth discussions for a long time.
Anyway, on a more seriou
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Well, most of the controller code was useless indirection and
> complication (most of the controller code was necessitating almost
> the same amount of code in the gui implementation). So I am ready to
> bet that, at feature equal
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:51:04AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> I could be wrong, but I think we now have much more application
> logic in the Gui* classes then we did before the removal of all the
> Controller* classes. Perhaps alot of that could just be copied over,
> but it is still more work.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 03:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> On 10/24/2010 07:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2010 12:31 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
Hi, I'm new here. I only recently joined this list. I've recently
acquired an iPad, and
On 10/25/2010 01:51 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/25/2010 03:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 10/24/2010 07:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/24/2010 12:31 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
Hi, I'm new here. I only recently joined this list. I've recently
acquired an iPad, and found myself wanting
On 10/25/2010 03:52 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 10/24/2010 07:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/24/2010 12:31 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
Hi, I'm new here. I only recently joined this list. I've recently
acquired an iPad, and found myself wanting to be able to take notes
with embedded equa
On 10/24/2010 07:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/24/2010 12:31 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
Hi, I'm new here. I only recently joined this list. I've recently
acquired an iPad, and found myself wanting to be able to take notes
with embedded equations and such. AFAICT, no such app yet exists.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> I think maybe the way to go is to support the fledgling attempts to port Qt
> to the iPad. See this thread:
> http://lists.trolltech.com/pipermail/qt-interest/2010-April/021359.html
> If that were done, then LyX would run no problem.
>
I th
On 10/24/2010 12:31 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
Hi, I'm new here. I only recently joined this list. I've recently acquired an
iPad, and found myself wanting to be able to take notes with embedded equations
and such. AFAICT, no such app yet exists.
Then I thought about LyX. Even if one was n
13 matches
Mail list logo
