Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 17:34 schrieb Leuven, E.:
> Kornel wrote:
> > Load a document with a figure which is _not_ displayed in lyx.
> > Go to graphics dialog->Extra options
> > Enable "Show in LyX"
> > ==> OK button remains gray.
>
> should work now...
confirmed. I like it.
Kornel
-
Kornel wrote:
> Load a document with a figure which is _not_ displayed in lyx.
> Go to graphics dialog->Extra options
> Enable "Show in LyX"
> ==> OK button remains gray.
should work now...
> Load a document with a figure which is _not_ displayed in lyx.
> Go to graphics dialog->Extra options
> Enable "Show in LyX"
> ==> OK button remains gray.
thanks, will have a look...
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 14:44 schrieb Leuven, E.:
> José wrote:
> > It seems to work for me.
> > I have tried to change an existing document and to insert a new figure.
> > It worked in both cases.
>
Load a document with a figure which is _not_ displayed in lyx.
Go to graphics dialog->Extr
José wrote:
> It seems to work for me.
> I have tried to change an existing document and to insert a new figure.
> It worked in both cases.
thanks
On Friday 03 November 2006 11:36 am, Leuven, E. wrote:
> (would be nice if someone can try it out...)
It seems to work for me.
I have tried to change an existing document and to insert a new figure. It
worked in both cases.
--
José Abílio
From: José Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If no one shouts until tomorrow you can put in.
it is in:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15707
(would be nice if someone can try it out...)
José wrote:
> If no one shouts until tomorrow you can put in.
ok, will do...
On Thursday 02 November 2006 1:31 pm, Leuven, E. wrote:
> moreover, this way we avoid clutter on the dialog (presenting too many
> options at once) while having the main output options (the ones we care
> about most) on the first tab.
>
> i think this makes sense in a common use context, and i like
> "Edwin" == Leuven, E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> JML à dit:
>> Personally, I would put the "show in LyX" part at the bottom.
Edwin> i ended up putting it under the extra tab:
Excellent.
JMarc
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
[...]
> > Essentially, we should replace the converter from postscript to pdf
> > as follows:
> >
> > pspdf13 -dAutoRotatePages#/None $$i $$o
>
> why ps2pdf13??
> This is a regression. It should be ps2pdf,
> "Edwin" == Leuven, E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> (sorry for messing up the thread but i am on sucky ms webmail
Edwin> atm...) what about this then:
Edwin> http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g.png
Edwin> only new layout + separate setting of scaling in output
Personally, I would put the "
(sorry for messing up the thread but i am on sucky ms webmail atm...)
what about this then:
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g.png
only new layout + separate setting of scaling in output
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:34:30AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>>> I am wondering if it is worth trying such a check when deciding whether
>>> ps2pdf or epstopdf is to be used, instead of defining a furth
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:34:30AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I am wondering if it is worth trying such a check when deciding whether
> > ps2pdf or epstopdf is to be used, instead of defining a further pdf4
> format.
>
> How much
Georg Baum schrieb:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:23 schrieb Herbert Voss:
>> ps2pdf _and_ epstopdf uses both ghostscript ...
>> sometimes ghostscript is too clever and rotates parts of the images,
>> which shouldn't. In this case a -dAutoRotatePages=/None did the trick.
>
> Yes. Adding that
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:09 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> I am wondering if it is worth trying such a check when deciding whether
> ps2pdf or epstopdf is to be used, instead of defining a further pdf4
format.
How much work would that be? At the moment I tend to prefer the first
solution I
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 22:23 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> ps2pdf _and_ epstopdf uses both ghostscript ...
> sometimes ghostscript is too clever and rotates parts of the images,
> which shouldn't. In this case a -dAutoRotatePages=/None did the trick.
Yes. Adding that as commandline option to ps2p
Georg Baum schrieb:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:05 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:46:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>>
But I simply used the default converter chosen by LyX and the
> rotation
was actually depending on using
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:31:26PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I see the same behaviour, but I don't agree with the solution. The problem
> here is that the image is detected by LyX as PS, not EPS, because the
> first line reads
>
> %!PS-Adobe-2.0
>
> and not
>
> %!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-2.0
>
> T
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:05 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:46:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > But I simply used the default converter chosen by LyX and the
rotation
> > > was actually depending on using latex or pdflatex.
>
Michael Gerz wrote:
If this is the case, I don't like the new tabs. If a user inserts a new
graphics, he is more concerned about LaTeX output than about how his
graphics is shown in LyX. The dialog suggests the opposite.
I agree. The basic output settings (filename, size in the LaTeX
document
Leuven, E. wrote:
i reorganized the first tab as follows:
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g1.png
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g2.png
what do you think?
Do "Display" and "Scale(%)" refer to output in LyX? It's not really clear.
If this is the case, I don't like the new tabs. If a user inserts
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:46:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > But I simply used the default converter chosen by LyX and the rotation
> > was actually depending on using latex or pdflatex.
>
> Then we might need to change the default converter. Do you have an exampl
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> But I simply used the default converter chosen by LyX and the rotation
> was actually depending on using latex or pdflatex.
Then we might need to change the default converter. Do you have an example
file? I don't remember seeing this with the default converter.
> So, I
> Perhaps you could also think about separating the output "scale" from
> the "width" widget. I still find that very misleading and inconvenient.
ok, i'll have a look
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:45:26AM +0100, Leuven, E. wrote:
> >
> >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> > The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
> >>
> >> yeah, it does (but i guess that this is sec
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:45:26AM +0100, Leuven, E. wrote:
>
>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> > The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
>>
>> yeah, it does (but i guess that this is secondary)
Nevertheless it is confusing if one "output" setting does also influ
Leuven, E. wrote:
> what do you think?
I like it.
Perhaps you could also think about separating the output "scale" from
the "width" widget. I still find that very misleading and inconvenient.
Jürgen
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:45:26AM +0100, Leuven, E. wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> i reorganized the first tab as follows:
> >>
> >> http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g1.png
> >> http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g2.png
> >
> > The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
>
> yeah, it does (bu
Leuven, E. wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
i reorganized the first tab as follows:
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g1.png
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g2.png
The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
yeah, it does (but i guess that this is secondary)
Is it really useful to have the rota
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> i reorganized the first tab as follows:
>>
>> http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g1.png
>> http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g2.png
>
> The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
yeah, it does (but i guess that this is secondary)
> If yes, then there's maybe a usability pro
Leuven, E. wrote:
hi guys,
atm the graphics dialog looks like this:
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g.png
i reorganized the first tab as follows:
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g1.png
http://leuven.ecodip.net/lyx/g2.png
The rotation does not apply to the LyX display?
what do you think?
If n
33 matches
Mail list logo