Le 07/05/13 06:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
The advantage is that it also does something reasonable when the widget
is not doc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
> the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
Le 05/05/13 12:01, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose?
Not so sur
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> no i use 4.8.4
>
> in the patch i send, i used QHBoxLayout (which inherits from QBoxLayout) and
> that worked fine for me?
okok :) the fact that editing .ui file in vim took me shorter time than finding
how to setup QHBoxLayout in designer suggest that i should keep respec
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
>>> I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
>> could also go into branch i suppose
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose?
Not so sure
On 04/05/13 19:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons,
>> that allows for showing/hiding the extra features ?
> Where do you want to put the 'hide' button without adding next row?
The idea was to add it to the "paned window buttons", whi
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
> >
> > I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
>
> could also go into branch i suppose?
Not so sure, I had to do nasty thin
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
>
> I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose…
ed.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
P
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > like in attached
> >
>
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.h
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/ui/ViewSourceUi.ui
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 111.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to f
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> >> On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
> >>> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
> >>> I think would be an improvement?
> >> It is ver
On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
>>> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
>>> think would be an improvement?
>> It is very welcome, indeed! And what you
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she would be lost to realize that a
> double-click is needed to show back the options.
That's why the tooltip.
> Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons, that
> allows for showing/hiding the extr
On 04/05/13 09:17, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I can put this into 2.1 unless there are objections. Otherwise it's just next
> item
> in my personal patchset ;)
just searching for a collapsible qt widget or similar, there doesn't seem to be
anything :-(.
Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she wo
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > > > detecting some width/height ratio ?
> > >
> > > Hardcore version, but much easier:
>
> attached
I can put this into
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > > detecting some width/height ratio ?
> >
> > Hardcore version, but much easier:
attached
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
b/src/fr
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > detecting some width/height ratio ?
>
> Hardcore version, but much easier:
>
or
sourcewindow.tooltip="double click to hide buttons";
signal on_sourcewindow_doubleclick()
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
signal on_sourcewindow_width_changed(){
if (width<100)
option_buttons.hide();
else
option_buttons.show();
}
Pavel
On 03/05/13 00:02, Richard Heck wrote:
> This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
> widgets to reflow themselves to the bottom or something? Can we find out how
> wide and tall, catch a signal when our size changes, and then reset
> everything? I would guess this
Richard Heck wrote:
> This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
Microbutton to roll/unroll all options?
I have been fighting with vertical size and it would be nice to get even smaller
(actually now I see someone added Master perspective into options -- I worked so
On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this reques
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
> think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this request into a ticket
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticke
On 3/05/2013 7:52 a.m., Howard Rudd wrote:
Dear Lyx Developers
I have been using LyX for several years and I would like to say thanks
for producing such a brilliant piece of software. It's totally awesome.
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
I think would
24 matches
Mail list logo
