On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
You're right. I should have suggested:
./configure --with-cucumber=insets
That's it why didn't you suggest this earlier :)
Seriously, we could add the option, BUT we have to give BBB
warning at the end of configure that the
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >
> > You're right. I should have suggested:
> > ./configure --with-cucumber=insets
>
> That's it why didn't you suggest this earlier :)
>
> Seriously, we could add the option, BUT we have to give BBB
> warning at the end of configure
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
|
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
|
| Well to answer you what I think: [...]
| Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not NEW_INSETS: [...]
| My vote is 1.1.6 with ONLY NEW_TABULAR activated!
I think I'd be willing to do this for 1.1.6.
Ok then I'll do my best to fix all the "missing-feature" reports
I got till now (when time permits).
BTW.: Are you working on LyXGui-Class? I had in mind to remove all
xforms calls from
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
|
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
|
| Well to answer you what I think: [...]
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| >
| > On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > >
| > > NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
| >
| > Well to answer you what I think: [...]
| > Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not
>| > My vote is 1.1.6 with ONLY NEW_TABULAR activated!
>
> I think I'd be willing to do this for 1.1.6.
Ok then I'll do my best to fix all the "missing-feature" reports
I got till now (when time permits).
BTW.: Are you working on LyXGui-Class? I had in mind to remove all
xforms calls
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> |
> | >
> | > On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > >
> | > > NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
> | >
> | > Well to answer you
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
I think that taking a break now will be a good idea, we could then try to
aim for better support for GUII in 1.2.0, as far as I looked into it, it
will require quite a bit of work to get LyX fully GUII,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
Well to answer you what I think: [...]
Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not NEW_INSETS: [...]
So you see while the tabular-inset IS ready for
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > I think that taking a break now will be a good idea, we could then try to
> > > aim for better support for GUII in 1.2.0, as far as I looked into it, it
> > > will require quite a bit of work to get LyX
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
>
> Well to answer you what I think: [...]
> Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not NEW_INSETS: [...]
>
> So you see while the tabular-inset IS
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
| the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
| to
On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
- keep the fileformat changes localized to on version
- they also use the textinsets and the other insets that
tabular uses, better testing.
- deveopment for
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
I think that taking a break now will be a good idea, we could then try to
aim for better support for GUII in 1.2.0, as far as I looked into it, it
will require quite a bit of work to get LyX fully GUII, quite a bit of its
internals are dependent on X
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
> > | the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
> - keep the fileformat changes localized to on version
> - they also use the textinsets and the other insets that
> tabular uses, better testing.
> -
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think that taking a break now will be a good idea, we could then try to
> > aim for better support for GUII in 1.2.0, as far as I looked into it, it
> > will require quite a bit of work to get LyX fully GUII, quite a bit of its
> > internals are
Hi,
I´m currently testing the new tabular inset. Its really hoopy!
Since it is now possible to select multiple rows/columns, I would
suggest
a slightly different behaviour of some buttons in the "Cell" tab of
FormTabular.
currently, it inaktivates the toggle-line buttons and the align
ich wrote:
...
Argh, please apologize the missing realname. Sorry for that... :~|
Timm
On 17-Aug-2000 ich wrote:
Hi,
Hi Timm!
I´m currently testing the new tabular inset. Its really hoopy!
#:O) finally someone tries the stuff hopefully I don't get too much
bug reports (well I forgot my code doesn't have bugs ;), ahhem
missing features reports #:O)
Since it is
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| #:O) finally someone tries the stuff hopefully I don't get too much
| bug reports (well I forgot my code doesn't have bugs ;), ahhem
| missing features reports #:O)
You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
NEW_INSETS
On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
1.1.6 is released.
And, everybody, this code is not official 1.1.6 currently it is an
usupported feature.
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
| NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
| 1.1.6 is released.
|
| And, everybody, this code is not
On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bj=F8nnes wrote:
| =20
| You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
| NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
| 1.1.6 is
If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
Why do we need to enable NEW_INSETS too? I think that lyx-tabulars
are pretty good
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
| the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
| to release so much new code without having some brave users test it
| beforehand,
We always have at
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
| And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
| that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
|
|
| Why do we need to enable
On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
| the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
| to release so much new code without having some brave
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 12:04:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
Actually I am not
Juergen Vigna wrote:
P.S.: Do you like the new Document-Layout? Can I remove the old code?
Well, I love new layout, but under languages I need to ask if this
affects the spell checker or just the po files. The reason I ask is that
I provided a canadian dictionary for aspell. Canadians mostly
Hi,
I´m currently testing the new tabular inset. Its really hoopy!
Since it is now possible to select multiple rows/columns, I would
suggest
a slightly different behaviour of some buttons in the "Cell" tab of
FormTabular.
currently, it inaktivates the toggle-line buttons and the align
ich wrote:
>...
Argh, please apologize the missing realname. Sorry for that... :~|
Timm
On 17-Aug-2000 ich wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Timm!
> I´m currently testing the new tabular inset. Its really hoopy!
>
#:O) finally someone tries the stuff hopefully I don't get too much
bug reports (well I forgot my code doesn't have bugs ;), ahhem
missing features reports #:O)
> Since it
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| #:O) finally someone tries the stuff hopefully I don't get too much
| bug reports (well I forgot my code doesn't have bugs ;), ahhem
| missing features reports #:O)
You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
> NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
> 1.1.6 is released.
>
> And, everybody, this code is not official 1.1.6 currently it is an
> usupported
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
| > NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
| > 1.1.6 is released.
| >
| > And, everybody, this code is
On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bj=F8nnes wrote:
> | >=20
> | > You won't get a lot of reports until we turn on the NEW_TABULAR and
> | > NEW_INSETS in lyxparagraph.h. Expect the reports to pour in after
> |
>
> If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
> And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
> that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
>
Why do we need to enable NEW_INSETS too? I think that lyx-tabulars
are pretty good
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
| the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
| to release so much new code without having some brave users test it
| beforehand,
We always have at
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
| > And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
| > that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
| >
|
| Why do we need to enable
On 17 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | It might be a good idea to release soon a lyx-1.1.6-beta1 in order to do
> | the testing by those who will need to use the code. It would be a bad idea
> | to release so much new code without having some
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 12:04:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> If we want to get 1.1.6 out before Christmas you should not do that...
> And if we decide to skip 1.1.6 and go directly at 1.2.0 we should make
> that decision now, then we need to enable NEW_INSETS too.
>
> Actually I am
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: Do you like the new Document-Layout? Can I remove the old code?
Well, I love new layout, but under languages I need to ask if this
affects the spell checker or just the po files. The reason I ask is that
I provided a canadian dictionary for aspell. Canadians mostly
44 matches
Mail list logo
