It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to warrant a
release. While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a
good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lot of polish.
There are things I would like to add before release
- when a textclass is not found, revert to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to warrant a
> release. While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a
> good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lot of polish.
>
> There are things I would like to add before release
>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:30:18PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to warrant a
> release. While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a
> good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lot of polish.
>
[...]
> I'd be
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:30:18PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to warrant a
>> release. While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a
>> good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So, what else do you think should be done?
Since there have been some irritations about the moc on the users list...
Jürgen.Index: INSTALL
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/INSTALL,v
retrieving revision 1
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> So, what else do you think should be done?
>
> Since there have been some irritations about the moc on the users list...
>
> Jürgen.
That's a bit linux-specific for me. Moreover, the place to tell them this is
in the step-by-step bit
Angus Leeming wrote:
> That's a bit linux-specific for me.
Is there something other than linux? ;-)
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a
good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lot of polish.
Well, 1.3.0 has some really nasty cursor problems, e.g., if there are two minipages inside a float and you use the mouse to switch between both min
On Thursday 27 February 2003 16:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to
> >> warrant a release. While there are no real show stopper
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm not sure anymore (this is a sign that things move too fast for
>> me...). Can you show the fix again?
Alfredo> This one:
OK, it seems that Angus applied it. What would be a good (short)
description of the bug it fixes?
JM
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, it seems that Angus applied it. What would be a good (short)
> description of the bug it fixes?
>
> JMarc
I think something like:
"Preview snippets are converted twice in (almost) all cases except from
startup."
And had maybe some other disgusting undetected c
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It seems that 1.3.1 is beginning to have enough fixes in to
>> warrant a release. While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0
>> (which is a good thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:39:59AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > I have set up an automated build (twice a day) for this branch.
> >
> > The output is in ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel and the build
> > happens at 6AM and 6PM each day (PST).
>
> Hi, Sylvan.
Hel
> >
> > That should be "Hi, Kayvan."
>
> I know that. Realy I do ;-) Please accept my apologies. Sometimes my brain
> doesn't function properly.
No problem. I now have qt builds auto-generated, though I don't really
know if they work for anyone. You can grab the 1.4cvs qt RPM and try it.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - don't cause a warning message to complain about starting an already
> running timer. Just don't start it ;-)
I've just remembered that there was another mini fix to forkedcontr.C we
cooked up with Angus that was applied to HEAD. I suspect that the bug was
responsi
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> OK, it seems that Angus applied it. What would be a good (short)
>> description of the bug it fixes?
>>
>> JMarc
Alfredo> I think something like:
Alfredo> "Preview snippets are converted tw
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> - don't cause a warning message to complain about starting an
>> already running timer. Just don't start it ;-)
Alfredo> I've just remembered that there was another mini fix to
Alfredo> forke
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>
> JMarc
How can I do that? I would have to get the whole 1.3 tree?
I suspect that it's simple to replace ForkedcallsControler::time with its
cvs HEAD version. Angus, am I right?
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>>
>> JMarc
>
> How can I do that? I would have to get the whole 1.3 tree?
>
> I suspect that it's simple to replace ForkedcallsControler::time
> with its cvs HEAD version. Angus, am I right?
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>>> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>>>
>>> JMarc
>>
Thanks Angus. Yes, it's simply to replace ForkedcallsControler::timer with
the current cvs version. I'll make the patch
Alfredo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>
> JMarc
Here it is.
AlfredoIndex: forkedcontr.C
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/support/forkedcontr.C,v
retrieving revision 1.6.2.1
diff -u -p -u
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>>
>> JMarc
Alfredo> Here it is. Alfredo
Looks like something useful indeed. How confident are you that this is
(1) safe and (2) better than the ol
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks like something useful indeed. How confident are you that this is
> (1) safe and (2) better than the old code? I know this has been
> discussed over and over, but please bear with me :)
I'm pretty confident it's safe. It fixes the old code, which has a
guarantee
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Looks like something useful indeed. How confident are you that this
>> is (1) safe and (2) better than the old code? I know this has been
>> discussed over and over, but please bear with me :)
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Could you try to provide a fix for 1.3.x?
>>
>> JMarc
Alfredo> Here it is. Alfredo
I applied it. Thanks.
JMarc
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> While there are no real show stopper in 1.3.0 (which is a good
>> thing), what we have now in 1.3.1cvs gives a lot of polish.
Michael> Well, 1.3.0 has some really nasty cursor problems, e.g., if
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Michael> Well, 1.3.0 has some really nasty cursor problems, e.g., if
Michael> there are two minipages inside a float and you use the mouse
Michael> to switch between both minipages, you notice two kinds of
Michael> misbehavior: 1. Some text is selected erroneously 2. Th
27 matches
Mail list logo
