Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:39:33PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 15:24:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:21:21PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 14:58:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:10:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/20/2015 09:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >How do I email the translators directly? Do we have a script to pull the > >emails of the current translators from the po files? > > I can give you this info, as I have to do it

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 13:17:59, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:10:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 10/20/2015 09:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > >How do I email the

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On 10/20/2015 09:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: How do I email the translators directly? Do we have a script to pull the emails of the current translators from the po files? I can give you this info, as I have to do it myself from time to time. Richard

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 13:17:59, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:10:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 10/20/2015 09:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >How do I email the translators directly? Do we have a script to pull the > > >emails of the

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:21:21PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 14:58:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > Got it. > > Is there an advanatage to extracting the translators from there over > > from the individual po files? Needs some cleaning up, but:

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 14:58:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:23:51PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 13:17:59, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:10:32PM -0400,

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 15:24:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:21:21PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 um 14:58:27, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > Got it. > > > > Is there an advanatage to

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On 10/21/2015 01:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:10:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/20/2015 09:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: How do I email the translators directly? Do we have a script to pull the emails of the current translators from the po files? I can give

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:30:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 19/10/2015 19:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >Well we can adjust the timeframe if necessary (it is already delayed > >because of Qt 5.6 beta delay). If this is important or there is > >precedence then we can delay a couple

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:56:57PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > Do we want to give our translators a chance to get stuff in for 2.2.alpha? > > Or has that already been done? > > This has not been done yet. I had thought this was done at a later > stage. For example

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Le 19/10/2015 19:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Well we can adjust the timeframe if necessary (it is already delayed because of Qt 5.6 beta delay). If this is important or there is precedence then we can delay a couple of weeks. I would say it is only important before beta. JMarc

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:54:32AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:56:57PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > > > > Do we want to give our translators a chance to get stuff in for 2.2.alpha? > > > Or has that already been done? > > > > This has not

Re: Translations and 2.2.alpha?

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:56:57PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > Do we want to give our translators a chance to get stuff in for 2.2.alpha? > Or has that already been done? This has not been done yet. I had thought this was done at a later stage. For example it seems for 2.1.0 it was done

Translations and 2.2.alpha?

Do we want to give our translators a chance to get stuff in for 2.2.alpha? Or has that already been done? Richard