On Monday 14 January 2002 2:35 am, you wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Attached is a small test file. Try to view the DVI and lyx core dumps.
>
> Not crashing for me now. Confirm fixed please.
It was my broked std::count. Fixed in my tree although I need to rewrite it
On Saturday 12 January 2002 11:56 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:02:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Attached is a small test file. Try to view the DVI and lyx core dumps.
> >
> > Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now
view
> > the DVI, but if
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Attached is a small test file. Try to view the DVI and lyx core dumps.
>
> Not crashing for me now. Confirm fixed please.
>
> | Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:02:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Attached is a small test file. Try to view the DVI and lyx core dumps.
>
> Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now view
> the DVI, but if you highlight the note and "cut" it then, again, lyx core
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> What a mess.
>
> But it is "logical" bold, isn't it? So one could hack it in by providing
> another 'char' argument for whichFont()... Not nice, though.
Math versions are supposed be orthogonal.
(fontmath.ltx) | normal bold
-
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
> > > Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to MathTextCodes?
> >
> > No, because the bold symbols are taken from several fonts.
> > For example:
> > cmbx for letters and digits
> > cmmib
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> from amsbsy.sty
> \DeclareRobustCommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{%
>\begingroup
>\let\@nomath\@gobble \mathversion{bold}%
>\math@atom{#1}{%
>\mathchoice%
> {\hbox{$\m@th\displaystyle#1$}}%
> {\hbox{$\m@th\textstyle#1$
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>No, because the bold symbols are taken from several fonts.
>>For example:
>> cmbx for letters and digits
>> cmmib for greek letters and some symbols
>> cmbsy for over symbols
>>
>
> What a mess.
>
> But it is "logical" bold, isn't it? So one could hack it in by providing
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:18:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
> > > or even better, \bm from bm.sty
> >
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> There is an "use amsmath" - button, which (when enabled) loads
> by default the amsbsy.sty and you'll have the \boldsymbol{}
I thought the purpose of the game was to get visual feedback and no red
'boldsymbol' in a nice blue formula.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
> or even better, \bm from bm.sty
What is the difference?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:03:25PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> YES PLEASE! Although you'll then need a validate function to include bm.sty.
I guess I'd need a decent validate() anyway at some point of time...
Currently the AMS feature is included unconditionally and I don't even know
what it is
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
> > or even better, \bm from bm.sty
>
> Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
> Should I just add a 'L
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2002 3:45 pm, you wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>>
>>>But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
>>>or even better, \bm from bm.sty
>>>
>>Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
>>Should
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
>>But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
>>or even better, \bm from bm.sty
>>
>
> Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
> Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to MathTextCodes?
\boldmat
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 3:45 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
> > or even better, \bm from bm.sty
>
> Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
> Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to Math
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 3:43 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:36:16PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > \newcommand{\bmath}[1]{\mbox{ \boldmath $ \! #1 \! $ \unboldmath }}
>
> Why you use the above definition and not
> \newcommand{\bmath}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath$#1$\unboldmath}}
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:43:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But a better option is to use \boldsymbol from amsmath.sty,
> or even better, \bm from bm.sty
Does this fit well into the new font stuff?
Should I just add a 'LM_TC_BM' to MathTextCodes?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:36:16PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2002 3:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:54:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What exactly should 'boldmath' do on screen?
> >
> > Just 'bolden' everything?
But not that the \boldma
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 3:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:54:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> What exactly should 'boldmath' do on screen?
>
> Just 'bolden' everything?
Yes. Even greek.
This .tex file produces nice LaTeX output.
Angus
\documentclass{article}
\new
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:54:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What do you exactly do?
>
> Indeed, I can't reproduce this now!
I had indeed a crash before starting in the debugger but could not reprouce
it once running under gdb. So there is something fishy...
> Ie, lyx used to be unable to
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 1:24 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:02:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now
view
> > the DVI, but if you highlight the note and "cut" it then, again, lyx core
> > dumps.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:02:19PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now view
> the DVI, but if you highlight the note and "cut" it then, again, lyx core
> dumps.
What do you exactly do?
Insert->Note after the T
highlight the T
mo
Attached is a small test file. Try to view the DVI and lyx core dumps.
Here's another one. Put the offending "T" in a note inset. You can now view
the DVI, but if you highlight the note and "cut" it then, again, lyx core
dumps.
Angus
#LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info see http://www
24 matches
Mail list logo
