On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok I got xml.cpp to compile.
>
> I have not made it do anything yet...
> (except parse UserGuide.lyx.xml successfully.)
A small step to Lars a large leap to LyX? ;-)
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Ok I got xml.cpp to compile.
>>
>> I have not made it do anything yet...
>> (except parse UserGuide.lyx.xml successfully.)
>
| A small step to Lars a large leap
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Either a lib or xml parser for spirit.
| There are examples of same in the repository at spirit.sf.net. If you want
| any help, just holler. The spirit-users list is jolly helpful.
Ok. I need some help.
I have had a look
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Either a lib or xml parser for spirit.
>
| There are examples of same in the repository at spirit.sf.net. If you want
| any help, just holler. The spirit-users list is jolly helpful.
Ok. I need some he
Please add contents to this page about thoughs on the DTD, the parser,
general xml format. If we need validation. Can we use boost::spirit?
expat? libxml2? Are there other options?
Should the layout files also be changed to xml? what about
preferences, lastfiles etc?
http://wiki.lyx.org
Please add contents to this page about thoughs on the DTD, the parser,
general xml format. If we need validation. Can we use boost::spirit?
expat? libxml2? Are there other options?
Should the layout files also be changed to xml? what about
preferences, lastfiles etc?
http://wiki.lyx.org
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The DTD for an XML format (or, if you prefer, the XSchema for an XML
| format) is like the header file for a C++ class. A file with an XML
| look is the *implementation
Okay, first, an apology. Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Culpa.
I always seem to make this same mistake with XML: I assume they
designed it to do more than it does.
I assumed that, given a DTD, an XML parser could tokenize the various
tag names. It can't. Mea Culpa.
I also assumed that, give a DTD
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | The DTD for an XML format (or, if you prefer, the XSchema for an XML
> | format) is like the header file for a C++ class. A file with "an XML
> | lo
Okay, first, an apology. Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Culpa.
I always seem to make this same mistake with XML: I assume they
designed it to do more than it does.
I assumed that, given a DTD, an XML parser could tokenize the various
tag names. It can't. Mea Culpa.
I also assumed that, give a DTD
Hi!
I made a small patch to include an alt role=tex element in
equations when writing Docbook XML.
This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
What do you think?
Cheers
/Andreas
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi!
I made a small patch to include an alt role=tex element in
equations when writing Docbook XML.
This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
What do you think?
What
José wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi!
I made a small patch to include an alt role=tex element in
equations when writing Docbook XML.
This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
What do you think
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Sigh, it's forgotten attachment day, again.
No problem. :-)
Please add it also to the SGML version. :-)
The SGML already has the alt tag (without role) and no MathML.
I added the role=tex so you can see if it works for you.
Hi!
I made a small patch to include an element in
equations when writing Docbook XML.
This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
What do you think?
Cheers
/Andreas
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a small patch to include an element in
> equations when writing Docbook XML.
>
> This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
> the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
>
>
José wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a small patch to include an element in
> equations when writing Docbook XML.
>
> This works like a charm with db2latex and still produces MathML with
> the docbook-xsl stylesheets.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> Sigh, it's forgotten attachment day, again.
No problem. :-)
> > Please add it also to the SGML version. :-)
>
> The SGML already has the tag (without role) and no MathML.
> I added the role="tex" so you can see if it works for
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi,
here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
Notice that the ChangeLog didn't refered that function changed, docbook in
this case. I have fixed that. So your first patch is commited,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
Notice that the ChangeLog didn't refered that function changed, docbook in
this case. I have fixed that. So your first patch is commited,
to add this to your preferences file:
\format docbook-xml xml Docbook (xml)
The important aspect here is that we decide that the format is xml based
because the string xml appears here in the 3rd field.
I can insert this also via Tools-Preferences-Format
Is this clear?
From here
Hi José !
I checked out 1.4.0cvs and finally got it to compile on MacOSX.
I also found the Format dialog, no problem.
The main PITA was to install all the right SGML and XML files and get
the catalogs right so that sgmltools and saxon work (I mainly use SGML
right now but want to switch to XML
the Format dialog, no problem.
The main PITA was to install all the right SGML and XML files and get
the catalogs right so that sgmltools and saxon work (I mainly use SGML
right now but want to switch to XML soon).
That is fair. In the previous message I told you how to produce xml.
My
ven if it says I got a book (Docbook SGML) class.
Does SGML/XML work fpr you with the current CVS version or is it just
Mac again?
Could you send an example, the original lyx file as well as the resulting
sgml...
Attached. I couldn't produce a new file since my LyX doesn't allow to change any docum
Hi!
This is my first patch to this list, so please tell me if it is not up
to standard!
It fixes a problem where Docbook XML output had unclosed xref ...
tags.
/Andreas
patch-insetref
Description: Binary data
It fixes a problem where Docbook XML output had unclosed xref ...
tags.
Add an entry to the ChangeLog, basically the date, your name and this
description, it should be enough. :-) Just follow the examples there.
/Andreas
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)
Hi,
here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
(Once I have figured out how to make multi-file patches without
including all my binaries I will send patches with a modified Changelog
file, sorry)
/Andreas
patch-insetref
Description: Binary data
Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi,
here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
(Once I have figured out how to make multi-file patches without
including all my binaries I will send patches with a modified Changelog
file, sorry)
Andreas, if you're modifying a cvs tree,
;-)
You need to add this to your preferences file:
\format "docbook-xml" "xml" "Docbook (xml)" "" "" ""
The important aspect here is that we decide that the format is xml based
because the string xml appears here in the 3rd field.
Hi José !
I checked out 1.4.0cvs and finally got it to compile on MacOSX.
I also found the Format dialog, no problem.
The main PITA was to install all the right SGML and XML files and get
the catalogs right so that sgmltools and saxon work (I mainly use SGML
right now but want to switch to XML
> I also found the Format dialog, no problem.
> The main PITA was to install all the right SGML and XML files and get
> the catalogs right so that sgmltools and saxon work (I mainly use SGML
> right now but want to switch to XML soon).
That is fair. In the previous message I told y
if it says I got a "book (Docbook SGML)" class.
Does SGML/XML work fpr you with the current CVS version or is it just
Mac again?
Could you send an example, the original lyx file as well as the resulting
sgml...
Attached. I couldn't produce a new file since my LyX doesn't allow to change an
Hi!
This is my first patch to this list, so please tell me if it is not up
to standard!
It fixes a problem where Docbook XML output had unclosed
tags.
/Andreas
patch-insetref
Description: Binary data
o read:
diff -u
> It fixes a problem where Docbook XML output had unclosed
> tags.
Add an entry to the ChangeLog, basically the date, your name and this
description, it should be enough. :-) Just follow the examples there.
> /Andreas
>
--
José Abílio Matos
LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)
Hi,
here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
(Once I have figured out how to make multi-file patches without
including all my binaries I will send patches with a modified Changelog
file, sorry)
/Andreas
patch-insetref
Description: Binary data
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here it is. The Changelog entry is at the beginning of the patch file.
>
> (Once I have figured out how to make multi-file patches without
> including all my binaries I will send patches with a modified Changelog
> file, sorry)
Andreas, if you're modifying a cvs
Hi!
I would like to offer help with the Docbook XML support. My C++ days
are 6 years gone so I missed all the new stuff with namespaces, STL and
exceptions, but I could code some small patches.
Who is currently working on these features? Is there a roadmap or a
list of assigned tasks?
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
Hi!
I would like to offer help with the Docbook XML support. My C++ days
are 6 years gone so I missed all the new stuff with namespaces, STL and
exceptions, but I could code some small patches.
No problem, as long as you show
Hi!
I would like to offer help with the Docbook XML support. My C++ days
are 6 years gone so I missed all the new stuff with namespaces, STL and
exceptions, but I could code some small patches.
Who is currently working on these features? Is there a roadmap or a
list of assigned tasks?
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to offer help with the Docbook XML support. My C++ days
> are 6 years gone so I missed all the new stuff with namespaces, STL and
> exceptions, but I could code some small patches.
No problem,
Any comment on this patch, need to add the support to output docbook xml?
If not I will commit it later today.
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Index: po/POTFILES.in
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose'Any comment on this patch, need to add the support to output
Jose' docbook xml? If not I will commit it later today.
I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex and
*ML flavors together.
JMarc
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 13:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex and
*ML flavors together.
No so strange, if you think latex could evolve to xml. :-)
Then you would have both flavours of latex.
The right thing to do would
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jose' On Wednesday 12 May 2004 13:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex
and *ML flavors together.
Jose' No so strange, if you think latex could evolve to xml. :-)
Jose' Then you
Any comment on this patch, need to add the support to output docbook xml?
If not I will commit it later today.
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Index: po/POTFILES.in
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
>>>>> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'>Any comment on this patch, need to add the support to output
Jose'> docbook xml? If not I will commit it later today.
I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex and
*ML flavors together.
JMarc
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 13:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex and
> *ML flavors together.
No so strange, if you think latex could evolve to xml. :-)
Then you would have both flavours of latex.
The right thing to
>>>>> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Wednesday 12 May 2004 13:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I guess it's OK, also it is a bit strange that we are mixing latex
>> and *ML flavors together.
Jose'> No so strange,
Title: CONTENT-TEK/
[LaTeX][OCR/Indexing][DjVu][XML/SGML/HTML][FrameMaker][QuarkXpress][InDesign][PDFPS]
LaTeXTypesetting
Multilingual
Desktop
Publishing
XML/SGML
Solutions
.
Get
Published ... Print ... On-line ... Media
Your Partner
þ
High
quality LaTeX
Amr Aboelmagd
Content-TeK Incorporation
http://www.content-tek.com
That's preposterous. Hopefully all readers of this list can abstain from doing
any business with those people.
Cheers, Kuba
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 12:48 pm, Kuba Ober wrote:
Amr Aboelmagd
Content-TeK Incorporation
http://www.content-tek.com
That's preposterous.
As in one would think people using LaTeX are up to higher standards. I needed
to elaborate :)
Cheers, Kuba
Title:
[LaTeX][OCR/Indexing][DjVu][XML/SGML/HTML][FrameMaker][QuarkXpress][InDesign][PDF]
LaTeXTypesetting
Multilingual
Desktop
Publishing
XML/SGML
Solutions
.
Get
Published ... Print ... On-line ... Media
Your Partner
þ
High
quality LaTeX typesetting
> Amr Aboelmagd
> Content-TeK Incorporation
> http://www.content-tek.com
That's preposterous. Hopefully all readers of this list can abstain from doing
any business with those people.
Cheers, Kuba
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 12:48 pm, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > Amr Aboelmagd
> > Content-TeK Incorporation
> > http://www.content-tek.com
>
> That's preposterous.
As in one would think people using LaTeX are up to higher standards. I needed
to elaborate :)
Cheers, Kuba
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
both a
On Thursday 27 November 2003 7:33 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
Shrug shrug. How
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:25:32AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
both a LaTeX file and a PDF, and nothing untoward seemed to happen.
Both files look OK.
So I'll just check this in then, right? Any other opinions?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> >
> > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
>
> Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
both
On Thursday 27 November 2003 7:33 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
> >
> > Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
>
> Shrug
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:25:32AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
> > both a LaTeX file and a PDF, and nothing untoward seemed to happen.
> > Both files look OK.
> >
> > So I'll just check this in then, right? Any other
Angus Leeming wrote:
Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
maturing into some real code.
Ahh well, given that Christmas is still some time off, I guess that
I'll have to wait for my presents.
I don't know if Santa is subscribed to this list, though ;-)
Alfredo
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:28:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
This will add
?xml version=1.0 encoding=latin-1?
in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
Does that mean adding
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 19:00, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:00:25PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
With all the cleaning your cleaning going on I am tempted to rename
docbook to SGML and the make docbook as an instance of that. :-)
The support for xml can
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 20:28, Angus Leeming wrote:
Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
usePdflatex() in Converters?
Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
maturing into some real code.
So we do. I am still waiting since last meeting.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
--
Angus
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
It will once we have more than two
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
--
Angus
Something like this?
-
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 5:54 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it
Something like this?
Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the latex
compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try running
png images through latex ;-)
Angus
Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
-
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 8:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Something like this?
Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the
latex compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try
running png images through latex ;-)
Angus
Eh? But
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
> maturing into some real code.
>
> Ahh well, given that Christmas is still some time off, I guess that
> I'll have to wait for my presents.
I don't know if Santa is subscribed to this list, though ;-)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:28:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
> >> This will add
> >>
> >> in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
> >
gt;
> > The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
> > This will add
> >
> > in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
>
> Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to usePdflatex()
> in Converters?
That is my plan. It makes
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 20:28, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
> > usePdflatex() in Converters?
>
> Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
> maturing into some real code.
So we do. I am still waiting since last
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
> A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
--
Angus
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Meaning what?
>
> Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
>
> > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
>
> Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
It will once we have more than
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Meaning what?
>
> Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
>
> > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
>
> Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
>
> --
> Angus
Something
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 5:54 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Meaning what?
> >
> > Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
> >
> > > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
> >
> > Nice idea
> > Something like this?
>
> Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the latex
> compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try running
> png images through latex ;-)
>
> Angus
Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 8:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Something like this?
> >
> > Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the
> > latex compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try
> > running png images through latex ;-)
> >
> > Angus
| [x] after a thourough read-thru
--
Lgb
Lars,
any news on this one?
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
position clear: I am very happy that you are
doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
just shifts the support. My aim is to have .lyx files that work
equally well with latex or xml, and that the two formats
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
just shifts
clear: I am very happy that you are
doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
just shifts the support.
I don't believe so... but I may be wrong. Therefore it would be good
if you could point out concrete
that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
just shifts the support. My aim is to have .lyx files that work
equally well with latex or xml, and that the two formats (or more) are
equally well supported by the .lyx format _with the same mechanisms_.
I do not want part of the .lyx
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:00:25PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
With all the cleaning your cleaning going on I am tempted to rename docbook
to SGML and the make docbook as an instance of that. :-)
The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
This will add
?xml
Martin Vermeer wrote:
The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
This will add
?xml version=1.0 encoding=latin-1?
in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
usePdflatex() in Converters?
Yuck! Nothing
> | [x] after a thourough read-thru
>
> --
> Lgb
Lars,
any news on this one?
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d probably just apply
it.
But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
just shifts the support. My aim is to have .lyx files that
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
> doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
> am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
>
gt;
> But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
> doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
> am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
> just shifts the support.
I don't believe so... but I may be wrong. Theref
owever I
> > am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
> > just shifts the support. My aim is to have .lyx files that work
> > equally well with latex or xml, and that the two formats (or more) are
> > equally well supported by the .lyx format _with the s
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:00:25PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> With all the cleaning your cleaning going on I am tempted to rename docbook
> to SGML and the make docbook as an instance of that. :-)
>
> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
>> This will add
>>
>> in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
>
> Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
> usePdflatex() in Converters?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
| [x] after a thourough read-thru
Lars,
sorry to provide you with a moving target, but here is the further
improved version of the 'XML tags' patch.
Here you only have to look at the counters stuff, which is what has
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> | [x] after a thourough read-thru
Lars,
sorry to provide you with a moving target, but here is the further
improved version of the 'XML tags' patch.
Here you only have to look at the counters stuff, which is w
Here's the evolved version. I added the feature of ID labels (counter
based) including paragraph ID labels, which are REQUIRED for AGU.
(Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
...and general polish and improved
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
| there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
All... and that is controlled by the numbering depth
| Lars, can this go in
| [ ] as such
| [ ] with or
| [ ] without AGU
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
| there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
All... and that is controlled by the
Here's the evolved version. I added the feature of ID labels (counter
based) including paragraph ID labels, which are REQUIRED for AGU.
(Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
...and general polish and improved
601 - 700 of 1040 matches
Mail list logo
