Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for now? Yes. I'll do that for branch (after 1.6.3), but I have a good solution for

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: > >> What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to >> remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for >> now? > > Yes. I'll do that for branch (after 1.6.3), but I have a good

Re: changeset/29734

Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty is in a place where LaTeX does not search, the Sweave R function actually outputs \usepackage{/path/to/Sweave.sty} which is kind of ugly but does the trick. This is transparent for us, since we do not add the \usepackage

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de writes: This hack is indeed a bit unusual but will work, and this way the license of the used files is at least clear. But how do you check for R? Currently we search for Sweave.sty via chkconfig.ltx which is not sensible in my opinion. What I can do right now,

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for now? Yes. regards Uwe

Re: changeset/29734

> Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty is in a place where LaTeX > does not search, the Sweave R function actually outputs > \usepackage{/path/to/Sweave.sty} > which is kind of ugly but does the trick. This is transparent for us, since we do not add the >

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr writes: > This hack is indeed a bit unusual but will work, and this way the > license of the used files is at least clear. But how do you check for > R? Currently we search for Sweave.sty via chkconfig.ltx which is not > sensible in my opinion. What I can do right

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for now? Yes. regards Uwe

changeset/29734

JMarc, Jürgen, can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? regards Uwe

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a trustable official webpage. http://svn.r

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr wrote: can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No objections from me. Jürgen

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty is available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail. OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. regards Uwe

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 18:28, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Uwe Stöhr schrieb: can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a trustable official webpage. Sweave.sty is part of R, which is probably considered as more trustable than LyX itself by many. The

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 19:08, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : The problem is that we look only for the file Sweave.sty. but LaTeX won't find it, because it is not available at CTAN. So even when you have R installed. it won't be found. Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty is

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 18:48, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Uwe Stöhr schrieb: JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty is available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail. OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. I would have preferred you to wait for that, if

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. I would have preferred you to wait for that, if only to hear my thoughts on the subject. While you are free to disagree with me, you could have least have assumed that I know what I am doing... I

Re: changeset/29734

I know that you are knowing what you do. I was perhaps a bit over- eager because I send this mail before I received your first mail. But I think it doesn't harm that I contacted him. He can reject my proposal or give a statement, or add the license and author info to sweave.sty. I'm curious

changeset/29734

JMarc, Jürgen, can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? regards Uwe

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a trustable official webpage. http://svn.r

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 > and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No objections from me. Jürgen

Re: changeset/29734

Uwe Stöhr schrieb: JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty is available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail. OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. regards Uwe

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 18:28, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Uwe Stöhr schrieb: can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734 and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4? No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a trustable official webpage. Sweave.sty is part of R, which is probably considered as more trustable than LyX itself by many. The

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 19:08, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : The problem is that we look only for the file Sweave.sty. but LaTeX won't find it, because it is not available at CTAN. So even when you have R installed. it won't be found. Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty is

Re: changeset/29734

Le 19 mai 09 à 18:48, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Uwe Stöhr schrieb: JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty is available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail. OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. I would have preferred you to wait for that, if

Re: changeset/29734

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave. I would have preferred you to wait for that, if only to hear my thoughts on the subject. While you are free to disagree with me, you could have least have assumed that I know what I am doing... I

Re: changeset/29734

I know that you are knowing what you do. I was perhaps a bit over- eager because I send this mail before I received your first mail. But I think it doesn't harm that I contacted him. He can reject my proposal or give a statement, or add the license and author info to sweave.sty. I'm curious