Why do we have 1995 Mathias Ettrich in frontends/qt2 ?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:20:45AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Why do we have 1995 Mathias Ettrich in frontends/qt2 ?
Er, it's a homage ?
john
--
All photography is accurate - none of it is truth.
- Richard Avedon
Why do we have "1995 Mathias Ettrich" in frontends/qt2 ?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:20:45AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Why do we have "1995 Mathias Ettrich" in frontends/qt2 ?
Er, it's a homage ?
john
--
"All photography is accurate - none of it is truth."
- Richard Avedon
Tedious but done. Ok to apply?
Angus
support.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
can be found in the file COPYING.
*
- * LyX, The Document Processor
+ * \author unknown
*
mine
+/**
+ * \file filetools.C
+ * This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
+ * Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
+ *
+ * parts Copyright 1985, 1990, 1993 Free Software
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 10:45 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Tedious but done. Ok to apply?
[snip fixes]
If you fix up these it is ok to commit. :-)
Ok dokey.
Angus
Tedious but done. Ok to apply?
Angus
support.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
icence details can be found in the file COPYING.
*
- * LyX, The Document Processor
+ * \author unknown
*
mine
+/**
+ * \file filetools.C
+ * This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
+ * Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
+ *
+ * parts Copyright 1985, 1990, 199
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 10:45 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Tedious but done. Ok to apply?
[snip fixes]
> If you fix up these it is ok to commit. :-)
Ok dokey.
Angus
Have we reached consensus on the copyright stuff?
Would it be ok to run the latest script posted to the list on src/mathed
and add myself as \author in all cases where there isn't one and Alejandro
in those .C where he is mentioned as author in the .h?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Have we reached consensus on the copyright stuff?
| Would it be ok to run the latest script posted to the list on src/mathed
| and add myself as \author in all cases where there isn't one and Alejandro
| in those .C where he is mentioned as author
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd say yes.
Ok. Looks like I have to edit the stuff manually anyway *sigh*.
What's the prefered order for:
[1] This emacs stuff?
// -*- C++ -*-
[2] the include guard
#ifndef MATH_ATOM_H
#define
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| I'd say yes.
|
| Ok. Looks like I have to edit the stuff manually anyway *sigh*.
|
| What's the prefered order for:
|
|
| [1] This emacs stuff?
|
| // -*- C++ -*-
Only in
Have we reached consensus on the copyright stuff?
Would it be ok to run the latest script posted to the list on src/mathed
and add myself as \author in all cases where there isn't one and Alejandro
in those .C where he is mentioned as author in the .h?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Have we reached consensus on the copyright stuff?
>
| Would it be ok to run the latest script posted to the list on src/mathed
| and add myself as \author in all cases where there isn't one and Alejandro
| in those .C where he is mentioned
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd say yes.
Ok. Looks like I have to edit the stuff manually anyway *sigh*.
What's the prefered order for:
[1] This emacs stuff?
// -*- C++ -*-
[2] the include guard
#ifndef MATH_ATOM_H
#define
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I'd say yes.
|
| Ok. Looks like I have to edit the stuff manually anyway *sigh*.
|
| What's the prefered order for:
|
|
| [1] This emacs stuff?
|
| // -*- C++ -*-
Only
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 4 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [...]
| | Fair point. So your preferred heading is
| |
| | /*
| | * \file PreviewLoader.C
| | * Read the file COPYING
| | *
| | * \author Angus Leeming
On 5 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Centralising the email addresses etc. in CREDITS means we don't have
| patches that touch heaps of files like Angus committed recently when
| he changed his email address. Instead his script could just add
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Copyright The LyX Team.
As there is no real entity with this name.
I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
substantial¹ work on a file, also add themselves to the copyright
clause
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 5 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [...]
| | Centralising the email addresses etc. in CREDITS means we don't have
| | patches that touch heaps of files like Angus committed recently when
| | he changed
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
but it is a lot easier to remember to add self to the top of the very
same file you are editing, instead of CREDITS or MAINTAIERS...
But if you have to change it, it is easier to do in a single place, and its
showing lower
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Copyright The LyX Team.
|
| As there is no real entity with this name.
|
| I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
| substantial¹ work on a file
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| but it is a lot easier to remember to add self to the top of the very
| same file you are editing, instead of CREDITS or MAINTAIERS...
|
| But if you have to change it, it is
On Thursday 05 September 2002 08:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
You know, this style:
/*
* \file GraphicsCache.C
* Copyright 2002 the LyX Team
* Read the file COPYING
*
* \author Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* \author Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
or a modification
On Thursday 05 September 2002 8:08 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Just so I'm perfectly clear:
|
| /*
| * \file PreviewLoader.C
| * Read the file COPYING
| *
| * \author Angus Leeming
| *
| * Full author contact details available in file CREDITS
| */
The script below will
: Public domain is not
legal in norway since you cannot give up your copyright)
--
Lgb
usual options are begin and
end. Also you should note that this is standard.
Oh, we can just take owership of public domain and release them as
GPL. (or isn't that allowed? on another note: Public domain is not
legal in norway since you cannot give up your copyright)
Since that is your code I
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Since that is your code I think that you can, that change doesn't apply to
| older versions.
I cannot give up rights.
--
Lgb
Ok, I've done all files in the src/graphics, src/frontends/controllers and
src/frontends/xforms dirs. That includes moving all old style headers to the
new style. (I think.)
I added an author unknown entry to any file that did not have an author
listed.
I reckon that I've done my bit on this
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Ok, I've done all files in the src/graphics, src/frontends/controllers and
| src/frontends/xforms dirs. That includes moving all old style headers to the
| new style. (I think.)
Ok, thanks.
| I added an author unknown entry to any file that did not
On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
--
José Abílio
with the explicit note?
Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
replicate blurb?
Angus
José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| Hmm da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
| but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
|
| Should we replace the COPYING reference with the
to it...
|
|Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
|
| Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
| like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
|
| My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
to look at first,
| but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
|
|Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
|
| Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
| like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too
the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
| |
| | My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
| | replicate blurb?
|
| So that a file taken out of context (i.e. lyx) still has the license
| information.
|
| Then add a line from the old style
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:38 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On occasion it might be nice to do as other gpl projects too...
You mean like using politically correct GUI toolkits ?
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:22:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
So that a file taken out of context (i.e. lyx) still has the license
information.
Please tell me you don't want 30 lines of license information in every
file like Mozilla or something.
The rreference to COPYING is fine.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
It is GPL-ed code.
Not true. Like I said, you'll need lines and lines.
See the file COPYING
This is more than enough (i.e. what we have already)
/**
* \file
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:38 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| On occasion it might be nice to do as other gpl projects too...
|
| You mean like using politically correct GUI toolkits ?
And we are now, aren't we?
(if we only could get the gtk
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin and
end. Also you should note that this is standard.
That's how I navigate. If this yuck gets done I suppose I shall have to
teach vim how to
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:50 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin
and end. Also you should note that this is standard.
That's how I navigate. If this
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| btw, the blurb you show is wrong - we grant additional rights.
Not that again...
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:50 pm, John Levon wrote:
| On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin
| and end. Also you should note that
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:58 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| // This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
| // Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
|
| I think that that cuts it don't you? At least it describes /why/ anyone
| would want to read COPYING.
Yes,
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:21:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| Full author contact details available in file CREDITS
|
| whineDo we really need that line everywhere ? People aren't morons
| .../whine
Stop those piggish sounds.
Yes we do.
--
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Yes we do.
*SQUEEEAK*
Ah well.
john
--
Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels.
- Jonathan S. Shapiro
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 4 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [...]
| > | Fair point. So your preferred heading is
| > |
| > | /*
| > | * \file PreviewLoader.C
| > | * Read the file COPYING
| > | *
| > | * \author Angus
On 5 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Centralising the email addresses etc. in CREDITS means we don't have
> | patches that touch heaps of files like Angus committed recently when
> | he changed his email address. Instead his script could
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Copyright The LyX Team."
>
> As there is no real entity with this name.
>
> I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
> substantial¹ work on a file, also add themselv
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 5 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [...]
| > | Centralising the email addresses etc. in CREDITS means we don't have
| > | patches that touch heaps of files like Angus committed recently when
| > | he
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> but it is a lot easier to remember to add self to the top of the very
> same file you are editing, instead of CREDITS or MAINTAIERS...
But if you have to change it, it is easier to do in a single place, and its
showing "lower
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Copyright The LyX Team."
| >
| > As there is no real entity with this name.
| >
| > I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:35:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > but it is a lot easier to remember to add self to the top of the very
| > same file you are editing, instead of CREDITS or MAINTAIERS...
|
| But if you have to change it, it is
On Thursday 05 September 2002 08:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You know, this style:
>
> /*
> * \file GraphicsCache.C
> * Copyright 2002 the LyX Team
> * Read the file COPYING
> *
> * \author Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * \autho
On Thursday 05 September 2002 8:08 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Just so I'm perfectly clear:
> |
> | /*
> | * \file PreviewLoader.C
> | * Read the file COPYING
> | *
> | * \author Angus Leeming
> | *
> | * Full author contact details available in file CREDITS
> | */
The script
on another note: Public domain is not
legal in norway since you cannot give up your copyright)
--
Lgb
e anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin and
end. Also you should note that this is standard.
> Oh, we can just take owership of public domain and release them as
> GPL. (or isn't that allowed? on another note: Public domain is not
> legal in norway since you cannot give up your c
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Since that is your code I think that you can, that change doesn't apply to
| older versions.
I cannot give up rights.
--
Lgb
Ok, I've "done" all files in the src/graphics, src/frontends/controllers and
src/frontends/xforms dirs. That includes moving all old style headers to the
new style. (I think.)
I added an "author unknown" entry to any file that did not have an author
listed.
I reckon that I've "done my bit"
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ok, I've "done" all files in the src/graphics, src/frontends/controllers and
| src/frontends/xforms dirs. That includes moving all old style headers to the
| new style. (I think.)
Ok, thanks.
| I added an "author unknown" entry to any file that
On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Hmm da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
> but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
--
José Abílio
e replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
replicate blurb?
Angus
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:00, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > Hmm da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
| > but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
|
| Should we replace the COPYING reference with the
ease somebody beat me to it...
| >
| > Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
|
| Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
| like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
|
| My philosophy is, w
da hmm I have some counters stuff to look at first,
> | > > but after that... please somebody beat me to it...
> | >
> | > Should we replace the COPYING reference with the explicit note?
> |
> | Well it's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
's dead easy to do: just modify the script. But personally I quite
| > | like the fact that all this copyright notice stuff is in one place too.
| > |
| > | My philosophy is, we try not to replicate code unnecessarily, so why
| > | replicate blurb?
| >
| > So that a file taken
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:38 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> On occasion it might be nice to do as other gpl projects too...
You mean like using politically correct GUI toolkits ?
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:22:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So that a file taken out of context (i.e. lyx) still has the license
> information.
Please tell me you don't want 30 lines of license information in every
file like Mozilla or something.
The rreference to COPYING is fine.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
> It is GPL-ed code.
Not true. Like I said, you'll need lines and lines.
> See the file COPYING
This is more than enough (i.e. what we have already)
/**
*
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:38 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > On occasion it might be nice to do as other gpl projects too...
|
| You mean like using politically correct GUI toolkits ?
And we are now, aren't we?
(if we only could get the
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin and
> end. Also you should note that this is standard.
That's how I navigate. If this yuck gets done I suppose I shall have to
teach vim how
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:50 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin
> > and end. Also you should note that this is standard.
>
> That's how I navigate.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| btw, the blurb you show is wrong - we grant additional rights.
Not that again...
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:50 pm, John Levon wrote:
| > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:24:53PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| > > This note can be anywhere in the file, the most usual options are begin
| > > and end. Also you should note
On Thursday 05 September 2002 3:58 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | // This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
> | // Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
> |
> | I think that that cuts it don't you? At least it describes /why/ anyone
> | would want to read COPYING.
>
>
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:21:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > "Full author contact details available in file CREDITS"
|
| Do we really need that line everywhere ? People aren't morons
| ...
Stop those piggish sounds.
Yes we do.
--
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes we do.
*SQUEEEAK*
Ah well.
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels."
- Jonathan S. Shapiro
I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
Copyright The LyX Team.
As there is no real entity with this name.
I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
substantial¹ work on a file, also add themselves to the copyright
clause in the same file
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
Copyright The LyX Team.
As there is no real entity with this name.
I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
substantial¹ work
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
|
| Copyright The LyX Team.
|
| As there is no real entity with this name.
|
| I would suggest that from now
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:41 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| All that is important is that the
| authorship is apparent. So our lines
| \author Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| \author Angus Leeming
| are sufficient statements of copyright.
Yes, but that information is missing now, so
statements of copyright.
Yes, but that information is missing now, so WE do not really know.
Not really. We have cvs. Could you not write a script to interrogate all
submissions to a file? If more than 10 lines, then you're an author.
For the sake of copyright per se, you do not even have to add
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:49 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
Would you like me to run this little shell script over LyX's .[Ch] files?
#! /bin/sh
for FILE in $*
do
DIR=`dirname ${FILE}`
BASE=`basename $1`
TMP=${DIR}/${BASE}.tmp
sed -e '/the LyX Team/d' \
of copyright.
|
| Yes, but that information is missing now, so WE do not really know.
|
| Not really. We have cvs. Could you not write a script to interrogate all
| submissions to a file? If more than 10 lines, then you're an author.
You really belive that we have CVS logs back to day one :-)
and 10
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:49 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| Would you like me to run this little shell script over LyX's .[Ch] files?
|
| #! /bin/sh
|
| for FILE in $*
| do
| DIR=`dirname ${FILE}`
| BASE=`basename $1`
|
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:05:23PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
Copyright The LyX Team.
As there is no real entity with this name.
I believe we haven't
On 4 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Fair point. So your preferred heading is
|
| /*
| * \file PreviewLoader.C
| * Read the file COPYING
| *
| * \author Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| */
|
| I believe that we decided it'd
I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
"Copyright The LyX Team."
As there is no real entity with this name.
I would suggest that from now on, that everybody that does some
substantial¹ work on a file, also add themselves to the copyright
clause in the
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
>
> "Copyright The LyX Team."
>
> As there is no real entity with this name.
>
> I would suggest that from now on, that everybo
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
| >
| > "Copyright The LyX Team."
| >
| > As there is no real entity with thi
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:41 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | All that is important is that the
> | authorship is apparent. So our lines
> | \author Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> | \author Angus Leeming
> | are sufficient statements of copyright.
>
> Yes, but that i
; | \author Angus Leeming
> > | are sufficient statements of copyright.
> >
> > Yes, but that information is missing now, so WE do not really know.
>
> Not really. We have cvs. Could you not write a script to interrogate all
> submissions to a file? If more than 10 lines, then you're an
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:49 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Would you like me to run this little shell script over LyX's .[Ch] files?
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> for FILE in $*
> do
> DIR=`dirname ${FILE}`
> BASE=`basename $1`
> TMP=${DIR}/${BASE}.tmp
> sed -e '/the LyX Team/d'
sufficient statements of copyright.
| >
| > Yes, but that information is missing now, so WE do not really know.
|
| Not really. We have cvs. Could you not write a script to interrogate all
| submissions to a file? If more than 10 lines, then you're an author.
You really belive that we ha
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:49 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > Would you like me to run this little shell script over LyX's .[Ch] files?
| >
| > #! /bin/sh
| >
| > for FILE in $*
| > do
| > DIR=`dirname ${FILE}`
| > BASE=`basename $1`
| >
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:05:23PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 September 2002 6:29 pm, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > I belive that we have done ourselves a bad favour by use the
> > "Copyright The LyX Team."
> > As there is no real entity
On 4 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Fair point. So your preferred heading is
> |
> | /*
> | * \file PreviewLoader.C
> | * Read the file COPYING
> | *
> | * \author Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | */
> |
> | I believe that
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
