Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-27 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 06:44:29PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:13:16AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: 2002-08-22Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] * text2.C: fixed enumeration

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-27 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 06:44:29PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:13:16AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > 2002-08-22Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * text2.C: fixed

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-22 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:13:16AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: 2002-08-22Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] * text2.C: fixed enumeration mis-count as reported by Dr. Richard Hawkins. oh, dear. If this kind of entry is made, My name will be in there more than half the

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-22 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:13:16AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > 2002-08-22Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * text2.C: fixed enumeration mis-count as reported by > Dr. Richard Hawkins. oh, dear. If this kind of entry is made, My name will be in there more than half the

enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the attached document, the enumeration under Course Methods and Learning displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous enumeration. The postscript output is correct. -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the attached document, the enumeration under Course Methods and Learning displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous enumeration. The

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the attached document, the enumeration under Course Methods and Learning displays the first element

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:14:43PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the attached document,

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:14:43PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: | | On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: | On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: |As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:08:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Ok, now I only need a ChangeLog entry. btw... | - for (int i = par-enumdepth + 1; i 4; i++) { | + for (int i = par-enumdepth; i 4; i++) { ++i is prefered. -- Lgb 2002-08-22

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:27:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: - for (int i = par-enumdepth + 1; i 4; i++) { + for (int i = par-enumdepth; i 4; i++) { As a matter of style: prefer pre-increment over post-increment. It does not really matter here (except for

enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning" displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous enumeration. The postscript output is correct. -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the > attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning" > displays the first element as 5, continuing the count from the previous > enumeration.

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the > > attached document, the enumeration under "Course Methods and Learning" > > displays the

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:14:43PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > > As I rewrite my syllabus, I find a display error in lyx. In the > > > attached

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:14:43PM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: | | > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: | > > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 6:01 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: | > > > As I rewrite my syllabus, I

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:08:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Ok, now I only need a ChangeLog entry. > > btw... > > | - for (int i = par->enumdepth + 1; i < 4; i++) { > | + for (int i = par->enumdepth; i < 4; i++) { > > ++i is prefered. > > -- > Lgb

Re: enumeration miscount

2002-08-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:27:50PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > - for (int i = par->enumdepth + 1; i < 4; i++) { > + for (int i = par->enumdepth; i < 4; i++) { As a matter of style: prefer pre-increment over post-increment. It does not really matter here (except for

Re: enumeration miscount in lyx

2001-10-23 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:43:23PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote: the fifth question on this document appears as 5. in lyx, but back to 1 . in latex Here is a fixed file. The problem is that CVS lyx allows infinite nesting: Start an enumerate paragraph, create two items, and press M-p

Re: enumeration miscount in lyx

2001-10-23 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:43:23PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > the fifth question on this document appears as 5. in lyx, but back to 1 > . in latex Here is a fixed file. The problem is that CVS lyx allows "infinite nesting": Start an enumerate paragraph, create two items, and press