Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: Could not find platform independent libraries prefix Could not find platform dependent libraries exec_prefix Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to prefix[:exec_prefix] 'import site'

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread R. Lahaye
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: Could not find platform independent libraries prefix Could not find platform dependent libraries exec_prefix Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
R. Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: | On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | | Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: | | Could not find platform independent libraries prefix | Could not find platform dependent libraries

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:52, Rob Lahaye wrote: I thought that `env python` should work like this: #! /usr/bin/env python YES, it does! Please apply to python scripts in CVS. Oh, you mean lib/scripts/*.py Since this discussion begun with lyx2lyx I was really puzzled because

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: SuSE 7.3 (python 2.1). I discovered that there was a second (incomplete?) python version installed (hell knows why). After deleting that, lyx2lyx imports my 1.2.x files. Good. A remaining issue on opening a new file is:

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: A remaining issue on opening a new file is: Cannot open ~/.lyx/templates/defaults.lyx Do you have this file? Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs. What is its file format version? \lyxformat 220 Are using the lastest cvs? I remember

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs. What is its file format version? \lyxformat 220 Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem. I suspect that we forgot the open template option. Thanks,

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem. Yes, that solves it. Thanks, Jürgen.

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs. What is its file format version? \lyxformat 220 Could you open and save it, and see if

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dekel On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Dekel Matos wrote: On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs. What is its file format version?

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: This shows that python wasn't properly installed. Yes, I suspected this too. juergen@eddy:~ python -V Python 2.0 Just for backward compatibility I am using python 1.5.2 Actually, it should be python 2.1. See below. juergen@eddy:~ getopt --version

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: > > Could not find platform independent libraries > Could not find platform dependent libraries > Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:] > 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread R. Lahaye
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >>Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: >> >>Could not find platform independent libraries >>Could not find platform dependent libraries >>Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:]

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: | > On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | > | >>Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get: | >> | >>Could not find platform independent libraries | >>Could not find platform dependent

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:52, Rob Lahaye wrote: > > > > I thought that `env python` should work like this: > > > > #! /usr/bin/env python > > YES, it does! Please apply to python scripts in CVS. Oh, you mean lib/scripts/*.py Since this discussion begun with lyx2lyx I was really

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > SuSE 7.3 (python 2.1). I discovered that there was a second (incomplete?) > python version installed (hell knows why). After deleting that, lyx2lyx > imports my 1.2.x files. Good. > A remaining issue on opening a new file is:

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > A remaining issue on opening a new file is: > > > > "Cannot open ~/.lyx/templates/defaults.lyx" > > Do you have this file? Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs. > What is its file format version? \lyxformat 220 > Are using the lastest

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs. > > > What is its file format version? > > \lyxformat 220 Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem. I suspect that we forgot the open template option.

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem. Yes, that solves it. Thanks, Jürgen.

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > > > Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs. > > > > > What is its file format version? > > > > \lyxformat 220 > > Could you open and save

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Dekel> Matos wrote: >> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> > >> > Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs. >> > >> > > What is its

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-10 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote: > This shows that python wasn't properly installed. Yes, I suspected this too. > > juergen@eddy:~> python -V > > Python 2.0 > > Just for backward compatibility I am using python 1.5.2 Actually, it should be python 2.1. See below. > > juergen@eddy:~>

is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this morning. hawk -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ /

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this morning. AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run lyx in-place was made,

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:59:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: But when installing LyX, the lyx2lyx files are not installed to LYXDIR. Can you make the necessary modification to your patch ? No. I haven't got it any more john -- This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually every conversation

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this morning. AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run

is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this morning. hawk -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ /

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a > week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this > morning. AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run lyx in-place was

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:59:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > But when installing LyX, the lyx2lyx files are not installed to LYXDIR. > Can you make the necessary modification to your patch ? No. I haven't got it any more john -- "This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually every

Re: is lyx2lyx still not in path?

2002-09-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a > > week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this > > morning. > > AFAIK only the change that allowed you