On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
Could not find platform independent libraries prefix
Could not find platform dependent libraries exec_prefix
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to prefix[:exec_prefix]
'import site'
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
Could not find platform independent libraries prefix
Could not find platform dependent libraries exec_prefix
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to
R. Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
|
| Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
|
| Could not find platform independent libraries prefix
| Could not find platform dependent libraries
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:52, Rob Lahaye wrote:
I thought that `env python` should work like this:
#! /usr/bin/env python
YES, it does! Please apply to python scripts in CVS.
Oh, you mean lib/scripts/*.py
Since this discussion begun with lyx2lyx I was really puzzled because
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
SuSE 7.3 (python 2.1). I discovered that there was a second (incomplete?)
python version installed (hell knows why). After deleting that, lyx2lyx
imports my 1.2.x files.
Good.
A remaining issue on opening a new file is:
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
A remaining issue on opening a new file is:
Cannot open ~/.lyx/templates/defaults.lyx
Do you have this file?
Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs.
What is its file format version?
\lyxformat 220
Are using the lastest cvs? I remember
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs.
What is its file format version?
\lyxformat 220
Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem.
I suspect that we forgot the open template option.
Thanks,
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem.
Yes, that solves it.
Thanks,
Jürgen.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs.
What is its file format version?
\lyxformat 220
Could you open and save it, and see if
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira
Dekel Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Yes. And I can open it manually with 1.3.0cvs.
What is its file format version?
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
This shows that python wasn't properly installed.
Yes, I suspected this too.
juergen@eddy:~ python -V
Python 2.0
Just for backward compatibility I am using python 1.5.2
Actually, it should be python 2.1. See below.
juergen@eddy:~ getopt --version
On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
>
> Could not find platform independent libraries
> Could not find platform dependent libraries
> Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:]
> 'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
>>Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
>>
>>Could not find platform independent libraries
>>Could not find platform dependent libraries
>>Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:]
"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| > On Monday 09 September 2002 18:59, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
| >
| >>Doesn't work for me neither. This is what I get:
| >>
| >>Could not find platform independent libraries
| >>Could not find platform dependent
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:52, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >
> > I thought that `env python` should work like this:
> >
> > #! /usr/bin/env python
>
> YES, it does! Please apply to python scripts in CVS.
Oh, you mean lib/scripts/*.py
Since this discussion begun with lyx2lyx I was really
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> SuSE 7.3 (python 2.1). I discovered that there was a second (incomplete?)
> python version installed (hell knows why). After deleting that, lyx2lyx
> imports my 1.2.x files.
Good.
> A remaining issue on opening a new file is:
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > A remaining issue on opening a new file is:
> >
> > "Cannot open ~/.lyx/templates/defaults.lyx"
>
> Do you have this file?
Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs.
> What is its file format version?
\lyxformat 220
> Are using the lastest
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs.
>
> > What is its file format version?
>
> \lyxformat 220
Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem.
I suspect that we forgot the open template option.
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> Could you open and save it, and see if that solves the problem.
Yes, that solves it.
Thanks,
Jürgen.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> > Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs.
> >
> > > What is its file format version?
> >
> > \lyxformat 220
>
> Could you open and save
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:11:42PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira
Dekel> Matos wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes. And I can open it "manually" with 1.3.0cvs.
>> >
>> > > What is its
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> This shows that python wasn't properly installed.
Yes, I suspected this too.
> > juergen@eddy:~> python -V
> > Python 2.0
>
> Just for backward compatibility I am using python 1.5.2
Actually, it should be python 2.1. See below.
> > juergen@eddy:~>
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
morning.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ /
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
morning.
AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run lyx in-place was made,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:59:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
But when installing LyX, the lyx2lyx files are not installed to LYXDIR.
Can you make the necessary modification to your patch ?
No. I haven't got it any more
john
--
This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually every conversation
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
morning.
AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run
I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
morning.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ /
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
> week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
> morning.
AFAIK only the change that allowed you to run lyx in-place was
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:59:45PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But when installing LyX, the lyx2lyx files are not installed to LYXDIR.
> Can you make the necessary modification to your patch ?
No. I haven't got it any more
john
--
"This *is* Usenet, after all, where virtually every
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I thought the commit that made lyx2lyx available had been commmiteed a
> > week or two ago. It still doesn't show up for me with an update this
> > morning.
>
> AFAIK only the change that allowed you
30 matches
Mail list logo