On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I think I've been through this before . . .
In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
sections, but it does for the subsections. My text, in book class, uses
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" wrote:
> > I think I've been through this before . . .
> > In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
> > sections, but it does for the subsections. My text, in book class,
I think I've been through this before . . .
In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
sections, but it does for the subsections. My text, in book class, uses
them for all levels.
I don't see any ert setting this in either, or any preamble magic, and I
can't find
I think I've been through this before . . .
In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
sections, but it does for the subsections. My text, in book class, uses
them for all levels.
I don't see any ert setting this in either, or any preamble magic, and I
can't find
