Re: LyX home page oddity

On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two

Re: LyX home page oddity

On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output >>> > yet? >>> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these >>> two possibilities, like

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2009-04-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output > >>> > yet? > > >>> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix

Re: LyX home page oddity

On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde wrote: But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. I don't think so. But frankly: I don't care. Jürgen

Re: LyX home page oddity

On 2009-04-16, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output >> > yet? >> To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these >> two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde wrote: > But this hype does compromise the creditability of LyX. I don't think we > should use such marketing speak without a grain of salt. I don't think so. But frankly: I don't care. Jürgen

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde mi...@users.berlios.de writes: On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or

Re: LyX home page oddity

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output yet? To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these two possibilities, like looks like nothing else (to somebody who has never seen LaTeX output yet) but with a better

Re: LyX home page oddity

Guenter Milde writes: > On www.lyx.org, I read: > > On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or > richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like > nothing else. > > However, my experience is: > > ... its printed

Re: LyX home page oddity

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Do we really assume the average LyX user did not see any LaTeX output > > yet? > > To some extent, yes. I think a good phrasing would be a mix these > two possibilities, like "looks like nothing else (to somebody who has > never seen LaTeX output yet)" but with a

LyX home page oddity

On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily

LyX home page oddity

On www.lyx.org, I read: On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced - looks like nothing else. However, my experience is: ... its printed output - or richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily

Chinese LyX, LyX home page stuff

nks to LyX pages in N languages, especially including those languages for which patches are needed? In fact, now that I think of it, the first two sections of the devel.lyx.org translation page don't belong there. Stuff describing all the languages we can type in LyX belongs on the LyX home page. On the

Chinese LyX, LyX home page stuff

nks to LyX pages in N languages, especially including those languages for which patches are needed? In fact, now that I think of it, the first two sections of the devel.lyx.org translation page don't belong there. Stuff describing all the languages we can type in LyX belongs on the LyX home page. On the

lyx home page

While we're at it, why isn't Peter Sütterlin's main LyX page (http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit/LyX/) linked in the lyx links (in addition to his translation page, which is linked from the devel.lyx translations page). -Amir ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely

Re: lyx home page

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote: ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... too bad its group is asierra! Uhh, yes, I put it on line for you, remember? Fortunately I don't have to do

lyx home page

While we're at it, why isn't Peter Sütterlin's main LyX page (http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit/LyX/) linked in the lyx links (in addition to his translation page, which is linked from the devel.lyx translations page). -Amir ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely

Re: lyx home page

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > ps yes, all I ever do is make requests. Well, now that I'm so hugely > powerful, I'm willing to make changes to translations.php3 when necessary... > too bad its group is asierra! Uhh, yes, I put it on line for you, remember? Fortunately I don't have to