.
After copying you just need to check the Path Preferences (Tools →
Preferences... → Paths).
This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
installer to do this for you.
Kind regards,
Hugo
ork fine
> when being copied from an existing installation.
> After copying you just need to check the Path Preferences (Tools →
> Preferences... → Paths).
> This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
> installer to do this for you.
>
> Kind regards,
> Hugo
>
>
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Waluyo Adi Siswanto was.u...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a problem when installing LyX 2.06. (Windows 7)
It always stops when compiling python script. (see attachment)
I have tried to uninstall all including miktex, the install using the bundle
installer, it also
just need to check the Path Preferences (Tools →
Preferences... → Paths).
This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
installer to do this for you.
Kind regards,
Hugo
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> I have a problem when installing LyX 2.06. (Windows 7)
> It always stops when compiling python script. (see attachment)
> I have tried to uninstall all including miktex, the install using the bundle
> installer, it
ng you just need to check the Path Preferences (Tools →
Preferences... → Paths).
This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
installer to do this for you.
Kind regards,
Hugo
Christian del Castillo wrote:
Problem still is - I work in Korea, with a PC in English Win XP, but Lyx
installed into Japanese version for me.
It's rather unlikely that LyX uses Japanese localization just like that. Do
you have set up Japanese for your OS in some way?
Usually, LyX uses the
Christian del Castillo wrote:
> Problem still is - I work in Korea, with a PC in English Win XP, but Lyx
> installed into Japanese version for me.
It's rather unlikely that LyX uses Japanese localization just like that. Do
you have set up Japanese for your OS in some way?
Usually, LyX uses the
.
=
'Christian' Carmelo del Castillo, Ph.D.
Aquatic Biotechnology Center,
Gyeongsang National University,
TEL: +82-55-751-6732 FAX: +82-55-762-6733
MOBILE: +82-01-5737-1521
e-mail: chia...@msn.com
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker t...@lyx.org wrote:
#7023: LyX installer
.
=
'Christian' Carmelo del Castillo, Ph.D.
Aquatic Biotechnology Center,
Gyeongsang National University,
TEL: +82-55-751-6732 FAX: +82-55-762-6733
MOBILE: +82-01-5737-1521
e-mail: chia...@msn.com
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker <t...@lyx.org> wrote:
> #
Maybe the source in SVN still contains basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe, but when I build the installers
I always include the latest version.
But the problem is real and probably Vincent is right:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg150268.html
Can you please have a look?
(I btw.
> Maybe the source in SVN still contains basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe, but when I build the installers
> I always include the latest version.
But the problem is real and probably Vincent is right:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg150268.html
Can you please have a look?
(I
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe from
http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old version that is no
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe
from http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old
Joost Verburg schreef:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe
from http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a lot.
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe" from
"http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old version that is no
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old
Joost Verburg schreef:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/;.
Aha, this explains a
On 29/10/2008 21:01, leuven edwin wrote:
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
OK, thanks, I will move the new page as there's no more comment.
Abdel.
On 29/10/2008 21:01, leuven edwin wrote:
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
OK, thanks, I will move the new page as there's no more comment.
Abdel.
abdel wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
thanks, ed.
On 29/10/2008 20:15, leuven edwin wrote:
abdel wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that
abdel wrote:
I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that I miss the
paragraph that indicates how to suggest a project. But perhaps you're
right that this should be decided on the feature poll page.
i removed that because it seemed incomplete: it only mentioned how to find
ideas
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
edwin
abdel wrote:
>> http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
>
> I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
thanks, ed.
On 29/10/2008 20:15, leuven edwin wrote:
abdel wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that
abdel wrote:
> I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that I miss the
> paragraph that indicates how to suggest a project. But perhaps you're
> right that this should be decided on the feature poll page.
i removed that because it seemed incomplete: it only mentioned how to find
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
edwin
On 27/10/2008 19:01, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox Tell me how
to donate! linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the
windows installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following
On 28/10/2008 08:47, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
will have a look at it tonight...
ed.
From: Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 09:05
To: Christian Ridderström
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Donation page (Was: windows lyx installer)
On 28/10/2008 08:47
On 27/10/2008 19:01, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how
to donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the
windows installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following
On 28/10/2008 08:47, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
will have a look at it tonight...
ed.
From: Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 09:05
To: Christian Ridderström
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Donation page (Was: windows lyx installer)
On 28/10/2008 08:47
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox Tell me how to
donate! linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the webpage and
add a first row with a General Donation. there is too much
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox Tell me how to
donate! linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the
webpage and add a first row
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how to
donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the webpage and
add a first row with a "General Donation". there is too much
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how to
donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the
webpage and add a first row
Your installer does not always take user specific settings into account (file
associations etc.).
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users, a global file association
for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users,
a global file association for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why
should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do this, he can do
this via the folder options of the Windows file explorer as for
> Your installer does not always take user specific settings into account (file
associations etc.).
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users, a global file association
for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users,
a global file association for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why
should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do this, he can do
this via the folder options of the Windows file explorer as for
We have these restrictions here too and the admins absolutely don't like
that users install
things. Even when it is possible with user permissions, some things will
automatically be undone
when relogin. I discussed this with our admins a few times and they
convinced me not to offer
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested out yesterday to install LyX as user-only using your latest
installer. The installation works, but the system I get is not complete
and not very useful - regarding image preview. I ve a full Python
installation, but what if I don't have, does it work to install Python
A bundled subset of Python is installed, you don't need to have Python
installed.
What about Ghostscript?
Ghostscript currently requires administrator privileges to install.
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them with admin priviledges. The
Ghostscript
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them
with admin priviledges. The Ghostscript developers will also not change
this.
I btw. could convince them today to provide Windows binaries for the
version 8.62 they released 2 months ago as this fixes some
>>We have these restrictions here too and the admins absolutely don't like
that users install
>> things. Even when it is possible with user permissions, some things will
automatically be undone
>> when relogin. I discussed this with our admins a few times and they
convinced me not to offer
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested out yesterday to install LyX as user-only using your latest
installer. The installation works, but the system I get is not complete
and not very useful - regarding image preview. I ve a full Python
installation, but what if I don't have, does it work to install Python
> A bundled subset of Python is installed, you don't need to have Python
installed.
>
>>What about Ghostscript?
>
> Ghostscript currently requires administrator privileges to install.
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them with admin priviledges. The
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them
with admin priviledges. The Ghostscript developers will also not change
this.
I btw. could convince them today to provide Windows binaries for the
version 8.62 they released 2 months ago as this fixes some
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Joost Verburg wrote:
I think you misunderstood me.
I think the word 'misunderstanding' probably plays a huge part in the
dramas we see on mailing lists... Perhaps it played a central part in
the recent drama about embedding although I can't say as I didn't follow
it.
on the
installers of
external components and I've been working on all the tools directly linked to
LyX. Both have
helped to improve the quality of LyX on Windows.
Indeed.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why
someone who joined the LyX
installer business much later
Please, only install additional software if it is not already installed.
I think the most important reason why Uwe wants to bundle this software is
because the already
installed version may be outdated.
This is one reason (especially for ImageMagick), the other one the download size and
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But haven't you done so the time Christian tried to bring us working
together? I had this time rewritten major parts of my code as suggested
by Christian. The plan was that these parts will be taken and other
parts of your installer to create a new one which code we both
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is btw. pplatex for?
The DVI post-processing for change tracking.
Joost
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Joost Verburg wrote:
I think you misunderstood me.
I think the word 'misunderstanding' probably plays a huge part in the
"dramas" we see on mailing lists... Perhaps it played a central part in
the recent drama about embedding although I can't say as I didn't follow
. You've worked on the
installers of
> external components and I've been working on all the tools directly linked to
LyX. Both have
> helped to improve the quality of LyX on Windows.
Indeed.
>>And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why
someone who joined th
>>Please, only install additional software if it is not already installed.
>
> I think the most important reason why Uwe wants to bundle this software is
because the already
> installed version may be outdated.
This is one reason (especially for ImageMagick), the other one the download size
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But haven't you done so the time Christian tried to bring us working
together? I had this time rewritten major parts of my code as suggested
by Christian. The plan was that these parts will be taken and other
parts of your installer to create a new one which code we both
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is btw. pplatex for?
The DVI post-processing for change tracking.
Joost
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
My installer had this time some Windows specific settings, so that LyX
under Windows looked a bit different than the Linux version, that not
all developers liked, but these changes were requested by users.
This was the reason why your installer was not accepted as the
helped to improve the
quality of LyX on Windows.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why
someone who joined the LyX installer business much later, don't need to
collaborate with me, but did always what he want without contacting me
before. This is no basis
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
effort with Joost's just say no, no need for another drama after the
embedding stuff :-)
I'm also not interested in long discussion without results. I just want
to say that I don't have strong
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
these things in
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
these things in your installer. That's of course fine with
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
My installer had this time some Windows specific settings, so that LyX
under Windows looked a bit different than the Linux version, that not
all developers liked, but these changes were requested by users.
This was the reason why your installer was not accepted as the
helped to improve the
quality of LyX on Windows.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why
someone who joined the LyX installer business much later, don't need to
collaborate with me, but did always what he want without contacting me
before. This is no basis
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
embedding stuff :-)
I'm also not interested in long discussion without results. I just want
to say that I don't have strong
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
> Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
> pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
> these things
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
these things in your installer. That's of course fine with
Joost Verburg wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer.
I have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you
do a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization
On Friday 18 April 2008 09:30:07 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
effort with Joost's just say no, no need for another drama after the
embedding stuff :-)
I always thought that Fridays are perfect for dramas. :-)
Abdel.
--
José
.)
Time has passed and I reckon there are more and more Windows users; so you'd
do us all a great
favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why someone who joined the LyX
installer business much later, don't need to collaborate
The problem is that most of the installer features are from me and later
bit by bit also used in Joost's installer,
if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why someone
who joined the LyX
there are more and more Windows users;
so you'd do us all a great
favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me?
I had the impression that's what he tried to do with his message, didn't he?
I don't understand why someone who joined the LyX installer
if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
Angus started a Windows installer, I joined him and sent a lot of patches. Angus later retired and I
took over and created my installer. About a year later Joost appeared on the devel-list, and
announced his
Joost Verburg wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer.
I have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you
do a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization
On Friday 18 April 2008 09:30:07 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
> effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
> embedding stuff :-)
I always thought that Fridays are perfect for dramas. :-)
> Abdel.
--
d code by Joost until now, btw.)
> Time has passed and I reckon there are more and more Windows users; so you'd
do us all a great
> favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why someone who joined the LyX
installer busi
; who joined the LyX installer business much later, don't need to collaborate
> with me, but did always what he want without contacting me before. This is
> no basis for a collaboration, I gave up that a collaboration is possible.
that i understand, its harder to get some word from Joost :)
t; Time has passed and I reckon there are more and more Windows users;
so you'd do us all a great
> favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me?
I had the impression that's what he tried to do with his message, didn't he?
I don't understand why
> if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
Angus started a Windows installer, I joined him and sent a lot of patches. Angus later retired and I
took over and created my installer. About a year later Joost appeared on the devel-list, and
announced his
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I've recently rewritten large parts of the official installer in trunk.
Everything should now be much easier to understand (no more stack usage
for functions, more comments and meaningful variable names) and has also
been updated to use the latest NSIS technologies
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer. I
have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you do
a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization and things like
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I've recently rewritten large parts of the official installer in trunk.
Everything should now be much easier to understand (no more stack usage
for functions, more comments and meaningful variable names) and has also
been updated to use the latest NSIS technologies
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer. I
have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you do
a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization and things like
ftp.lyx.org is down.
Here's an alternative download repository:
https://developer.berlios.de/projects/lyxwininstall/
regards Uwe
Hi Uwe,
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
Pavel Sanda gave me this link which works fine:
ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2
So I've used it.
Thanks for working on Lyx. It is superb and works
great.
Tim
--- Uwe
Tim schrieb:
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
You can ignore this, or simpliy use my link and replace https by http.
regards Uwe
Hi Pavel,
That link works great. Thank you.
You should put a note on
http://www.lyx.org/download/
to say the server is down. Otherwise you risk
having newbies give up too quickly and
searching for some other alternative tool.
Lyx is great. It is incredibly useful. Thanks for
working on
ftp.lyx.org is down.
Here's an alternative download repository:
https://developer.berlios.de/projects/lyxwininstall/
regards Uwe
Hi Uwe,
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
Pavel Sanda gave me this link which works fine:
ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2
So I've used it.
Thanks for working on Lyx. It is superb and works
great.
Tim
--- Uwe
Tim schrieb:
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
You can ignore this, or simpliy use my link and replace "https" by "http".
regards Uwe
Hi Pavel,
That link works great. Thank you.
You should put a note on
http://www.lyx.org/download/
to say the server is down. Otherwise you risk
having newbies give up too quickly and
searching for some other alternative tool.
Lyx is great. It is incredibly useful. Thanks for
working on
Hi,
I've tried to download LyX-1.5.2-1-Installer.exe
several times from several different computers from
this page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows
with no success.
I turned off my firewall and virus checker but it did
not help.
I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
Is the server
I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
Is the server down?
yes, it seems to be down.
you can try mirrors
(eg ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2 )
pavel
Hi,
I've tried to download LyX-1.5.2-1-Installer.exe
several times from several different computers from
this page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows
with no success.
I turned off my firewall and virus checker but it did
not help.
I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
Is the server
> I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
>
> Is the server down?
yes, it seems to be down.
you can try mirrors
(eg ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2 )
pavel
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo