Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

2001-07-23 Thread Mike Ressler
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote: > 1.1.6 as well. I'd better do it fast for fix3 I guess. So I can commit > the change to head for it to get in 116 right ? I'll commit if so I've be

Re: "Final" 1.1.6 docs committed

2001-07-23 Thread Mike Ressler
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have detected the following mistakes in the recent changes to the docs : > in the Tutorial, §3.4 / "Your first cross-references", clicking on a cross > reference does not bring you to the label, but opens the Reference popup. > in the User Guide, §3

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

2001-07-23 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote: > > Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ? > > Arg, I didn't help myself by updating Customization - I have many rejected > chunks when trying to apply your pa

Re: "Final" 1.1.6 docs committed

2001-07-23 Thread adrien . rebollo
Hello, I have detected the following mistakes in the recent changes to the docs : in the Tutorial, §3.4 / "Your first cross-references", clicking on a cross reference does not bring you to the label, but opens the Reference popup. in the User Guide, §3.3.8.2, "multiple references can be placed by

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

2001-07-23 Thread cepl
Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to > see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read > (and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all > the inset changes), and applyin

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

2001-07-23 Thread Mike Ressler
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote: > Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ? Arg, I didn't help myself by updating Customization - I have many rejected chunks when trying to apply your patch, mostly due to the new inset code. Is your patch 1.2.0 specific, or d