On 26.07.04, Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation.
This normally happens when you press Enter (or Ctrl-Enter?) If you
realize it immediately, undo (^Z for cua-bindings) is the
Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to Edit-Math-Change Formula
Georg Baum wrote:
Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to
Andrew Morrison wrote:
What it says is this:
\begin{multline}
\mathbf{u}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\int\bigtriangledown p\,
dt\label{eq:part_vel}\end{multline}
You encountered a bug. The menu menu Edit-Math-Change Formula
Type-Displayed don't work with multline environments. You should fill
out a bug
Hi guys! Im new with LyX.
I have problems for creating appendix. I use the book
document class. I tried to put the appendix after the
list of tables where the list of tables are put after
the last chapter. I select the start appendix here
and use the chapter* environment. But the result on
the
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other decorations (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt font in my
tetex
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other decorations (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt font
Thanks, Herbert. I assume I should move the old font file out or delete
it, before replacing it with the new one?
Herbert Voss wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Dear Jürgen,
sorry for a late reply. I am sending you a lyx testfile plus bib-file which
shows the problem with the Bibliography header (takes the header of the
last chapter instead) if LAYOUT PAPER twocolumn document is on, but not,
if off. I did not put it into
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography environment. I am guessing I need
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography
Hi There!
I have a few question:
1. If I do undo while having 'instant-preview' on, it will not
'instant-preview' the equations in this
paragraph until I click onto them again. Is that a known bug?
2. In a multi-line equation environment, how can I delete an
overabundant
line?
3. I would like
On Jul 27, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Herbert Voss wrote:
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to
On 26.07.04, Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation.
This normally happens when you press Enter (or Ctrl-Enter?) If you
realize it immediately, undo (^Z for cua-bindings) is the
Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to Edit-Math-Change Formula
Georg Baum wrote:
Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to
Andrew Morrison wrote:
What it says is this:
\begin{multline}
\mathbf{u}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\int\bigtriangledown p\,
dt\label{eq:part_vel}\end{multline}
You encountered a bug. The menu menu Edit-Math-Change Formula
Type-Displayed don't work with multline environments. You should fill
out a bug
Hi guys! Im new with LyX.
I have problems for creating appendix. I use the book
document class. I tried to put the appendix after the
list of tables where the list of tables are put after
the last chapter. I select the start appendix here
and use the chapter* environment. But the result on
the
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other decorations (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt font in my
tetex
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other decorations (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt font
Thanks, Herbert. I assume I should move the old font file out or delete
it, before replacing it with the new one?
Herbert Voss wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Dear Jürgen,
sorry for a late reply. I am sending you a lyx testfile plus bib-file which
shows the problem with the Bibliography header (takes the header of the
last chapter instead) if LAYOUT PAPER twocolumn document is on, but not,
if off. I did not put it into
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography environment. I am guessing I need
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography
Hi There!
I have a few question:
1. If I do undo while having 'instant-preview' on, it will not
'instant-preview' the equations in this
paragraph until I click onto them again. Is that a known bug?
2. In a multi-line equation environment, how can I delete an
overabundant
line?
3. I would like
On Jul 27, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Herbert Voss wrote:
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to
On 26.07.04, Andrew Morrison wrote:
> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation.
This normally happens when you press Enter (or Ctrl-Enter?) If you
realize it immediately, undo (^Z for cua-bindings) is the
Andrew Morrison wrote:
> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
> deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
> highlighting and going to Edit->Math->Change Formula
Georg Baum wrote:
> Andrew Morrison wrote:
>
>> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
>> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
>> deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
>> highlighting and going to
Andrew Morrison wrote:
What it says is this:
\begin{multline}
\mathbf{u}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\int\bigtriangledown p\,
dt\label{eq:part_vel}\end{multline}
You encountered a bug. The menu menu Edit->Math->Change Formula
Type->Displayed don't work with multline environments. You should fill
out a bug
Hi guys! Im new with LyX.
I have problems for creating appendix. I use the book
document class. I tried to put the appendix after the
list of tables where the list of tables are put after
the last chapter. I select the "start appendix here"
and use the chapter* environment. But the result on
the
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other "decorations" (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt font in my
tetex
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline fraction, sub or
superscript, or other "decorations" (like limits on sums or integrals),
will be in 7 pt. And I seem to have a problem with a 7 pt
Thanks, Herbert. I assume I should move the old font file out or delete
it, before replacing it with the new one?
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> > I think I have finally figured out the source of my problem: When a lyx
> > file uses the default 10 pt font size, then any inline
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Dear Jürgen,
> sorry for a late reply. I am sending you a lyx testfile plus bib-file which
> shows the problem with the Bibliography header (takes the header of the
> last chapter instead) if LAYOUT > PAPER >twocolumn document is on, but not,
> if off. I did not put it
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography environment. I am guessing I need
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to be
defined within the thebibliography
Hi There!
I have a few question:
1. If I do undo while having 'instant-preview' on, it will not
'instant-preview' the equations in this
paragraph until I click onto them again. Is that a known bug?
2. In a multi-line equation environment, how can I delete an
overabundant
line?
3. I would like
On Jul 27, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Herbert Voss wrote:
Stephen Buonopane wrote:
Is there a simple way to start the BibTex citation numbering at
something other than [1]?
BibTex uses the enumiv counter, so I need to do something like
\setcounter{enumiv}{5}, for example to start at 5. But this needs to
39 matches
Mail list logo
