Tim Holy wrote:
And, of course, no lyx_trial.odt file. I even did an updatedb and found
the tex4ht.env file (in two places). Finally, executing the following
command: tex4ht oolatex -e/etc/tex4ht/tex4ht.env lyx_trial
appeared to be successful. It created a whole heap of files, but none of
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able to
Tim Holy wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able
Tim Holy wrote:
And, of course, no lyx_trial.odt file. I even did an updatedb and found
the tex4ht.env file (in two places). Finally, executing the following
command: tex4ht oolatex -e/etc/tex4ht/tex4ht.env lyx_trial
appeared to be successful. It created a whole heap of files, but none of
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able to
Tim Holy wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able
Tim Holy wrote:
> And, of course, no lyx_trial.odt file. I even did an updatedb and found
> the tex4ht.env file (in two places). Finally, executing the following
> command: tex4ht oolatex -e/etc/tex4ht/tex4ht.env lyx_trial
> appeared to be successful. It created a whole heap of files, but none
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
> quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
> By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
> (see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
> but OpenOffice is not able
Tim Holy wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Tim Holy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and \textsubscript
Andreas K. wrote:
Tim Holy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my experience, oolatex tends to be
more reliable than latex2rtf, which
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my
Tim Holy writes:
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Tim Holy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and \textsubscript
Andreas K. wrote:
Tim Holy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my experience, oolatex tends to be
more reliable than latex2rtf, which
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my
Tim Holy writes:
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Tim Holy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
> of papers.
[snip]
> However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and \textsubscript
Andreas K. wrote:
Tim Holy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and
Tim Holy wrote:
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
> of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my experience, oolatex tends to be
more reliable than latex2rtf, which
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
> Tim Holy wrote:
> > At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
> > and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
> > submission of papers.
>
>
> On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Tim Holy wrote:
>>
>>> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
>>> and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
>>> submission of papers.
>>>
>> Try exporting to
Tim Holy writes:
> Hello,
>
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
> of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
> works well with a notable
33 matches
Mail list logo
