Tim Holy wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able to
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
> By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
> (see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
> but OpenOffice is not able to
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
> quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a re
Tim Holy wrote:
> And, of course, no lyx_trial.odt file. I even did an updatedb and found
> the tex4ht.env file (in two places). Finally, executing the following
> command: tex4ht oolatex -e/etc/tex4ht/tex4ht.env lyx_trial
> appeared to be successful. It created a whole heap of files, but none o
Tim Holy writes:
> Hello,
>
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
> of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
> works well with a notable
> On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Tim Holy wrote:
>>
>>> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
>>> and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
>>> submission of papers.
>>>
>> Try exporting to OpenDocu
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
> Tim Holy wrote:
> > At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
> > and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
> > submission of papers.
>
> T
Tim Holy wrote:
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
> of papers.
Try exporting to OpenDocument. In my experience, oolatex tends to be
more reliable than latex2rtf, which ha
Andreas K. wrote:
Tim Holy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
of papers.
[snip]
However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and \textsu
Tim Holy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and
so
> it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission
> of papers.
[snip]
> However, latex2rtf does handle \textsuperscript and \textsubscript
corr
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and subscrip
11 matches
Mail list logo
