[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| "Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
| Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
| Paul pointing back to the standard template
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Paul> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
| Paul> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
| Paul> pointing back to the standard
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
If you are stuck with RH7, what do you
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT
Paul E Johnson said:
If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do?
Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned
on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we
gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote:
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix
"Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
Paul pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
Paul
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
If you are stuck with RH7, what do
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
If you are stuck with RH7, what do you
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT
Paul E Johnson said:
If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do?
Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned
on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we
gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote:
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix
"Paul" == Paul E Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
Paul compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
Paul pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
Paul
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
If you are stuck with RH7, what do
As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
If you are stuck with RH7, what do you
In a message dated: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:03:53 CDT
Paul E Johnson said:
>If you are stuck with RH7, what do you do?
Personally, I'd unstick myself with it and go back to 6.2! We planned
on testing 7.0 here but after 3 days of using it, it became so painful we
gave up in hopes that 7.1 will be
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Paul E Johnson wrote:
> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
> pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
> report at RedHat, and expect they may
> "Paul" == Paul E Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
Paul> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
Paul> pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a
> As noted in this list last week, RH7 is distributed with a bogus
> compiler, gcc-2.96. Lyx does not compile, there are all kinds of errors
> pointing back to the standard template library of c++. I've filed a bug
> report at RedHat, and expect they may fix it.
>
> If you are stuck with RH7,
17 matches
Mail list logo
