Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
>
>> That worked - after closing and re-opening the document.
>>
>> After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document?
>>
>
> I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl files that need
>
2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
> I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx
> file attached). So where do I have to change them?
>
The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of these),
but the bst files ("styles").
Jürgen
2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
> Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets -
> Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
Remove the style completely in the second instance, i.e. the "Style" field
should be empty.
You mi
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
>
>> I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx
>> file attached). So where do I have to change them?
>>
>
> The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of these),
> but the bst
2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu :
> > However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So
> were just not informed that something is wrong before.
>
> Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring
> them? I remarked in the previous beta (hav
2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
> Hi
>
> I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX
> rc but on 2.0.7.1
>
>
> It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one,
> it is working.
>
You get a bibtex error in both cases (look at Tools > La
Hi there!
Murat Yildizoglu wrote:
> Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring
> them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even
> if the PDF does compiles with these errors, Lyx does not show it. It would
> be nice to preview the PDF neve
2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne":
> Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped.
> Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file.
>
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739
Jürgen
Hi
I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX
rc but on 2.0.7.1
Untitled.lyx
Description: Lyx rc1 2.1
Proceedings.bib
Description: bibtex 1
InBook.bib
Description: bibtex 2
Untitled.20.lyx
Description: Lyx 2.0.x file of the document
It has something to do with
> However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So
were just not informed that something is wrong before.
Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring
them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that
even if the PDF does compi
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX
>> rc but on 2.0.7.1
>>
>>
>> It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one,
>> it is working.
>>
>
>
> You get a b
2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
> That worked - after closing and re-opening the document.
>
> After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document?
>
I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl files that need
to be deleted.
>
> A "complete re-compil
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug:
>
>> I did - and I still get an error:
>>
>> ,
>> | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013)
>> | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011
>> | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux
>> | The
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu
wrote:
>
> Maybe I am missing something here, but I am against softwares that decide in
> place of the users. This is one of the reasons why I have never adopted MS
> programs.
>
> If latex accepts to build the file, lyx should accept to show th
Maybe I am missing something here, but I am against softwares that decide
in place of the users. This is one of the reasons why I have never adopted
MS programs.
If latex accepts to build the file, lyx should accept to show the file
built by latex. It is not its job to get on the way of the user.
2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug:
> I did - and I still get an error:
>
> ,
> | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013)
> | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011
> | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux
> | The style file: elsarticle-harv.bst
> | Mu
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne":
>>
>> Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped.
>> Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file.
>
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739
>
2014-03-28 16:03 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne" :
> Yes, sometimes the PDF would be "the wrong one".
> But imagine this case: My thesis had 4 chapters, and was made up from
> 6 documents (Master document+Appendix where 5. and 6.).
> Out of some reasons, the 4th chapter wouldn't compile alone, but ended
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu >:
>
>> > However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So
>> were just not informed that something is wrong before.
>>
>> Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring
>> them
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX
>> rc but on 2.0.7.1
>>
>>
>> It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one,
>> it
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> 2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug :
>
>> Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets -
>> Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>
> Remove the style completely in the second instance, i.e. th
21 matches
Mail list logo
