"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
Lars | solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I
Lars am sure | other software projects have
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Sure, but since it will not happen magically overnight, we have to
| find a workaround.
The workaround is to run the compiler in a non-strict mode. I have
seen that some compilers have -fpermissive.
Lgb
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
Lars | solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I
Lars am sure | other software projects have
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Sure, but since it will not happen magically overnight, we have to
| find a workaround.
The workaround is to run the compiler in a non-strict mode. I have
seen that some compilers have -fpermissive.
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
Lars> | solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I
Lars> am sure | other software
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sure, but since it will not happen magically overnight, we have to
| find a workaround.
The workaround is to run the compiler in a non-strict mode. I have
seen that some compilers have -fpermissive.
Lgb
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
| solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I am sure
| other software projects have this problem too. It would be interesting
| to know how it has been fixed.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
| solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I am sure
| other software projects have this problem too. It would be interesting
| to know how it has been fixed.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, I've heard about this problem... I do not know what a good
| solution would be in this case. A special case for gcc 2.95? I am sure
| other software projects have this problem too. It would be interesting
| to know how it has been fixed.
Hello,
I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now using
gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had upgraded to
gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY picky about type
declarations. The compiler did classify undeclared function types in
Xlib.h and Xutil.h from
"Svante" == Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Svante Hello, I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now
Svante using gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had
Svante upgraded to gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY
Svante picky about type declarations.
Hello,
I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now using
gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had upgraded to
gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY picky about type
declarations. The compiler did classify undeclared function types in
Xlib.h and Xutil.h from
"Svante" == Svante Signell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Svante Hello, I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now
Svante using gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had
Svante upgraded to gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY
Svante picky about type declarations.
Hello,
I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now using
gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had upgraded to
gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY picky about type
declarations. The compiler did classify undeclared function types in
Xlib.h and Xutil.h from
> "Svante" == Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Svante> Hello, I have built the lyx distributions for a long time now
Svante> using gcc-2.7.2.3. However when compiling lyx-1.0.4 I had
Svante> upgraded to gcc-2.95.1 and found out that the compiler is VERY
Svante> picky about type
15 matches
Mail list logo
