Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:16:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
X-message-flag: Sent virus-free from a linux system.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:16, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
While we're at character style, what is planned exactly for this in the
next release ? The original thread was about italic, and you will have
noticed it shifted to \emph, which is very different in fact. In the same
line, \noun
Paul == Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Not really. Emphasized is a symbolic style that means that you want to
emphasize something. In most latex class, this will actually use
italics, but not all (some journals require to use
From: Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:27:06 +
1.4 will support character styles. :-)
This will work per class and not per document, but it is a good first
step. What I mean here is that are defined
, but not all (some journals require to use underline for
that).
Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
. In most latex class, this will
actually use italics, but not all (some journals require to use
underline for that).
Paul Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
Paul italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
The real question is whether you really want italic
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:19:12 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
Paul italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
The real question is whether you really want italic :) I think
emphasize it what you
On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
What do you mean by chracter styles ? A set of lyx functions associated
to given combinations of choices in the Character layout ? I hope it will
not allow to tune locally the chapter, section, etc. layouts...
No, I mean the
From: Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:38:40 +
On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
What do you mean by chracter styles ? A set of lyx functions associated
to given
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:16:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
X-message-flag: Sent virus-free from a linux system.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:16, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
While we're at character style, what is planned exactly for this in the
next release ? The original thread was about italic, and you will have
noticed it shifted to \emph, which is very different in fact. In the same
line, \noun
Paul == Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Not really. Emphasized is a symbolic style that means that you want to
emphasize something. In most latex class, this will actually use
italics, but not all (some journals require to use
From: Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:27:06 +
1.4 will support character styles. :-)
This will work per class and not per document, but it is a good first
step. What I mean here is that are defined
, but not all (some journals require to use underline for
that).
Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
. In most latex class, this will
actually use italics, but not all (some journals require to use
underline for that).
Paul Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
Paul italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
The real question is whether you really want italic
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:19:12 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
Paul italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
The real question is whether you really want italic :) I think
emphasize it what you
On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
What do you mean by chracter styles ? A set of lyx functions associated
to given combinations of choices in the Character layout ? I hope it will
not allow to tune locally the chapter, section, etc. layouts...
No, I mean the
From: Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:38:40 +
On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
What do you mean by chracter styles ? A set of lyx functions associated
to given
>>Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:16:53 -0800 (PST)
>>From: Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
>>X-message-flag: Sent virus-free from a linux system.
>>
>>On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith w
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:16, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
> While we're at character style, what is planned exactly for this in the
> next release ? The original thread was about italic, and you will have
> noticed it shifted to \emph, which is very different in fact. In the same
> line,
> "Paul" == Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Not really. Emphasized is a symbolic style that means that you want to
emphasize something. In most latex class, this will actually use
italics, but not all (some journals
>>From: "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
>>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:27:06 +
>> 1.4 will support character styles. :-)
>> This will work per class and not per docume
his will actually use
> italics, but not all (some journals require to use underline for
> that).
Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
ized is a symbolic style that means that you
>> want to emphasize something. In most latex class, this will
>> actually use italics, but not all (some journals require to use
>> underline for that).
Paul> Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
Paul> itali
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:19:12 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul> Thanks, Jean-Marc. Since, emphasized is not the same thing than
> Paul> italic, how can one define a keybinding for italic?
>
> The real question is whether you really want itali
On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
>
> What do you mean by chracter styles ? A set of lyx functions associated
> to given combinations of choices in the Character layout ? I hope it will
> not allow to tune locally the chapter, section, etc. layouts...
No, I mean
>>From: "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: Re: Keybinding for italic
>>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:38:40 +
>>
>>On Thursday 17 February 2005 09:06, Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
>>>
>>> W
Dear All
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Paul,
From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:26:11 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Thanks
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Rich. In my case,
\bind C-i inset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
Strange!
Paul,
No, I redefined it. :-)
#\bind C-iinset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Then I
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:49:36 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I redefined it. :-)
#\bind C-iinset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Then I copy cua.bind to my.bind just in
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Paul,
Yes. I needed C-e to move to the end of a line so I made C-i the key
instead. The other two font changers are C-b for bold and C-k for (k)apitol;
i.e., small caps which LaTeX uses as the noun
Dear All
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Paul,
From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:26:11 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Thanks
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Rich. In my case,
\bind C-i inset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
Strange!
Paul,
No, I redefined it. :-)
#\bind C-iinset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Then I
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:49:36 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I redefined it. :-)
#\bind C-iinset-toggle # 'i' for Inset
\bind C-i font-emph # 'i' for Italic
Then I copy cua.bind to my.bind just in
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Paul,
Yes. I needed C-e to move to the end of a line so I made C-i the key
instead. The other two font changers are C-b for bold and C-k for (k)apitol;
i.e., small caps which LaTeX uses as the noun
Dear All
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
cua.bind, but with no success.
Paul,
From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
\bind "C-i" "font-emph" # 'i' for Italic
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:26:11 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a keybinding for italic? I looked for it in the file
> > cua.bind, but with no success.
>
>From ~/.lyx/bind/cua.bind on my box:
> \bind "C-i"
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Rich. In my case,
\bind "C-i" "inset-toggle" # 'i' for Inset
Strange!
Paul,
No, I redefined it. :-)
#\bind "C-i""inset-toggle" # 'i' for Inset
\bind "C-i" "font-emph" # 'i' for Italic
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:49:36 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, I redefined it. :-)
>
> #\bind "C-i""inset-toggle" # 'i' for Inset
> \bind "C-i" "font-emph" # 'i' for Italic
>
>Then I copy cua.bind to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Paul Smith wrote:
Just a doubt: is emphasised exactly the same than italic?
Paul,
Yes. I needed C-e to move to the end of a line so I made C-i the key
instead. The other two font changers are C-b for bold and C-k for (k)apitol;
i.e., small caps which LaTeX uses as the noun
45 matches
Mail list logo
