2009/9/2 Delta moins :
> Hello everybody,
> I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about
> one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this
> comes from the Lyx users list". It's very messing because you cannot filter
> the mails efficie
: Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject
2009/9/2 Delta moins :
> Hello everybody,
> I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about
> one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this
> comes from the Lyx users list". I
* Manveru wrote, On 02/09/09 09:18:
> 2009/9/2 Delta moins :
>> Hello everybody,
>> I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised
>> about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people
>> "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very messing beca
> Your message has:
>
> From: "Manveru"
>
> which is not helpful.
>
> I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me.
>
> I'll have to have my sorting rules like this:
>
> 1. sort all list-id mailing lists
> 2. s
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:40:44 -0400, Sam Liddicott
wrote:
Your message has:
From: "Manveru"
which is not helpful.
I've been using Opera mail for a long time, which automatically sorts out
mailing list mail. But I note the following headers:
Mailing-List: contact lyx-users-h...@lists.ly
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:11:26AM +, Delta moins wrote:
> that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very
> messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently.
Yes, you can. This is what List-*: headers are for. This very topic
came up not a month ago on this list.
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
has, say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
Many other mailing lists do this. There should be no need for the
subscribers to have to filter.
Manver
2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
There is many voices in favour of such feature. But not a lot of
people vot
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:33:07 Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> > Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> > If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
>
> You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id head
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 04:53:28 A B wrote:
> I thought it was an unwritte rule: reply to the list, not the list AND
> an explicit email adress (unless they ask to) Or have I got this
> completly wrong?
You're somewhat wrong. On many mailing lists, the custom is to reply to the
list and a
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:44:00AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> I agree with you and have been saying so for years. But even the Mailman
> software suggest replies go to the individual instead of the list. So much
> for> collaboration.
Mailman might be relying on the faint hope that mail user agen
Delta moins wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm very surprised about one thing :
there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people "this comes from the Lyx
users list". It's very messing because you cannot filter the mails efficiently. In
add
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
> I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
> line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
>
> What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
> developerlist or whatever)? Will the list mailer
Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
developerlist or whatever)? Will th
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Delta moins wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and
I'm very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail
subject that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list". It's very
messing because you cannot filter the mails
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote:
2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
There is many voices in favour of such fe
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Sam Liddicott wrote:
* Paul A. Rubin wrote, On 02/09/09 15:57:
I understand there are some concerns about tampering with the subject
line (and what happens when replies and forwards occur).
What about creating a LyX-specific header (X-LyX: userlist or X-LyX:
developerlist o
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm registred to this mailing list for few weeks and I'm
very surprised about one thing : there is no keyword in the mail subject
that tell people "this comes from the Lyx users list".
If you look at the details in the email yo
Hello,
Sorry if the subject was already and recurrently treated in the list. As I
said, I'm new so I didn't know.
In fact, I filter by the "To" field and it works perfectly with Yahoo webmail
so my problem is solved. Once again I should have think a bit before sending my
request on the list...
T
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Manveru wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
> > I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
> > fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
> > say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
>
> There
Le 03/09/2009 19:46, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
I have 42 characters for the subject, given that most messages are
marked with (at least one) 'Re: ', a '[LyX] ' prefix eats 15% of
the available space, for useless 'information'.
Especially since we need [LyX Devel], [LyX Users], etc.
JMarc
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote:
>
>> 2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
>>> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
>>> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
>>> has,
>>> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the sub
Hi LyXers,
I created a survey about explicit subject tagging:
http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/
Feel welcome to fill the answers.
--
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
gg: 1624001
http://www.manveru.pl
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
has, say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
But we don't want that, so please don't wreck it on the server.
If you want to se
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
>> fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has,
>> say, "[LyX]" prepended to the subject.
>>
>
> But we don'
>>
> Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other
> lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx
> users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX].
It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip messages from "l
Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least
the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client.
In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC:
field and sends any "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org" messages to a separate folder.
But I don't want t
But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
Julio Rojas wrote:
Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other
lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading "lyx
users"? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX].
It's a
* Murray Eisenberg wrote, On 11/09/09 14:45:
Likewise, I find no way to modify the header in Thunderbird (at least
the Windows Version), which is a common e-mail client.
In Thunderbird, I can, of course, set up a filter which looks at the CC:
field and sends any "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org" messa
What I suggested was for Gmail not for any particular OS. Sorry for
not being clear.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux!
>
> Julio Rojas wrote:
* Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header.
Sam
* A B wrote, On 02/09/09 09:53:
>> Your message has:
>>
>> From: "Manveru"
>>
>> which is not helpful.
>>
>> I'm currently sorting based on To: or Cc: having lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>> which sadly also selects messages that were emailed to me.
>>
>> I'll have to have my sorting rules like this:
>>
Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> > Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> > If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
>
>
> You're not the only one. I heartily wish it had a list-id header.
* Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33:
> Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
>> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
>>> Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
>>> If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
>>
>> You're not the only one
Delta moins wrote:
Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
If I'm the only for who an explicit mail subject lacks it's ok.
There are more who wants this, but also quite a few who don't want it.
The mail can be sorted by other headers than "Subject".
Once the lyx mailing list
Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
> * Kornel Benko wrote, On 02/09/09 10:33:
> > Am Wednesday 02 September 2009 schrieb Sam Liddicott:
> >> * Delta moins wrote, On 02/09/09 09:28:
> >>> Ok I knew this solution and yeah it works. I will use it.
> >>> If I'm the only for who an ex
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm
> more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not),
> Delivered-To: signifies something else, and my mail server does not
> support it.
>
> http:
* Andrew Sullivan wrote, On 02/09/09 14:10:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>> The Delivered-To: header is not the same as the list-id header - I'm
>> more interested in how the message reached me (via the list or not),
>> Delivered-To: signifies something else, and
Pavel Sanda wrote, On 12/23/-28158 02:59 PM:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Manveru wrote:
2009/9/2 Murray Eisenberg :
I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily
fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server
has,
say,
39 matches
Mail list logo
