Thanks a lot guys. I'll stick to the Note field then.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
the main
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the Author 1976 [1600]
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the key field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
author, it is ignored.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florin Oprina wrote:
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the Author 1976 [1600]
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the key field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
author, it is ignored.
Yes, you can get that, but not
Thanks a lot guys. I'll stick to the Note field then.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
the main
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the Author 1976 [1600]
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the key field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
author, it is ignored.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florin Oprina wrote:
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the Author 1976 [1600]
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the key field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
author, it is ignored.
Yes, you can get that, but not
Thanks a lot guys. I'll stick to the "Note" field then.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julio Rojas wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
>>
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the "Author 1976 [1600]"
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the "key" field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
"author", it is ignored.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL
Florin Oprina wrote:
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the "Author 1976 [1600]"
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the "key" field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
"author", it is ignored.
Yes, you can get that, but
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
the main technical question, the how do I do it in BibTeX, remains
unanswered. Is there a Note or Previously Published field in
BibTeX? How do I solve this problem using the available fields?
There are
Julio Rojas wrote:
Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
the main technical question, the how do I do it in BibTeX, remains
unanswered. Is there a Note or Previously Published field in
BibTeX? How do I solve this problem using the available fields?
There are
Julio Rojas wrote:
> Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
> the main technical question, the how do I do it in BibTeX, remains
> unanswered. Is there a "Note" or "Previously Published" field in
> BibTeX? How do I solve this problem using the available fields?
>
killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
That's part of the protocol you're using for citing sources, which is
a question for you and
killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
That's part of the protocol you're using for citing sources, which is
a question for you and
killermike wrote:
>>
> This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
> you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
> paperback, what do you put for the date?
That's part of the protocol you're using for citing sources, which is
a question for you
wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted
.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add
wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted
.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add
heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> killermike wrote:
>>
>> Julio Rojas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
>>> have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
>>> or
how helpful you arem not only with
> LyX, but with the whole LaTeX package.
> -
> Julio Rojas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> killermike wrote:
>
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted books
using Bibtex.
Thx
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I have
a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the original
printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted book
information? Or is there a proper way
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted books
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
I would use author. 1976. title. publisher. Reprint of original 1600
True, this seems to be the most honest way. However, if I see the
citation: Darwin (1997), it looks a bit strange, like Darwin's still
alive and publishing . On the othe hand, if I see Darwin (1859), I now
it's The Origin of Species, so I won't even have to look at the
bibliography.
On Fri, Aug
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted books
using Bibtex.
Thx
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I have
a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the original
printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted book
information? Or is there a proper way
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite reprinted books
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
I would use author. 1976. title. publisher. Reprint of original 1600
True, this seems to be the most honest way. However, if I see the
citation: Darwin (1997), it looks a bit strange, like Darwin's still
alive and publishing . On the othe hand, if I see Darwin (1859), I now
it's The Origin of Species, so I won't even have to look at the
bibliography.
On Fri, Aug
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a proper way to cite
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" way to cite reprinted books
using Bi
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I have
a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the original
printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted book
information? Or is there a "proper
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" way to cite repri
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
I would use ". 1976. . . Reprint of original 1600
manuscript." That's
True, this seems to be the most honest way. However, if I see the
citation: Darwin (1997), it looks a bit strange, like Darwin's still
alive and publishing . On the othe hand, if I see Darwin (1859), I now
it's "The Origin of Species", so I won't even have to look at the
bibliography.
On Fri, Aug
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" w
39 matches
Mail list logo
