Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am sorry that I can't help except perhaps with testing/writing the helps
> (the advantage would be, that I always manage to do the wrong things if
> the advices are not idiot-proof ...)
Testing and entering the results in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 20:09:38 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> >> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
> >> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
>>
>> No, it gets the filename as an argument, and then generates the new
>> version. You can actually read that off of the file lyx2lyx itself,
>> which is a script: "usage: %prog [options] [file]". Opt
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 17:10:56 schrieb David L. Johnson:
> On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file
> >> in your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the
> >> same), it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx
>
> You can copy the lyx2lyx script (or directory of scripts) from the
> development version (2.1) to the stable one. Then, 2.0 will be able to
> open 2.1 files with auto-conversion.
good to know!
converting larger documents with lyx2lyx takes quite some time!
Wolfgang
On 03/05/2013 02:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
filename filename should work.
Mind
On 2013-03-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. Ho
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 09:29:13 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> yes, I could and did. However, I have quite a lot of lyx files created by
> the 2.1 version and was hoping the lyx2lyx would already contain the
> conversion 2.1 to 2.0, so that I could run a batch. But, if I understand
> correctly
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013, 08:47:04 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
>
> LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
> format is consta
Am Dienstag 05 März 2013, 07:17:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> former lyx 2.1.0svn created lyx files which lyx 2.0.5.1 does not take
LyX 2.0 cannot read files made with LyX 2.1. How could it? The 2.1. file
format is constantly evolving. Only the very last release of the 2.0.x series
will be ab
> For reasons I don't understand, debian does not put the lyx2lyx file in
> your path. On my machine (testing, not unstable, but it is the same),
> it is in /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/ so /usr/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
> filename filename should work.
>
Mind you, I compiled and installed lyx 2.0.5-1
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 19:56:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > 1-
> >
> > former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> > Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber
> > das lyx2ly
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Now it works after following your advices. Two questions left:
>
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konverti
On 03/04/2013 01:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> 1-
> former lyx 2.0.5-1 created lyx files which lyx 2.0.3-3 does not take:
> Blumenuhr-neu20120302.lyx stammt von einer neueren LyX-Version, aber das
> lyx2lyx-Skript konnte das Dokument nicht konvertieren
This is strange. If you open t
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 15:31:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> >> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> >> > This is, what I get by test-running
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
>> > with
>> > wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/hom
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:13:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> > This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> > with
> > wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
>
> So configure and make su
Am Montag 04 März 2013, 14:09:16 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
So configure and make suceeded?
> [1] 15863
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
> with
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
> [1] 15863
> wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
> Ignoring unkn
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 14:05:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Thanks, Jürgen.
> > What is the difference between a smaller binary and normal binary in
> > respect to funtionality of Lyx? -->
> >
> > 4) make install
> >
> >will install it. You can use "
This is, what I get by test-running the installed lyx 2.0.5-1
with
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ ./src/lyx &
[1] 15863
wolfgang@wolfgang:/mnt/sda/home/wolfgang/lyx-2.0.5.1$ LyXRC.cpp (1130):
Ignoring unknown flag `zipped=native' for format `dia'.
LyXRC.cpp (1130): Ignoring
22 matches
Mail list logo
