On Sat, 19 May 2018 18:35:25 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit :
> > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather
> > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2,
> > with the = in the middle. That way,
Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit :
I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather than
AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2, with the
= in the middle. That way, following lines will have the = sign
aligned, which IMO is how it should be.
Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit :
But LyX doesn't understand them as delimiters unless they are written
as such.
Since 2.3, LyX knows the class (mathopen, mathclose, matrel...) of the
insets. This has been used actually to generalize the old code which
only looked at = sign AF
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +, David L. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather
> > > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2,
> > > with the = in th
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 01:02:05PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
> > turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
> > environment. To do t
On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather
> > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2,
> > with the = in the middle. That way, following lines will have the
> > = sign aligned, which I
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:08:43PM +, David L. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX
> > will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an
> > "align" environment.
On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX
> will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an
> "align" environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current
> equation into two parts. For exam
Le 19/05/2018 à 13:46, Hal Kierstead a écrit :
I use this all the time. The slider would be useful as I often end up
cutting and pasting. But I do not need the graphics; an easy way to
insert the “&” at the right place would be great.
Indeed a "split here" would be good. The automatic detectio
t;
>>> P(X < 3) = 2
>>>
>>> Currently LyX splits this on the "<". I would like to have the algorithm
>>> prioritize a relation character that is outside of delimiters.
>>>
>>> Before I look at the code, I want to
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:39:09AM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
> I may recommend to develop a tool where you can slide the location of "&" in
> the equation. Something like tab sign in Word.
I can see how that would be useful, especially for when there are many
lines. I think it is too ambitious f
On 5/19/2018 8:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into
two parts. For example, if the equation
When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into
two parts. For example, if the equation is:
y = 3x + 5
LyX guesses that you want "y
On 01/18/2012 05:06 AM, Lesław Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to learn how to use the math equation editor in LyX,
and I have encontered a problem. The manual says that while writing integrals
one should pay special attention to correctly writing the "d" letter, which
is an operator
Hi,
I am trying to learn how to use the math equation editor in LyX,
and I have encontered a problem. The manual says that while writing integrals
one should pay special attention to correctly writing the "d" letter, which
is an operator, hence it should be written as an upright
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I've never dug into the reason for this,
Paul,
Neither have I because I need it so infrequently.
... but I think that some packages (and "rotating" may be one of them, if
that's the correct name) only work with PDF output.
Looks reasonable.
Rich Shepard appl-ecosys.com> writes:
>I do the above, save the document, and look at the dvi preview. It's not
> rotated but in the upper right corner of the page and off both margins. But
> ... A-ha! It is rotated in the pdflatex output.
>
>It occurred to me that sometimes the dvi pre
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
Perhaps this should be directed to whomever maintains t
Rich Shepard writes:
>Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
> allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
--
Enrico
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give
you margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you
access to multiline equation formats.
Paul,
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only in
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multi
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multiline equation formats.
2. Rotating a table i
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
table within \being{sidewaystable} and \end{sidewaystable}, or
\being{landscape} and \end{landscape}.
See? It's that sort of a day. Those should be \begin{... and not
\being{...
Sigh,
Rich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
I've given
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there a way to do this?
I found the rotating package, but I'm having difficulty using it. Perhaps
I need to modify the LaTeX output manually?
Rich
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
Making the font a smaller size is one solution, but I
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:39 PM, jong wrote:
> @Liviu/// Thanks for the suggestion. But I gave up elyxer because I couldn't
> install in in my laptop (Windows 7 machine). Although I consider myself one of
> the skilled users of windows computers, I was completely lost when I tried to
> install el
On 05/28/2011 05:39 PM, jong wrote:
>
> So I switched to Ubuntu 11.04 with Lyx2.0
>
> It came with two html export option (html and Lyxhtml) - It seems that one of
> these two utilize elyxer but not sure which one is which.
>
HTML uses elyxer if it is installed. LyXHTML is always the internal LyX
r
Hi jong,
The problems with display equations has already been reported and will be
solved for the next version of elyxer. I will send a message to the list
when it's ready, as usual.
Cheers,
Alex.
Good
El 28/05/2011 23:55, "jong" escribió:
> Liviu Andronic gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> On Fri, A
Liviu Andronic gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Jong Kook Shin hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to have high resolution images (300ppi?) of math equations when I
> > export my lyx files into html, which will ultimately be converted to MSword
> > file.
> > Current
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Jong Kook Shin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to have high resolution images (300ppi?) of math equations when I
> export my lyx files into html, which will ultimately be converted to MSword
> file.
> Currently, it seems that the math equations and other figures are convert
Jong Kook Shin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to have high resolution images (300ppi?) of math equations when I
> export my lyx files into html, which will ultimately be converted to MSword
> file.
> Currently, it seems that the math equations and other figures are converted
> to 72ppi. For screen disp
On 03/31/2011 10:33 PM, Jong Kook Shin wrote:
Hi,
I want to have high resolution images (300ppi?) of math equations when
I export my lyx files into html, which will ultimately be converted to
MSword file.
Currently, it seems that the math equations and other figures are
converted to 72ppi. Fo
Hi,
I want to have high resolution images (300ppi?) of math equations when I
export my lyx files into html, which will ultimately be converted to
MSword file.
Currently, it seems that the math equations and other figures are
converted to 72ppi. For screen display, it works perfect but I need t
On 1/23/07, Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
two-column style:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
like:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t
>>From: Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: math equation in two lines
>>Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:06:51 +0100
>>
>>How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
>>two-col
How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
two-column style:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
like:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)
=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
(the _ are in Lyx the rectangular laying
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:08:20AM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I was lazy and typed several pages with ordinary text for variables x,
> y, and z. Later, I wanted to convert those to math, and I try to
> highlight the things and hit C-m. That does create the math box, but it
> does not convert
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:25:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Paul Johnson schrieb:
>
> >I was lazy and typed several pages with ordinary text for variables x,
> >y, and z. Later, I wanted to convert those to math, and I try to
> >highlight the things and hit C-m. That does create the math box,
On 28.06.05, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Paul Johnson schrieb:
>
> >I was lazy and typed several pages with ordinary text for variables x,
> >y, and z. Later, I wanted to convert those to math, and I try to
> >highlight the things and hit C-m. That does create the math box, but it
> >does not convert
Paul Johnson schrieb:
I was lazy and typed several pages with ordinary text for variables x,
y, and z. Later, I wanted to convert those to math, and I try to
highlight the things and hit C-m. That does create the math box, but it
does not convert the existing character to the math font. The
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:08:20 -0500
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Lyx work that way on your system?
>
Yes - Math mode is not analogous to 'Bold' or 'Italic', it's a completely
different work environment.
If it's only x's and y's (no real formulas), you could select one, assign
I was lazy and typed several pages with ordinary text for variables x,
y, and z. Later, I wanted to convert those to math, and I try to
highlight the things and hit C-m. That does create the math box, but it
does not convert the existing character to the math font. The only fix
I could find
I Wayan Warmada wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Rodney Kanno wrote:
>
>>I need help writing a element symbol (sim to H2O) the symbol should be like:
>>
>> =
>>CO
>> 3
>>
>
>type CO the C-m --> type ^= --> move the cursor down (still in math box) --> type _3
>
>Wayan
>
>
Ahh so easy..and I w
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Rodney Kanno wrote:
> I need help writing a element symbol (sim to H2O) the symbol should be like:
>
> =
> CO
> 3
type CO the C-m --> type ^= --> move the cursor down (still in math box) --> type _3
Wayan
I need help writing a element symbol (sim to H2O) the symbol should be like:
=
CO
3
I hope that shows correctly...but basically it's like CO2, but the =
sign and the # 3 are above each other in superscript and subscript. I
guess it would be like using the fraction without the line.
46 matches
Mail list logo
