On 09/25/2018 03:54 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
OK Paul,
I made a sort file and tested the "replace all"
It works, but, it leaves the spellchecker mode at the end,
while it could have kept it open, by
1) dealing with the next occurrence to potentially correct (keeping in mind
that it wi
On 2.3.1, Mac 10.13.6 it shows same behavior.
el
On 25/09/2018 09:54, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> OK Paul,
>
> I made a sort file and tested the "replace all"
> It works, but, it leaves the spellchecker mode at the end,
> while it could have kept it open, by
> 1) dealing
OK Paul,
I made a sort file and tested the "replace all"
It works, but, it leaves the spellchecker mode at the end,
while it could have kept it open, by
1) dealing with the next occurrence to potentially correct (keeping in mind
that it will have to deal with all the replacements previo
On 09/24/2018 03:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Using the spellchecker (F7), it seems that the option "replace all"
does not work. It just leaves the mode.
It works for me. Can you give specific steps that lead to failure?
Paul
Hello,
Using the spellchecker (F7), it seems that the option "replace all"
does not work. It just leaves the mode.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Phys
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:07:45AM +, David Pesetsky wrote:
> I see — the discussion seems to have gotten a bit confused around eight years
> ago, but the discussion around three years ago hits the nail on the head. It
> should work this way in "replace all", and no
I see — the discussion seems to have gotten a bit confused around eight years
ago, but the discussion around three years ago hits the nail on the head. It
should work this way in "replace all", and not in simple find or find-replace.
I am not a member of the Lyx team, obviously, s
On 08/06/2017 06:52 PM, David Pesetsky wrote:
I just learned the (very) hard way that Lyx, unlike standard word processors and other
text-manipulating software that I've used, does not limit the effect of "replace
all" to selected text (when something has been selected).
Am I
I just learned the (very) hard way that Lyx, unlike standard word processors
and other text-manipulating software that I've used, does not limit the effect
of "replace all" to selected text (when something has been selected).
Am I unaware of some switch that can change this be
> >> not writing in our native language), it is unconvenient to have to
> >> replace every individual ocurrence.
> >>
> >> I think "Replace All" would save a lot of time and avoid many
> >> unneeded clicks (and hence chances of mistake
ocurrence.
I think "Replace All" would save a lot of time and avoid many
unneeded clicks (and hence chances of mistake). Is it feasible for
LyX 1.5 stable?
Someone should file a bugzilla request.
rh
--
==
Richard
ocurrence.
I think "Replace All" would save a lot of time and avoid many unneeded clicks
(and hence chances of mistake). Is it feasible for LyX 1.5 stable?
--
Dr. Hellmut Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172
D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-1
Greetings,
I wonder if it would be possible to improve the spellchecker dialog by
adding
a "Replace all" button.
When you mistype a word repeatedly (quite usual for those who are not
writing
in our native language), it is unconvenient to have to rep
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:50:18AM +0200, Laszlo E. Szabo wrote:
> I have the following problem in 1.2.0: In the search/replace window, pressing
> keyboard key is understood as "Replace all", that is, it starts to
> replace all. Now, this mistake depends on the Lin
Hi,
I have the following problem in 1.2.0: In the search/replace window, pressing
keyboard key is understood as "Replace all", that is, it starts to
replace all. Now, this mistake depends on the Linux default language
environment! I have this problem if it is Hungarian. If,
15 matches
Mail list logo
