Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before asking
this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations environment.
Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:eq1}
\begin{equation}
Some math
\end{equation
On 04/09/2013 9:45 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before
asking this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations
environment. Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before asking
this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations environment.
Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:eq1}
\begin{equation}
Some math
\end{equation
On 04/09/2013 9:45 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before
asking this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations
environment. Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before asking
this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations environment.
Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:eq1}
\begin{equation}
\end{equation}
\begin
On 04/09/2013 9:45 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before
asking this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations
environment. Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label
HL2050 wrote
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using
LyX 1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in
a new LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clue at all. Can
HL2050 wrote
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using
LyX 1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in
a new LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clue at all. Can
HL2050 wrote
>
> Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
> equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using
> LyX 1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in
> a new LyX file.
Hwan Lin schrieb:
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at use AMS math
package automatically. These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it can not deal
Hwan Lin schrieb:
Attached is a LyX file that cannot go with subequations. Please have a
look and help me.
Why haven't you followed my advice to set the AMS option as I wrote? Doing this, subequations will
be known by LaTeX as I explained.
Besides this, there were was a mistake: You set
Hwan Lin schrieb:
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at use AMS math
package automatically. These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it can not deal
Hwan Lin schrieb:
Attached is a LyX file that cannot go with subequations. Please have a
look and help me.
Why haven't you followed my advice to set the AMS option as I wrote? Doing this, subequations will
be known by LaTeX as I explained.
Besides this, there were was a mistake: You set
Hwan Lin schrieb:
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at "use AMS math
package automatically." These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it ca
Hwan Lin schrieb:
Attached is a LyX file that cannot go with subequations. Please have a
look and help me.
Why haven't you followed my advice to set the AMS option as I wrote? Doing this, subequations will
be known by LaTeX as I explained.
Besides this, there were was a mistake: You set
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clue at all. Can anyone help.
Thanks
HL2050 schrieb:
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out.
You need to assure
Hello, Uwe,
Thanks for your kindness.
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at use AMS math
package automatically. These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it can
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clue at all. Can anyone help.
Thanks
HL2050 schrieb:
Hello, I used \begin{subequations} and \end{subequations} to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out.
You need to assure
Hello, Uwe,
Thanks for your kindness.
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at use AMS math
package automatically. These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it can
Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clue at
HL2050 schrieb:
Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figur
Hello, Uwe,
Thanks for your kindness.
>From my other papers, on math options, it was set at "use AMS math
package automatically." These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understa
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:36:26PM +0100, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:36:26PM +0100, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:36:26PM +0100, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
> A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
> If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
> 8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
> then write \begin{subequations} before the
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula,
and \end{subequations} after the 3rd formula.
Now I want to use
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula,
and \end{subequations} after the 3rd formula.
Now I want to use
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula,
and \end{subequations} after the 3rd formula.
Now I want to use
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which is the correspondent command of \eqno, (if it exists
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which is the correspondent command of \eqno, (if it exists
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
>
> can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
> > can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
>
> numbered or unnumbered subequations?
>
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which is the correspondent c
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
>
> > > can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
> >
> > numbered or unnumbered subequations?
> >
> numbered.
>
> I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
> . (1)
> .
39 matches
Mail list logo
