On 04/09/2013 9:45 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before
asking this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations
environment. Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\
Ok, I know I should've first read the whole AMSmath documentation before asking
this but... this is faster...
Say I have a bunch of equations within a labeled subequations environment.
Something like (in LaTeX):
...
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:eq1}
\begin{equation}
\end{equation}
\
HL2050 wrote
>
> Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
> equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using
> LyX 1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in
> a new LyX file. I j
Hwan Lin schrieb:
Attached is a LyX file that cannot go with subequations. Please have a
look and help me.
Why haven't you followed my advice to set the AMS option as I wrote? Doing this, subequations will
be known by LaTeX as I explained.
Besides this, there were was a mistake: Yo
Hwan Lin schrieb:
From my other papers, on math options, it was set at "use AMS math
package automatically." These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't understand why it ca
Hello, Uwe,
Thanks for your kindness.
>From my other papers, on math options, it was set at "use AMS math
package automatically." These papers worked perfectly with
subequations.
The current paper that bothers me also has the same math option as
above-mentioned. I don't und
HL2050 schrieb:
Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't fig
Hello, I used "\begin{subequations}" and "\end{subequations}" to have
equations in between. It worked on my two earlier research papers using LyX
1.6 mac os snow leopard. But suddenly the same way stopped working in a new
LyX file. I just can't figure it out. No clu
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:36:26PM +0100, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
> A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
> If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
> 8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
> then write \begin{subequations} before the
A few months ago Dekel gave sombody on the list the following advice on subequations:
If you want your formulae to be numbered like this:
8.46, 8.47a, 8.47b, 8.48,...
then write \begin{subequations} before the 2nd formula,
and \end{subequations} after the 3rd formula.
Now I want to use this in a
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
>
> > > can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
> >
> > numbered or unnumbered subequations?
> >
> numbered.
>
> I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
> . (1)
> . (2)
> > can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
>
> numbered or unnumbered subequations?
>
numbered.
I must also number some equations in a chapter/section/exercise:
. (1)
. (2)
. (3)
but I don't know how to do that.
Which is the correspondent comm
becherini yvonne Gruppo II wrote:
>
> can I put a left bracket on a set of subequations?
numbered or unnumbered subequations?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
13 matches
Mail list logo
