Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-07 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 06. juni 2016 12:57, skrev F M Salter: Hi I am attaching a small table which produces erroneous output. 1. mathematical symbol m in headings 2. non-alignment of decimal points Any suggestions? Suggestion attached. When looking at your table, I saw that you're using

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread Paul A . Rubin
F M Salter blueyonder.co.uk> writes: > > > I had a table, with no apparent problems, but with vertical > separators.  Publication requires a formal table! > I have not found any way to set up a heading layout other than what > is essentially the default. >     Setting up

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread F M Salter
On 06/06/12:59-0700, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > Hi > > I am attaching a small table which produces erroneous output. > > > > 1. mathematical symbol m in headings > > 2. non-alignment of decimal points > > > > Any suggestions? > > > === > T

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread Paul A . Rubin
F M Salter blueyonder.co.uk> writes: > > Hi > I am attaching a small table which produces erroneous output. > > 1. mathematical symbol m in headings > 2. non-alignment of decimal points > > Any suggestions? > The second problem is easily fixed: enter the numbers in the table

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread John Kane
Ah, I had my pdf viewer at too low a magnification and missed that m . Very weird. I wonder if it has anything to do with the two cells in "base year"? So far my experiments have not been useful so I may well be wrong Re the 2 vs 3 digits, I am not sure but I suspect that using 2 & 3 digits in th

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread F M Salter
On 06/06/16 13:54, John Kane wrote: > I don't think I understand the point about the "m". It is a math > symbol in the lyx file so one would expect it to be one in the output? Sorry, I was obviously too terse. An additional /m/ appears in the 3rd column under the fraction > > I am not very good

Re: 2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread John Kane
I don't think I understand the point about the "m". It is a math symbol in the lyx file so one would expect it to be one in the output? I am not very good with LyX tables (I usually generate mine with R and knitr) but it looks to me that you need three numbers after the decimal in the last column

2.2 -- table problems

2016-06-06 Thread F M Salter
Hi I am attaching a small table which produces erroneous output. 1. mathematical symbol m in headings 2. non-alignment of decimal points Any suggestions? Regards Frank Salter table.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Søren O'Neill wrote: I appreciate your comments. I'm not that exerienced a LyX user, but must say I find the table functions very cumbersome and generally not quite sufficient. Actually I've been here before about a year ago, (needed the dynamic referencing), but abandoned it because of the tab

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Søren O'Neill
nly is the one issue that keeps popping up as a problem for me. Soren On Thursday 04 August 2005 18:47, samar wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Geoffrey Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ; "Herbert Voss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, Aug

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread samar
- Original Message - From: "Geoffrey Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "Herbert Voss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 9:33 PM Subject: Re: weird table problems in Lyx - Original Message - From: "Herbert Voss"

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
- Original Message - From: "Herbert Voss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:42 PM Subject: Re: weird table problems in Lyx Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stacia Hartleben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: S

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stacia Hartleben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:18 PM Subject: weird table problems in Lyx I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but most times when I make a table, the

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stacia Hartleben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:18 PM Subject: weird table problems in Lyx I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but most times when I make a table, the

Re: weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
- Original Message - From: "Stacia Hartleben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:18 PM Subject: weird table problems in Lyx I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but most times when I make a table, the first row of the table is s

weird table problems in Lyx

2005-08-04 Thread Stacia Hartleben
I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but most times when I make a table, the first row of the table is seperate than the others. I can get around this by deleting and inserting more rows, but it's a pain. What am I doing wrong? Also, is there an easy way to set the lines of the table to not s

lyx 1.1.6fix1 table into table problems

2001-03-28 Thread Juan Ramon Rico
Hi everybody: If you create a table into a another table cell... when you are at a cell in that cell not is possible activate TEX mode nor change the size font. Anybody know something about this problem? Thanks in advanced.   __

table problems

1999-09-14 Thread Michael Halleck
> > Yes, I'm well aware of the C-Enter, but if you have inserted one of > > these c-enters then you wont get rid of them anymore, at least thats > > what happened to me. So my table tends to loose its form after editing > > it a short while. That's not very pleasant, don't you think ? > > Thanks,

RE: table problems

1999-09-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > If you delete a row, then this row will be deleted within all columns. I > understand, that this is the definition of a row. Then I don't understand what you want? > But I inserted c-enter to force line breaks for display purpose only. > I had to, otherwise the table would have exceeded t