On 11/13/20 1:23 PM, Bert Put wrote:
The version of TS-DOS (v4.00) that I use is included in Ultimate ROM II
(v2.12). It has been rock solid for me as well, primarily with a NADSBox.
TS-DOS is not included in UR-2.
UR-2 only includes a loader that loads-runs-discards DOS100.CO or
DOS200.CO
On Nov 13, 2020, at 11:01 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
> Would be good to identify /confirm the features that don't work, add that to
> a wiki page.
Do you have specifics about what's not working for you? I'd be happy to spend
time to try to confirm the issues over the coming weekend.
ok good to know that one is around, and is better.
What I am seeing though is that 4.00 "DOS-ON" really doesn't work too well.
the TEXT commands are broken for sure.
Would be good to identify /confirm the features that don't work, add that
to a wiki page.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM Joshua
On Nov 13, 2020, at 10:18 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
> is TSDOS 4.1 posted at the personal directory?
At one time it was not but Kurt mailed it to the list and I put a copy in my S3
bucket.
http://public.nachomountain.com/files/m100/
The version of TS-DOS (v4.00) that I use is included in Ultimate ROM II
(v2.12). It has been rock solid for me as well, primarily with a NADSBox.
Cheers,Bert
On 11/13/20 12:02 PM, Joshua O'Keefe wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
>> What is the best version of
thanks Kurt;
is TSDOS 4.1 posted at the personal directory?
thx!
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:16 PM Kurt McCullum wrote:
> The only changes I made to 4.1 were to put the fix for the the shift down
> error that Ken put into the RAM versions. Everything else is identical to
> 4.0. The SARDOS ROM is
The only changes I made to 4.1 were to put the fix for the the shift down error
that Ken put into the RAM versions. Everything else is identical to 4.0. The
SARDOS ROM is a merge of SARDINE and TS-DOS 4.1. Same TS-DOS.
Kurt
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Joshua O'Keefe wrote:
>
> On Nov
On Nov 13, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
> What is the best version of TS-DOS?
My favorite by far has been Kurt's "4.10" version that he made both for SARDOS
and separately. It's been rock solid for me, contains fixes, and the separate
TS-DOS ROM is what I keep installed more than
Hi folks,
Something I have never really paid much attention to is TS-DOS versions.
I know that there are multiple versions though.
Using 4.00 I think there could be some bugs dealing with "DOS-ON"
feature. Also, there is the directory listing bug.
What is the best version of TS-DOS?
thx
Steve
On Nov 13, 2020, at 2:01 AM, Jim Anderson wrote:
> I tried running WINSTALL using my copy of WS3.3 I installed on my M100 and it
> complains about WS.INS and aborts.
Mine does this too, now that I went back to it. I don't know what changed! I
know for sure I had 3.3 WINSTALL working because
> -Original Message-
> When I looked at this, I saw that it was based on the z80 code written
> [...]
> Trying to access the unix fs directly, I could run the ws.com in the
> tests directory and it save the file to my unix filesystem. Winstall
> there gave an error, but I've seen this
> -Original Message-
>
> Exactly, altering the drive tables of the Linux emulator should enable
> execution of an M100 CP/M image I would think. Conversely, massaging the
> image to suit what the emulator expects might be the way to go. You'd
> need to be conversant with "CP/M Alteration
> -Original Message-
> Since I asked the original question about CP/M emulation I thought I
> should share what I had been using to prompt it:
>
> This emulator has BDOS integration directly to the filesystem (no
> getunix/putunix because it just sees the host directory):
I'm really glad
> -Original Message-
> what I have, there are differences. As you stated, if I took out the -
> DPOSIX_TTY from the Makefile, the github source compiled for me, and I
> could get the A> prompt, but the drive was empty so I couldn't test
> getunix.com and putunix.com because they weren't
> -Original Message-
> point is, it is not a straight binary dump.
>
> Said another way, if there is an agreed format for making an M100 CP/M
> A: disk dump accessible on simulated CP/M, lets look at that for next
> drop of RXCUTL.
Well, for what it does (image backup/restore) whether
15 matches
Mail list logo
