Re: [M100] NODE DATAPAC

2023-09-12 Thread Ben Wiley Sittler
Nice! Yah, I was assuming you would want two pieces that interlock somehow and use the holes for alignment/registration. I guess a retained metal thread or indented nut in one half of the shell could allow easy screwing and unscrewing from the other side using very short bolts or screws, and might

Re: [M100] NODE DATAPAC

2023-09-12 Thread Brian White
Should be no problem. I wasn't sure how best to do a case yet so that's why it has holes in the corners. One basic option is just a cover on the out side held on your only by glue or mounting tape, and using the holes for registration or alignment, and maybe also for glue, or just friction, make

Re: [M100] rexcpm battery

2023-09-12 Thread Brian K. White
I've done a little more testing. The GND path is backfeeding only via the RAM line. Nothing on /WR. (the only possible connections) I am measuring only 6.6uA on the RAM_RST line between the two boards with the boards outside of the 100. That is a little high but actually not too bad. I

Re: [M100] NODE DATAPAC

2023-09-12 Thread Ben Wiley Sittler
That's great work! Is there enough clearance around the modern version that a 3d-printed case could fit? On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 01:47 Brian K. White wrote: > > The unverified schematic I arrived at from beeping out an original NODE > DATAPAC is now verified. > > Based on that best guess original

[M100] NODE DATAPAC

2023-09-12 Thread Brian K. White
The unverified schematic I arrived at from beeping out an original NODE DATAPAC is now verified. Based on that best guess original schematic I made a new schematic that uses 1 256k sram instead of 8 32k sram, but otherwise replicates the original circuit with the way the binary counters