Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

TS-DOS (EP)ROM > (assuming of course that one has the means to (re)program the EPROM, which a > number of us do)? Are the contents different in some way? > > m > - Original Message - > From: Ken Pettit <mailto:petti...@gmail.com> > To: Model 100 Discussion <mail

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

  m - Original Message -  From: Ken Pettit To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:42 AM Subject: Re: [M100]

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

unless it is >>>> actually EPROM, and then only with a UV eraser and device programmer). >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> On 5/6/16 10:08 PM, Mike Stein wrote: >>>>> Hi Ken, >>>>> >>>>> Why is this fix only availa

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

ke Stein wrote: >>>> Hi Ken, >>>> >>>> Why is this fix only available for TS-DOS from REX and not the TS-DOS >>>> (EP)ROM (assuming of course that one has the means to (re)program the >>>> EPROM, which a number of us do)? Are the contents

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

mail.com> *To:*Model 100 Discussion <mailto:m100@lists.bitchin100.com> *Sent:*Friday, May 06, 2016 12:42 AM *Subject:*Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question Hi Bill, TS-DOS has bug in it that causes shift-down to skip all the way to the last page of files instead of showing the 2nd, 3

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

rested in that 'fix' if you get the chance... TIA, m - Original Message - From: Ken Pettit To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question Hi Mike, No, nothing specific about REX ... EPROM would also work. But the media in

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

the means to (re)program the EPROM, >> which a number of us do)? Are the contents different in some way? >> >> m >> - Original Message - >> From: Ken Pettit <mailto:petti...@gmail.com> >> To: Model 100 Discussion <mailto:m100@lists.bitchin100.

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

*To:* Model 100 Discussion <mailto:m100@lists.bitchin100.com> *Sent:* Friday, May 06, 2016 12:42 AM *Subject:* Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question Hi Bill, TS-DOS has bug in it that causes shift-down to skip all the way to the last page of files instead of showing the 2nd, 3rd, et

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

Discussion Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:42 AM Subject: Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question Hi Bill, TS-DOS has bug in it that causes shift-down to skip all the way to the last page of files instead of showing the 2nd, 3rd, etc. pages. I discovered the bug when I disassembled it a few years ago

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

Ok John, I have narrowed it down with Ken’s help to determine it is not Laddiecon. It seems to be a bug in TS-DOS. Alpha works great though, The directories I have seem to work with no problem. I just need to do a workaround for the bug I have in my rom for the 20 file thing, but oh well it w

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

Thanks Ken, I thought I was losing my mind as I was having everything working for the communication part. Bill Nobel b_nobel@ hotmail.com > On May 5, 2016, at 10:42 PM, Ken Pettit wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > TS-DOS has bug in it that causes shift-down to skip all

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

I'm the author of Laddiealpha I've never noticed that. Sounds like a bug or limitation of some part of the system. Probably tsdos. I doubt Laddiealpha is the bottleneck since it uses a c# list so there would be no limitation on list size from that side. The actual protocol gets filenames one at

Re: [M100] TS-Dos Question

Hi Bill, TS-DOS has bug in it that causes shift-down to skip all the way to the last page of files instead of showing the 2nd, 3rd, etc. pages. I discovered the bug when I disassembled it a few years ago and added a fix for the bug. This fix would be available if you ran TS-DOS from REX, but

[M100] TS-Dos Question

Hey guys, I have a question about TS-DOS on rom coming from a PC. I have Laddiecon alpha running on my Win7 starter netbook. I get 2 pages of a directory on the ModelT by using Shift Down arrow in disk mode, but not the entire file list is shown even though a lot of them are .do and .ba files.

Re: [M100] TS-DOS Question

Thanks for the info Ken, After reading your description of the OPEN handler I tried to fake it out but putting .D> as the extension but TS-DOS converts it to .DO. I was thinking that if .D>  was passed through then the TPDD server could treat it the same as .<> but no luck. Looks like a patch to

Re: [M100] TS-DOS Question

Hi Kurt, Looking at the NEWDOS assembly source, the TS-DOS RST 7,30 handler (the BASIC "OPEN" handler), it specifically checks if the first byte of the filename is 'D' and generates an error back to BASIC if it is not. It probably wouldn't be too difficult to add the feature to NEWDOS to sup

[M100] TS-DOS Question

With TS-DOS loaded in the ON state, I can open, read & write files with 0:filename form Basic. Did Traveling Software ever add the ability to change directories from Basic when attached to DeskLink? I've tried doing an open using "0:DIR123.<>" which is how TS-DOS would normally change directorie