Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure...

2003-06-03 Thread Darren
MUGWump wrote: I just looked at one site, and it says that +1000 (which is the setting on your email) is the correct setting if you're in the same time zone as Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. Adelaide is +950 (or +930? never dealt with a half-hour time zone before). Those were the only referen

Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure... (E-Mail Viewing, That Is)

2003-06-03 Thread Darren
Darren wrote: Linux containers: I'm trying redhat on vpc4, I realize this is not what you had in mind when you asked but you do have interesting choices for container size and type under vpc4. Well, like most of my first installs of redhat a hour and a bit where wasted. My own fault naturally

Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure...

2003-06-03 Thread MUGWump
> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:22:21 +1000 > From: Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MUGWump wrote: > > Now I know that Eastern STANDARD Time is -0500, while Eastern > DAYLIGHT Time is -0400. > > Hope it leaves your emailer less confused. Maybe mine, too. > > :) you tell me, your still

Re: For Your Viewing Pleasure... (E-Mail Viewing, That Is)

2003-06-03 Thread Darren
MUGWump wrote: Now I know that Eastern STANDARD Time is -0500, while Eastern DAYLIGHT Time is -0400. Hope it leaves your emailer less confused. Maybe mine, too. :) you tell me, your still an hour in the future :) I haven't ruled out a problem with yahoo. Sorry I can't offer you any more of a fix

For Your Viewing Pleasure... (E-Mail Viewing, That Is)

2003-06-03 Thread MUGWump
Dear Darren; Being somewhat less cranky today (I've been going thru a medicine change) as well as being appreciative of your off-list help, I've started to change the settings on my emailer's accounts to -0400, which is the setting for Eastern DAYLIGHT Time. Hopefully you'll be getting fewer p

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-06-03 Thread Darren
William Ove wrote: I went back and gave it another try and you were correct, 2.1.7 is working fine with my DOS hard drive file. Must have been some glitch the first time through. Hi, did you have success with using the clipboard both ways? I can go mac -> pc but have trouble the other way. Glad

Re: SoftPC--the 68K Version (Was: Mac Emulators--Which?)

2003-06-03 Thread William Ove
on 5/29/03 9:30 AM, Darren at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > :) when I joined this list I had 2.1.7 installed as a stand alone app > running dos only because I couldn't figure out the cdrom driver and I > had yet to install the pc compatabilty software onto the pc image. I > made a new larger dos imag