On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:56 PM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:45:30AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote:
% perl -e 'chomp($vers = `sw_vers -productVersion`); print "$vers\n"'
That will get you either 10.x or 10.x.y. You just need to strip off
the .y if it is there.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:45:30AM -0700, Edward Moy wrote:
> % perl -e 'chomp($vers = `sw_vers -productVersion`); print "$vers\n"'
> That will get you either 10.x or 10.x.y. You just need to strip off
> the .y if it is there.
Perfect, thanks!
--
David Cantrell | Nth greatest programmer in t
On Oct 14, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of October 14, 2007 12:26:50 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is alleged to have said:
Why is that? Does Apple not provide the resources to make this
possible?
Personally I think they should because the Mac is a great development
platform. I
At 17:29 +0100 14/10/07, David Cantrell wrote:
Is there any simple way that people can think of to detect which major
version of OS X my perl code is running on?
ie whether it's 10.0, 10.1 etc, I don't care about the difference
between 10.3.3 and 10.3.4.
print `osascript -e 'tell app "Finder"
% perl -e 'chomp($vers = `sw_vers -productVersion`); print "$vers\n"'
That will get you either 10.x or 10.x.y. You just need to strip off
the .y if it is there.
Ed
On Oct 14, 2007, at 9:29 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
Is there any simple way that people can think of to detect which major
ver
Is there any simple way that people can think of to detect which major
version of OS X my perl code is running on?
ie whether it's 10.0, 10.1 etc, I don't care about the difference
between 10.3.3 and 10.3.4.
--
David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age
I caught myself pulling grey hairs
--As of October 14, 2007 12:26:50 PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
alleged to have said:
Why is that? Does Apple not provide the resources to make this possible?
Personally I think they should because the Mac is a great development
platform. I think Apple would win more developers to the platform
On Oct 14, 2007, at 11:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject line was "Leopard Perl version",
Sorry, I misunderstood.
so I said it's been 5.8.8 for quite a while. It is no secret that
we (Apple) try our best to keep up-to-date with perl (and other
opensource projects) at every maj
On Oct 13, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Bo Lindbergh wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Moy) wrote:
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
But still no 64-bit integers?
As long as Configure says:
Perl can be built to take advantage of 6
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
*ahem*
Go back and read Mr Moy'ss email address.
He may be in a position to answer this question definitively. :-)
FWIW, I didn't see Ed saying that it had been 5.8.8 in _10.4_ for
quite a while. (His mode of expression was, admittedly, a bit
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Moy) wrote:
> % perl -v
>
> This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
But still no 64-bit integers?
/Bo Lindbergh
11 matches
Mail list logo
