On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 08:34 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Unfortunately I don't think I'm going to be able to test it. I've
recently gotten a couple of OS X 10.2 CDs, and I'm going to upgrade
soon. So I guess I can't be the 10.1.x tester anymore. A small price
to pay for getting a bette
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 02:13 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 11:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe, any idea what could be causing the errors that Ken is getting?
Nope :-(. It doesn't look like the apreq patch is causing the
errors. It looks more like apac
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 11:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe, any idea what could be causing the errors that Ken is getting?
Nope :-(. It doesn't look like the apreq patch is causing the
errors. It looks more like apache's APACI is hosed on his machine.
I'd recommend retrying with a fr
David Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Dammit, what are you doing to this thing, Ken? ;-) I've never had a
> problem with the patch before, and the new version of it worked for me
> on Jaguar. Very strange.
>
> Joe, any idea what could be causing the errors that Ken is getting?
Nop
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 09:20 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
Aha, when I do that, I indeed see "+ building with static apreq" and
the proper Makefiles created during the 'perl Makefile.PL' output.
Cool. I'll add that information to INSTALL.MacOSX.
However, it dies fairly early during 'make
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 11:11 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
apreq wasn't recognized in your build; if it was, you'd see something
like
+ building with static apreq
...
Creating Makefile in src/lib/apreq
during configuration.
I think the apreq patch requires APACI, so modperl's ht
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
apreq wasn't recognized in your build; if it was, you'd see something
like
+ building with static apreq
...
Creating Makefile in src/lib/apreq
during configuration.
I think the apreq patch requires APACI, so modperl's ht
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 02:37 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
[...]
> > Well, I know that during Apache's configure, it prints something to
> > the terminal like "Statically compiling apreq support".
>
> I don't see that in the output. Here's the f
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 12:50 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
I don't see that in the output. Here's the first part of the 'perl
Makefile.PL' output:
=
[kw-009:~/Downloads/perl/mod_perl-1.27] ken% perl Makefile.PL
EVERYTHIN
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 02:37 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 12:28 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
That gets me past libapreq's 'make', but I get the following upon
'make test':
[kw-009:~/Downloads/perl/httpd-apreq-1.1] ken% make test
t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.co
On Friday, December 27, 2002, at 12:28 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Well, it's still a no go on OS X 10.1.5.
I used:
Apache 1.3.27
mod_perl 1.27
perl 5.6.1
libapreq 1.1_rc2
I followed the instructions in INSTALL.MacOSX up through installing
Apache & mod_perl, with the patches from ht
On Tuesday, December 24, 2002, at 01:03 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
I've written installation instructions for the new version of libapreq,
1.1, which is due to be released any second now. Would some of you do
me the favor of testing the install by following my instructions on
your systems, usin
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 11:33 PM, _brian_d_foy wrote:
i don't see any such file in that distribution.
It's attached to David's e-mail message, not in the distribution.
ah, attachments do not show up in the NNTP interface.
I've also posted them to my web site:
http://david.whe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geoffrey F.
Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/26/02 1:06 AM, "brian d foy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
> > Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.apache.org/~joes/libapreq-1.1_rc2.tar.gz
> >>
>
On 12/26/02 1:06 AM, "brian d foy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
> Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>http://www.apache.org/~joes/libapreq-1.1_rc2.tar.gz
>>
>> Just use the instructions in the attached INSTALL.MacOSX file that are
>> relevant to your
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://www.apache.org/~joes/libapreq-1.1_rc2.tar.gz
>
> Just use the instructions in the attached INSTALL.MacOSX file that are
> relevant to your version of Mac OS X.
i don't see any such file in that distribution.
i
Hi All,
I've written installation instructions for the new version of libapreq,
1.1, which is due to be released any second now. Would some of you do
me the favor of testing the install by following my instructions on
your systems, using the libapreq 1.1 release candidate? You can grab it
here
17 matches
Mail list logo
