On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 05:06 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Conceptually, it would be better to go back and do DBM_LIB="-lSystem"
(with the dash), because that's where it's actually located.
I'll update my patch and resubmit it to the Apache developers.
Done. FYI:
http://nagoya.apac
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 12:06 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
If you look closely, though, you'll see it says "lSystem"
instead of "-lSystem". It should be "-lSystem".
D'oh! I could have swarn I did "-lSystem"! But testing
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
If you look closely, though, you'll see it says "lSystem" instead of
"-lSystem". It should be "-lSystem".
D'oh! I could have swarn I did "-lSystem"! But testing it again now,
it's working with "-lSystem", so I guess I didn't. G
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 11:58 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:50 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Another option: update src/Configure (in the apache
distribution) to give a better hint for darwin platform,
something like:
DBM_LIB="-lSystem"
Nope,
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:47 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Hmm - none of those are 'dbm', though. David, can you show/quote the
page that claimed that dbm was a part of libSystem?
I think that ndbm is it. It's what Perl finds when it compiles, and
when I have gdbm installed, mod_ssl fin
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:50 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Another option: update src/Configure (in the apache distribution) to
give a better hint for darwin platform, something like:
DBM_LIB="-lSystem"
Nope, that didn't work:
Error Output for sanity check
cd .
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:50 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining about
-ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against libSystem?
According to this document fr
Hmm - none of those are 'dbm', though. David, can you show/quote the
page that claimed that dbm was a part of libSystem?
-Ken
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:35 AM, Jerry LeVan wrote:
David
[macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name |
grep db
module_name
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 10:50 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining
about -ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against
libSystem?
According to this document f
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 03:35 PM, Jerry LeVan wrote:
[macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name |
grep db
module_name = ndbm.So
module_name = db.So
module_name = aliasdb.o
module_name = printerdb.o
Looks like something is there :) Regrettably I
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Ken Williams wrote:
Maybe what's required is just to keep mod_ssl from complaining about
-ldbm (i.e. not search for it), and link against libSystem?
According to this document from Apple (entitled "]Inside Mac OS X: UNIX
Porting Guide"), libSystem
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 08:06 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.x on Mac OS X for a
while now, and it works great. I've had to use gdbm to get it
to compile, but that was okay with me.
Now, however, I'm writing an article about this, and wa
David
[macjerry:/usr/lib]$ otool -vM libSystem.dylib | grep module_name | grep db
module_name = ndbm.So
module_name = db.So
module_name = aliasdb.o
module_name = printerdb.o
Looks like something is there :) Regrettably I don't understand shared
library syntax. Ie how to specify it
Hi All,
I've been using mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.x on Mac OS X for a while now,
and it works great. I've had to use gdbm to get it to compile, but that
was okay with me.
Now, however, I'm writing an article about this, and want to try to
eliminate the gdbm dependency in the name of simplicity.
14 matches
Mail list logo