On 21/08/2007, at 02:55, Landon Fuller wrote:
I don't see any advantage to adding complexity here. I believe we
should write something like this up in the guide:
The default installation of the software should be as feature
complete, out of the box, as is possible. Variants should only be
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
...
Devs: I think this problem occurs because MacPorts needs a newer
version of readline than the one you have in /usr/local. Couldn't
we add a check to ./configure to make sure the correct version of
readline is available, and issue a sensi
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:48 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Hi.
ImageMagick +gs requires the "gslib" component of Ghostscript. But
the ghostscript port doesn't build gslib by default. So, to
properly install ImageMagick +gs, you need to first install
ghostscript +gslib [1]. This is cumbersome.
T
On Aug 21, 2007, at 07:31, Tommaso Urli wrote:
Ok, I renamed libreadline.a and tried "port install readline". Now
let's see if it works.
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:16, Tommaso Urli wrote:
As I said I reinstalled redaline through MacPorts, but still:
frodo:/usr/local/lib root# port selfupdate
Boyd Waters wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
This change will break ports that depends on "python24" and then try
to use the "python" binary, either directly with
#!/opt/local/bin/python or with e.g. #!/usr/bin/env python.
Maybe those ports using port:python24 s
Rainer Müller wrote:
Boyd Waters wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
This change will break ports that depends on "python24" and then try
to use the "python" binary, either directly with
#!/opt/local/bin/python or with e.g. #!/usr/bin/env python.
Maybe those ports us
Boyd Waters wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
I think we we should have separate Framework directories for each
Python version, otherwise if you have 2.4 and 2.5 installed on your
system, then the Current symlink will point to 2.5, presumably, and
you won't be able to d
Boyd Waters wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>
>> This change will break ports that depends on "python24" and then try
>> to use the "python" binary, either directly with
>> #!/opt/local/bin/python or with e.g. #!/usr/bin/env python.
>>
>> Maybe those ports using
On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
I think we we should have separate Framework directories for each
Python version, otherwise if you have 2.4 and 2.5 installed on your
system, then the Current symlink will point to 2.5, presumably, and
you won't be able to do a framework bui
Boyd Waters wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
This change will break ports that depends on "python24" and then try
to use the "python" binary, either directly with
#!/opt/local/bin/python or with e.g. #!/usr/bin/env python.
Maybe those ports using port:python24 s
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
This change will break ports that depends on "python24" and then
try to use the "python" binary, either directly with #!/opt/local/
bin/python or with e.g. #!/usr/bin/env python.
Maybe those ports using port:python24 should be patched t
Revision
28120
Author
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date
2007-08-21 06:41:55 -0700 (Tue, 21 Aug 2007)
Log Message
lang/python24:
Don't install python binaries without version suffix.
Use new python_select to choose your version.
Modified Paths
• trunk/dports/lang/python24/Portfile
Diff
Modif
Regarding this changeset, and the similar one in r28109 for agsocket:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 02:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 28107
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/28107
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-08-21 00:26:10 -0700 (Tue, 21 Aug 2007)
Lo
Hi.
ImageMagick +gs requires the "gslib" component of Ghostscript. But
the ghostscript port doesn't build gslib by default. So, to properly
install ImageMagick +gs, you need to first install ghostscript +gslib
[1]. This is cumbersome.
Is there a compelling reason why the ghostscript port
On Aug 20, 2007, at 06:41, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-08-20 03:36:38 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
We have the -t switch which we can turn on separately to activate
trace mode, which is helpful for discovering undeclared
dependencies. Is there a way that we could somehow see just the
mtree v
On Aug 20, 2007, at 04:10, Tommaso Urli wrote:
ld: warning prebinding disabled because of undefined symbols
ld: Undefined symbols:
_rl_completion_matches
_rl_filename_completion_function
_rl_username_completion_function
/usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
make[2]: *** [Pextlib.d
16 matches
Mail list logo
