On Jul 29, 2008, at 20:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 38743
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/38743
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-07-29 18:39:48 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
Fix breakage at index time. ocamlfind, you're kil
On Jul 29, 2008, at 18:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 38737
> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/38737
> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2008-07-29 16:24:57 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
> Log Message:
> ---
> Add OCamlnet library
>
> Added Paths:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 20:08, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 04:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Revision: 38707
>> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/
>> 38707
>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Date: 2008-07-29 02:52:47 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
>> Log M
On Jul 29, 2008, at 04:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 38707
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/38707
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-07-29 02:52:47 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
pgbouncer: New port submission, pgbouncer 1.1.2.
On Jul 29, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
I know there was a discussion about distfiles in svn lately, but I
missed
the central point. What is the right place to put them now, in cases
where
there is no suitable download location? Should they still live in
svn/distfiles
o
On Jul 29, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> Rainer Müller wrote:
>> I will try to build it completely new in a different prefix and
>> diff the files afterwards to find the issue.
>
> Seems like I finally found the issue.
> It was something in /opt/local/etc/xml/catalog. I am attachin
I know there was a discussion about distfiles in svn lately, but I missed
the central point. What is the right place to put them now, in cases where
there is no suitable download location? Should they still live in svn/distfiles
or elsewhere?
Florian
--
Florian Ebeling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>> I will try to build it completely new in a different prefix and diff the
>> files afterwards to find the issue.
>
> Seems like I finally found the issue.
> It was something in /opt/local/etc/xml/
Rainer Müller wrote:
I will try to build it completely new in a different prefix and diff the
files afterwards to find the issue.
Seems like I finally found the issue.
It was something in /opt/local/etc/xml/catalog. I am attaching a diff of
the old and the new version in case someone else ha
> So I uninstalled docbook-xml, docbook-xsl and libxslt. I made sure that
> there are no files left in /opt/local/share/xml/docbook or
> /opt/local/share/xsl.
>
> Then I reinstalled docbook-xml, docbook-xsl and libxslt. And it still needs
> more than 11 minutes to compile the guide.
>
> I will try
Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>> I don't have XML_CATALOG_FILES in my environment as Bryan suggested in
>> another mail.
>
> Nor do I. And I didn't do any further magic or configuration. No idea, tbh.
>
> Might be an outdated configuration on your machine, because I installed
> and never upgraded
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Caspar Florian Ebeling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Joshua Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>>>
>>> So am I. That's when I whish I had strace on macs as well...
>>
>> Are you aware of dtruss (10.5) and
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Joshua Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>>
>> So am I. That's when I whish I had strace on macs as well...
>
> Are you aware of dtruss (10.5) and ktrace (earlier)?
yeah, only for dtrace I need to learn some D language, apparently, and
Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
> So am I. That's when I whish I had strace on macs as well...
Are you aware of dtruss (10.5) and ktrace (earlier)?
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/
>>> Building the guide with docbook takes very long in my opinion. There is
>>> also
>>> a quicker 'make validate' which just checks for syntax errors before
>>> building.
>>
>> make guide takes 6.5 seconds on my machine, which is quick enough for me,
>> but the make validate takes only 2, so for j
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Probably I should only keep one of the various docbook versions?
I don't have XML_CATALOG_FILES in my environment as Bryan suggested in
another mail.
When I set up the guide regen on my box, I had to set up an XML
catalog stuff in order to
Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>> Building the guide with docbook takes very long in my opinion. There is also
>> a quicker 'make validate' which just checks for syntax errors before
>> building.
>
> make guide takes 6.5 seconds on my machine, which is quick enough for me,
> but the make validate t
On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:13 AM, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>>> make guide takes 6.5 seconds on my machine, which is quick enough
>>> for me,
>>> but the make validate takes only 2, so for just verifying while
>>> editing this is
>>> even better, of course.
>>>
>>
>> If it takes significantly longe
>> make guide takes 6.5 seconds on my machine, which is quick enough
>> for me,
>> but the make validate takes only 2, so for just verifying while
>> editing this is
>> even better, of course.
>>
>
> If it takes significantly longer than this for anyone, check to see if
> you have XML_CATALOG_FILES
On Jul 29, 2008, at 1:07 AM, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
Thanks for catching that. Is there some script I'm meant to run
before
committing changes to the documentation, to make sure I'm not
breaking
something?
>>>
>>> Just do a "make guide" or "make guide-chunked" in
>>> Thanks for catching that. Is there some script I'm meant to run before
>>> committing changes to the documentation, to make sure I'm not breaking
>>> something?
>>
>> Just do a "make guide" or "make guide-chunked" in doc-new/. If it runs
>> without errors it should be ok, but you can visually c
21 matches
Mail list logo
