Re: Oldish devel versions of Emacs

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Scharver
On Dec 24, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Akim Demaille wrote: > Is it really useful to keep these obsolete « devel » versions > of Emacs? emacs-app-devel, emacs-snapshot, emacs-w3m-devel Probably not. I know originally the stable release's Cocoa support was nonexistent. I think once the build systems chang

Re: Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Craig Treleaven wrote: > Myth installs double-clickable Applescript helpers that you can drag to the > Dock--which auto-magically creates a link. What I've experienced is that when > Myth is uninstalled, the link on the Dock remains. Perhaps LaunchPad is > doing t

Re: Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 5:06 PM -0500 12/30/13, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Dec 30, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote: Yes, that would be expected behaviour. MacPorts has no way of knowing that the link was created so it ends up pointing to a now-deleted file after an uninstall. Where do the links come

Re: [114830] trunk/dports/gnome/metacity

2013-12-30 Thread David Evans
On 12/30/13 5:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Dec 16, 2013, at 17:52, dev...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision >> 114830 >> Author >> dev...@macports.org >> Date >> 2013-12-16 15:52:51 -0800 (Mon, 16 Dec 2013) >> Log Message >> >> metacity: apply upstream patches through 20131011, enable debuging c

Re: [115275] users/landonf/openjdk7/dports/java/openjdk7/Portfile

2013-12-30 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
This prevents use of our llvm-gcc42 port ("macports-llvm-gcc-4.2"). Is this intentional? vq On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:20 AM, land...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 115275 > Author > land...@macports.org > Date > 2013-12-30 07:20:02 -0800 (Mon, 30 Dec 2013) > Log Message > > Explicitly whitelis

Re: Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Dec 30, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote: > Yes, that would be expected behaviour. MacPorts has no way of knowing that > the link was created so it ends up pointing to a now-deleted file after an > uninstall. Where do the links come from? Are they created by MythTV at runtime? If M

Re: Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread MK-MacPorts
Hi Craig, On 30 Dec 2013, at 15:57 , Craig Treleaven wrote: > Yes, that would be expected behaviour. MacPorts has no way of > knowing that the link was created so it ends up pointing to a > now-deleted file after an uninstall. ah, okay. I wasn’t sure, that’s why I asked. I thought there were e

Re: Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi Marko: Yes, that would be expected behaviour. MacPorts has no way of knowing that the link was created so it ends up pointing to a now-deleted file after an uninstall. The real question is: why would you want to uninstall?!? ;) Craig At 3:19 PM +0100 12/30/13, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wr

Launchpad-links to non-existing executables stay behind after deinstalling mythtv-core.27

2013-12-30 Thread MK-MacPorts
Hi Craig, after deinstallation of mythtv-core.27 I realised on 10.9 that Myth_Filldatabase and Myth_Frontend stay behind in one of LauchPad’s MacPorts application folders although they are invalid links. Is this normal behaviour or a glitch in the deinstallation phase? Greets, Marko __

Re: [114830] trunk/dports/gnome/metacity

2013-12-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 16, 2013, at 17:52, dev...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 114830 > Author > dev...@macports.org > Date > 2013-12-16 15:52:51 -0800 (Mon, 16 Dec 2013) > Log Message > > metacity: apply upstream patches through 20131011, enable debuging code. > Modified Paths > > • trunk/dports/gno

Re: [115236] trunk/dports/gnome/gtk-doc/Portfile

2013-12-30 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Dec 30, 2013, at 01:03, David Evans wrote: > Ok, have removed the openjade dependency from gtk-doc in r115257. Also > rev bumped openjade in r115255 to override the improperly built archive > on Mavericks. Ah yes, thanks for noticing that. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sig

Re: [115236] trunk/dports/gnome/gtk-doc/Portfile

2013-12-30 Thread David Evans
On 12/30/13 12:39 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > On Dec 30, 2013, at 00:21, David Evans wrote: > >> On 12/29/13 11:48 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >>> I strongly suggest either reverting this or fixing openjade to build with >>> clang. As it is, this blocks a decent number of por

Re: [115236] trunk/dports/gnome/gtk-doc/Portfile

2013-12-30 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Dec 30, 2013, at 00:21, David Evans wrote: > On 12/29/13 11:48 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >> I strongly suggest either reverting this or fixing openjade to build with >> clang. As it is, this blocks a decent number of ports from building on >> Mavericks =(. >> >> --Jeremy >> >>

Re: [115236] trunk/dports/gnome/gtk-doc/Portfile

2013-12-30 Thread David Evans
On 12/29/13 11:48 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > I strongly suggest either reverting this or fixing openjade to build with > clang. As it is, this blocks a decent number of ports from building on > Mavericks =(. > > --Jeremy > > On Dec 29, 2013, at 12:34, dev...@macports.org wrote: > > T