Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2015-10-27 22:24, Marko Käning wrote: >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> while building kdevelop and kdepim4 I came across some rev-upgrades… Thus I >> have rebumped ports kate, libkgapi and konversation. >> >> For instance, the latter tried to find

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

On 2015-10-27 22:24, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > while building kdevelop and kdepim4 I came across some rev-upgrades… Thus I > have rebumped ports kate, libkgapi and konversation. > > For instance, the latter tried to find libqca in it’s old location > --- > Dyld Error Message: >

Problems with github & livecheck

Hi, I'm getting some weird results with the livecheck with respect to gate: > port info gate gate @7.1_4 (science) ... > port -v livecheck gate gate seems to have been updated (port version: e657ed0c, new version: v7.0) This is the relevant part of the code that apparently confuses the

Re: Problems with github & livecheck

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > On Thu, October 29, 2015 11:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> I'm getting some weird results with the livecheck with respect to gate: >> >>> port info gate >> gate @7.1_4 (science) ... >> >>> port -v livecheck gate >> gate seems to have been

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

> On Oct 29, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > What was the reason for moving Qt4 into its own prefix? I guess this is > about allowing Qt4 and Qt5 to be installed at the same time? > > I only noticed this now, but it seems this change will cause problems: > > *

Re: Problems with github & livecheck

On 2015-10-29 16:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I'm getting some weird results with the livecheck with respect to gate: > >> port info gate > gate @7.1_4 (science) > ... >> port -v livecheck gate > gate seems to have been updated (port version: e657ed0c, new version: v7.0) > > This is the relevant

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

Ohoh, so this is finally where I get to say "I told you so"? @Michael Dickens wrote: > qtscriptgenerator is having issues with locating phonon now that it's > not co-located with the qt4 install. Like QCA, it might make sense to > just co-locate phonon into the new qt4 install prefix. Yeah, and

Re: f2py: request for help

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2015-10-28 20:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> Apart from the fact that I don't know how to get a binary called >> "f2py" (it would be nice to have the executable without the extension >> available), running >>

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2015-10-29 17:05, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> When 10.11 came out (where Qt 4 no longer worked), the >> switch to Qt 5 and moving Qt 4 away suddenly had to be done in a >> hurry, so the maintainer decided for the easier path to simply put

Re: f2py: request for help

On 2015-10-28 20:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Apart from the fact that I don't know how to get a binary called > "f2py" (it would be nice to have the executable without the extension > available), running > f2py-3.5 -c fib1.f -m fib1 > fails to find the Fortran compiler as it looks for gfortran

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

Here's my take: Qt4 needed to be moved out of the way to be installable in parallel with Qt5, and, by moving everything into a location where you have to know where it is, we really test the build systems for those ports that use Qt4/5. Many ports, generally those that use the qt4 or qmake

Re: Please test trace mode on El Capitan

- On 27 Oct, 2015, at 22:51, Clemens Lang c...@macports.org wrote: > I didn't see this in my test runs, but maybe I just overlooked it. I guess we > should just add that path to the trace whitelist, because it's basically > /usr/bin or /bin anyway. Should be fixed in r141852. -- Clemens

Re: All KDE ports need a major revbump, due to recent changes to qt4-mac

Michael Dickens wrote: > qmake PortGroups, just needed a rev-bump. Some ports such as phonon > install files that =assume= the same install prefix as Qt, and so when > they are installed elsewhere everything breaks down for ports that > depend on them (e.g., using qmake to find phonon fails

Re: f2py: request for help

On 2015-10-29 17:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> On 2015-10-28 20:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> Apart from the fact that I don't know how to get a binary called >>> "f2py" (it would be nice to have the executable without

Re: f2py: request for help

On 2015-10-30 03:28 , Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2015-10-28 20:20, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> Apart from the fact that I don't know how to get a binary called >> "f2py" (it would be nice to have the executable without the extension >> available), running >> f2py-3.5 -c fib1.f -m fib1 >> fails to